GRE考生都想在寫作中取得高分，但想取得高分并非易事。很多必要的寫作知識(shí)你掌握了嗎?GRE詞匯你背上80%了嗎?寫作技巧有沒有了解?下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作各類備考訓(xùn)練提分方法經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)，希望能夠幫助到大家，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作各類備考訓(xùn)練提分方法經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)

關(guān)于GRE作文官方題庫(kù)

題庫(kù)是給定的，經(jīng)過(guò)幾年下來(lái)的前人總結(jié)，本身已經(jīng)毫無(wú)懸念。高頻，模板，例證，范文，大量資料充斥在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上并且被專業(yè)人士和機(jī)構(gòu)總結(jié)印刷成冊(cè)?？忌鷤冎讳N在考前花兩三個(gè)月集中練習(xí)，得個(gè)申請(qǐng)的分?jǐn)?shù)根本不成問(wèn)題?；A(chǔ)好的人更是一兩個(gè)月已足矣。但問(wèn)題也隨之而來(lái)了，大家都用著同樣的參考資料不說(shuō)，寫作水平也都如出一轍，考官看來(lái)也就無(wú)法分辨孰好孰壞，唯有給出最安全的分?jǐn)?shù)。

關(guān)于GRE作文的語(yǔ)言應(yīng)用

很多同學(xué)對(duì)備考更傾向于去臨陣磨槍，語(yǔ)言上雖然慢慢向規(guī)范的英文書面語(yǔ)靠攏，但仍缺乏時(shí)間上的沉淀而無(wú)法達(dá)到GRE寫作本身的語(yǔ)言精練，一步到位的特點(diǎn)。僅僅做到了形似而神不似。因此觀點(diǎn)寫得稍好一點(diǎn)的同學(xué)，就可得到那0.5，如果有語(yǔ)言做支持，就可上到4。

關(guān)于GRE作文的思路拓展

可以說(shuō)大部分考生的GRE寫作還停留在臨摹而不是獨(dú)立作品的階段。因?yàn)橛兄F(xiàn)成的模板和例證，在范文的引導(dǎo)下，模仿寫作的結(jié)構(gòu)和觀點(diǎn)。所以往往造成一篇作文看起來(lái)是那么回事兒，但實(shí)際上又沒有說(shuō)透的感覺。對(duì)題目的意義和作文目的的把握還缺少透徹的理解。

GRE作文提升幾個(gè)要點(diǎn)解讀

1. 詞匯。很多人在問(wèn)，究竟需要不需要在寫作前背完詞匯精選的單詞。小編認(rèn)為詞匯精選的單詞是針對(duì)語(yǔ)文部分搜集整理的，與作文的關(guān)系不大。作文需要的高級(jí)詞匯仍然是那幾個(gè)，therefore,however,admittedly。機(jī)器或者考官一見，馬上會(huì)鎖定，懂得寫議論文，就靠它們幾個(gè)。另外一些常用動(dòng)詞名詞等實(shí)詞的同義詞要多背幾組，英語(yǔ)的修辭不在華麗，在變換。句型要多變，表達(dá)同種意思的詞當(dāng)然也要變換。

2. 模板。模板怎么用，不是不用，而是要合理利用。因?yàn)檫@實(shí)在是一個(gè)可以讓初學(xué)者一目了然，直奔主題的好東西。什么是結(jié)構(gòu)，模板就是結(jié)構(gòu)。模板是骨架，是支撐，但不是靈魂。靈魂的部分當(dāng)然是文章的主旨，要靠自己在不懈的寫作，不斷的鉆研中去摸索和尋找的。千萬(wàn)不可以依賴模板。一篇沒有靈魂的骨架子是沒法得高分的。

3. 練習(xí)。練習(xí)是一定要堅(jiān)持得，從始至終。而且量變到質(zhì)變的突破是需要時(shí)間的。

4. 臨考。臨考前的模考是為了讓大家去把握時(shí)間，更好的進(jìn)一步的查缺補(bǔ)漏。在考場(chǎng)上，更是要臨危不亂，無(wú)論出現(xiàn)什么樣的題目，相信自己，都是見過(guò)的，萬(wàn)變不離其宗，這當(dāng)然需要練習(xí)時(shí)不斷去完善自己的知識(shí)庫(kù)。

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"The media (books, film, music, television, for example) tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society."

"The media tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society", is true because society allow the media to pusrue this in such a way.

The American culture as a whole lives through the pulse of the media world and is enthralled by movies, lyrics and film. Because of the nature by which our society is dependant on the media, the media is able to create any senses of values adaptable by our society.

This is not to say that the media is solely responsible for the values of American culture, however, our society makes this creation possible. Although there are many who will disagree with the medias portrayal of many issues, our society as a whole fuels the fire to which the media thrives on. For the most part, books, films and music are produced to sell and the media knows to which audience they are targetting.

The way in which a culture enable the media to create it's values, ultimately reflects the values of a society.

Comments:

This is a seriously flawed response to the topic because the reasoning is weak and the ideas are unclear.

The writer's position on the issue seems clear enough, but the paper presents few reasons to support that position. And even those reasons are not explained clearly. For example, the writer often refers to the means by which the media influence society (e.g., "such a way," "the nature by which," and "the way in which") but fails to explain what those ideas mean or why they are important.

Problems in word choice frequently create confusion. For example, these could be interesting ideas if they were expressed clearly: "our society as a whole fuels the fire to which the media thrives on" and "the media is able to create any senses of values adaptable by our society."

Also, many basic errors affect meaning throughout the paper: subject-verb agreement (first and last paragraphs), comma splice (third paragraph), "medias'" for "media's" (third paragraph), and "it's" for "its" (last paragraph).

The lack of clear reasons, combined with serious error in language use, keep this essay at the 2 score level.

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??

"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??

Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?company's?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.??Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics'?reviews.??Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.??If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.??Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.??The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.??The?company's?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.??

Commentary??

This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.??Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.??

The?essay?identifies?four?points:??

--?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?

--?the?movies'?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing

--?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather????than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?

--?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home????computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters??

Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.??But?the?paper's?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.??It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.?