雅思OG怎么用?了解用法備考少走彎路,今天小編給大家?guī)?lái)雅思OG怎么用 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

雅思OG怎么用?了解用法備考少走彎路

一. 通過(guò)雅思OG了解雅思考試

備考初期許多同學(xué)對(duì)雅思考試還知之甚少，此時(shí)則可以通過(guò)雅思OG(Official Guide)來(lái)了解雅思考試。雅思備考的過(guò)程中，有的同學(xué)會(huì)選擇報(bào)班，有的同學(xué)則選擇自學(xué)，報(bào)班的同學(xué)可以由老師來(lái)系統(tǒng)解答關(guān)于雅思的一系列疑問(wèn)，但若是選擇自學(xué)又該如何全面而系統(tǒng)地了解雅思考試呢?最好的辦法就是看雅思OG。雅思OG有關(guān)于雅思考試的介紹，涉及到各個(gè)方面，比如雅思考試的科目，雅思考試科目所包含題目類型，考試時(shí)間，評(píng)分原則，備考技巧等等。所以建議選擇自學(xué)的小伙伴在備考之前先總覽OG，然后再制定備考攻略。

二. 雅思OG習(xí)題可用作強(qiáng)化練習(xí)

雅思OG不只有考試的一些指南和技巧，也有整套的雅思模擬練習(xí)題，也可以用來(lái)在備考中做練習(xí)用。劍雅真題是來(lái)源于雅思考試的真題，而OG里的題目卻并非來(lái)源于真題，所以O(shè)G作為習(xí)題練習(xí)的優(yōu)先級(jí)是要放在劍雅真題之后的。做過(guò)OG的同學(xué)都了解，OG里面的題目真題難度要略高于真題，雖然聽力音頻語(yǔ)速可能稍慢，但是題目難度卻大了不少。建議大家在備考雅思時(shí)，做透了劍雅真題以后可以拿OG練習(xí)題來(lái)做強(qiáng)化練習(xí)。雖然OG不如真題，但它畢竟也是官方出品，模擬題的價(jià)值也是遠(yuǎn)大于市面上同類模考題，而且OG每套題目后面都配有詳細(xì)解析，口語(yǔ)和寫作更是有官方給出的范文，這些都是很具有參考價(jià)值的。

三. 雅思OG使用注意事項(xiàng)

1. 不建議只用OG備考

有的同學(xué)可能會(huì)覺得OG有考試指南，有模擬題目，那么雅思備考只用這一本就可以了。雅思OG確實(shí)很有價(jià)值，但卻不能作為唯一備考資料，因?yàn)樗念}目與真實(shí)考試有差異，而且題目?jī)?nèi)容相對(duì)較少。

1. 不建議用來(lái)做?？?/p>

雅思OG上面雖然有模擬題，但是不建議用來(lái)做模考，如果大家在備考之初或者考試前想了解自己的雅思水平，可以用劍雅真題來(lái)做?？?。OG題目雖然也是官方給出的，但畢竟不是真題，做模考得出的分?jǐn)?shù)并不準(zhǔn)確。

2. 不建議一開始就用它做題

我們?cè)谏衔囊蔡岬竭^(guò)，雅思OG上面題目難度整體要高于真題，所以一開始就做可能會(huì)因?yàn)轭}目太難而打擊自信心，建議將OG題目放在強(qiáng)化階段練習(xí)。

雅思OG是考試官方給出的非常優(yōu)質(zhì)的備考資料，可以幫助大家了解考試，學(xué)習(xí)備考技巧，還能做習(xí)題練習(xí)，但是OG使用過(guò)程中也要了解一些注意事項(xiàng)，比如不要用來(lái)做模考，不要一上來(lái)就做OG題目等等。

雅思大作文模板：征收交通擁擠稅?

In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

雅思大作文模板范文參考：

The traffic congestion issue has long been a public concern especially in some large cities worldwide. Whether governments should be involved in solving this problem has triggered a heated controversy. It is true that government intervention can bring some benefits to some extent, it is opposed by some people though.

Undoubtedly, governments posses greater authority than any other parties in the society, which means their intervention is comparatively effective. For example, the implement of congestion tax can directly lead to the deadline of traffic during those rush hours because of the increasing driving cost. Another advantage of government intervention is that governments can impact the public to a wider extent. Unlike some actions taken by the social communities, large companies or individuals, the projects carried out by governments have restrictions on every citizen living in the city or country. Once the traffic congestion is reduced, there will be many positive effects followed by, for instance, the commuting time can be largely reduced for those who need to travel to and from work.

On the other hand, the extra tax raised by the government will impose a negative effect on some people. One potential group influenced by this policy are those who have to drive to and from work. If this measure comes into effect, the financial burden on them is definitely higher. As a result, the well-being of these people may experience a deadline, which is against the aim of government policies.

In conclusion, benefits and drawbacks co-exits in terms of this tax policy. It can effectively solve the traffic problems to a large extent, while some damages can be caused to those who are taxed especially in the financial way.

雅思大作文模板：青少年犯罪類問(wèn)題

A recent newspaper article reports that a 14-year-old boy who seriously destroyed his school got a punishment to clean streets instead of sent to the prison, do you think this is right, or the young criminals should be sent to the jail?

雅思大作文模板范文參考：

Children nowadays are exposed in a diversified environment where they have absolute access to internet, being able to befriend with people from a variety of backgrounds. This may result in children’s antisocial behavior and there is a beat debate on whether teenagers who commit serious crimes should be punished by doing some volunteering jobs or being imprisoned.

Contributing to their community can be an effective way to tell them that they are victimizing other people. One argument in its favor is that they are immature. It would be a difficult thing to predict the consequences of their behavior and law knowledge not be sufficiently acquired at that young age. Another important factor in this respect is that they are formable in character compared to adult criminal, thus it is better to educate them. Doing something valuable to their society can embed a sense of responsibility in them and give them an opportunity to reflect on their deviance, which will truly rectify their criminality.

However, of course those who advocate custody sentence may have some plausibility to some extent. Allowing them to recognize their mistakes is the priority of taking adolescent law breakers into prison. One received harsh penalty, preventing persistent crime seems to be possible. But the believers of this have ignored the issue over what if they are negatively influenced by other prisoners? How should they face the society with an ex-record especially when finding jobs.

In conclusion, I therefore believe that having faith in the young who go astray cannot be a more effective way to solve raging young criminal activities and taking responsibility for their living surroundings is the best way to do this.