GRE作文成績(jī)雖然不計(jì)入GRE考試總分，但對(duì)于想要申請(qǐng)文科類研究生專業(yè)的考生來(lái)說(shuō)其價(jià)值并不容忽視，許多排名靠前的文科類院校和專業(yè)都會(huì)對(duì)GRE寫作成績(jī)提出單獨(dú)要求。下面小編就和大家分享GRE作文分?jǐn)?shù)重要嗎，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

GRE作文分?jǐn)?shù)重要嗎?

許多人可能都覺得，作文獨(dú)立計(jì)分不算入總分，可能其分?jǐn)?shù)重要性并不是太高。這種想法其實(shí)是存在很大錯(cuò)誤的，原因主要有兩點(diǎn)：

1. 文科專業(yè)重視GRE作文分?jǐn)?shù)

眾所周知，GRE考試作為一門研究生階段入學(xué)的綜合能力測(cè)試，其考試成績(jī)可以用來(lái)申請(qǐng)全美各大學(xué)校的大部分研究生專業(yè)和項(xiàng)目。理科項(xiàng)目一般不需要作文得分，更看重的是GRE總分和GRE數(shù)學(xué)部分的成績(jī)。而文科項(xiàng)目除了總分和語(yǔ)文部分成績(jī)外，對(duì)于作文也往往會(huì)提出專門的分?jǐn)?shù)要求，在這一點(diǎn)上越是優(yōu)秀的學(xué)校越是明顯。而假如考生想要申請(qǐng)的是排名靠前，在TOP20以內(nèi)的頂尖文科名校，那么GRE作文至少也需要考出4分以上的成績(jī)才能過(guò)關(guān)。根據(jù)官方發(fā)布的最新數(shù)據(jù)顯示，2016年中國(guó)考生的GRE作文平均成績(jī)僅為3分，因此大家想要獲得優(yōu)秀文科院校的青睞，就需要在作文方面獲得超過(guò)大部分考生的平均水準(zhǔn)的成績(jī)。

2. 作文分?jǐn)?shù)常用于初期篩選申請(qǐng)人

同時(shí)，由于目前許多頂級(jí)名校的申請(qǐng)人數(shù)過(guò)多，招生官在初步篩選申請(qǐng)者時(shí)，往往會(huì)采取先根據(jù)GRE得分一刀切的方式，把一定分?jǐn)?shù)線以下的考生直接排除。而在剩下的考生中，哪怕你的GRE總分超過(guò)別人不少，但如果作文分?jǐn)?shù)偏低，那么你的被錄取可能性就會(huì)降低?？梢哉f(shuō)，在GRE總分處于同一水平的情況下，考生GRE作文得分高低將成為衡量考生水平的重要參考指標(biāo)。

GRE寫作提分從這些角度入手

因此，GRE考生如果申請(qǐng)的是文科類院校專業(yè)，那么作文成績(jī)就必須要進(jìn)行提升，而提分的具體側(cè)重要點(diǎn)可以歸納為以下四個(gè)方面：

1. 整體結(jié)構(gòu)

文章的整體結(jié)構(gòu)框架是一篇作文好壞的最重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。一般來(lái)說(shuō)，一篇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的GRE高分作文，按照開頭，結(jié)尾加上中間三個(gè)段落的五段式寫法是比較常見的。因此，考生對(duì)于一篇文章的寫作，至少要列出3個(gè)分論點(diǎn)，確保中間三段言之有物，同時(shí)開頭結(jié)尾也需要發(fā)揮出各自相應(yīng)的引導(dǎo)和總結(jié)作用。

2. 邏輯論證

GRE作文有兩篇，而無(wú)論是立論文ISSUE還是駁論文ARGUMENT，其本質(zhì)都屬于議論文，因此讓文章顯得有說(shuō)服力就成為了關(guān)鍵所在。無(wú)論是讓自己的論點(diǎn)能夠站得住腳，還是讓對(duì)方的觀點(diǎn)顯得錯(cuò)誤百出，都需要考生通過(guò)邏輯論證來(lái)得以實(shí)現(xiàn)。因此，邏輯論證的合理性、對(duì)觀點(diǎn)挖掘的深度，以及分論點(diǎn)之間的的連貫性，都考生需要在寫作中體現(xiàn)出來(lái)以支撐邏輯論證。

3. 遣詞造句

一篇好作文自然離不開詞句上的運(yùn)用。合理正確沒有語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤只能算是達(dá)標(biāo)，想要讓GRE作文得到4分以上的評(píng)價(jià)，考生就需要在達(dá)標(biāo)以上進(jìn)一步進(jìn)行遣詞造句的優(yōu)化運(yùn)用。句式使用上需要多樣化，避免簡(jiǎn)單句的連續(xù)出現(xiàn)，但也不能過(guò)度堆砌長(zhǎng)難句而讓文章顯得累贅。詞匯運(yùn)用上不能重復(fù)使用相同詞匯，要體現(xiàn)出一定的變化展現(xiàn)詞匯量，但也要確保所用詞匯的正確表達(dá)，不能為了追求新穎而濫用生僻詞匯，也需要避免詞匯間錯(cuò)誤搭配的問(wèn)題。

4. 字?jǐn)?shù)篇幅

雖然GRE考試對(duì)于作文字?jǐn)?shù)篇幅從來(lái)沒有提出過(guò)明確要求，但根據(jù)官方公布的各類高分范文來(lái)看，一般來(lái)說(shuō)字?jǐn)?shù)在400-600字是最佳范圍。這是因?yàn)槠^(guò)短的文章，容易給考官留下考生寫作能力不足，無(wú)法表達(dá)出自己想法的印象，但篇幅太長(zhǎng)同樣會(huì)給人留下啰嗦累贅的感覺。因此把文章的篇幅字?jǐn)?shù)控制在400-600字是最為合適的做法。

綜上所述，哪怕是GRE作文成績(jī)不計(jì)入總分，大家也不能對(duì)作文備考掉以輕心。特別是對(duì)于想要申請(qǐng)文科的考生來(lái)說(shuō)，足夠優(yōu)秀的作文成績(jī)才能幫你在達(dá)成申請(qǐng)目標(biāo)成功拿到OFFER的道路上走得更遠(yuǎn)。

GRE寫作高分范文：競(jìng)爭(zhēng)利弊問(wèn)題

題目：

"Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."

歸根結(jié)底，競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)于社會(huì)是利多弊少。

正文：

Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.

First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those

universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.

Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.

Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.

While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.

That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.

GRE寫作高分范文：多媒體教育

GRE寫作題目：

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

盡管諸如電視、電腦和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)這樣的發(fā)明似乎給學(xué)校教育提供了進(jìn)步的手段，但是所有這些技術(shù)往往也是在偏離真正的學(xué)習(xí)。

GRE寫作范文：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.