雅思考試的優(yōu)勢(shì)是什么?今天小編給大家?guī)?lái)了雅思考試的優(yōu)勢(shì)在哪里,希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
雅思考試的優(yōu)勢(shì)在哪里
一，人人對(duì)話口語(yǔ)模式
雅思認(rèn)為，語(yǔ)言就是為了人與人的溝通。所以雅思首創(chuàng)一對(duì)一口語(yǔ)考試模式，考核你的真實(shí)英語(yǔ)溝通能力。你將在輕松的環(huán)境中與考官進(jìn)行日常溝通，和冷冰冰的人機(jī)對(duì)話相比，能消除距離感和緊張感。
二，使用范圍廣泛
讓你通行全球，在全球范圍內(nèi)雅思考試總共受到了超過(guò)6,000所教育機(jī)構(gòu)的認(rèn)可，無(wú)論你想留學(xué)、移民，或是就業(yè)，雅思考試都是理想的選擇。
三，好發(fā)揮才有好成績(jī)
雅思采用的紙筆作答模式，符合中國(guó)考生的習(xí)慣，能消除面對(duì)計(jì)算機(jī)作答的不適應(yīng)感，同時(shí)雅思良好有序、安靜、無(wú)干擾的考場(chǎng)環(huán)境，確保你快速進(jìn)入考試狀態(tài)，讓你發(fā)揮出最佳水平。
四，評(píng)測(cè)公正
雅思考試由在英語(yǔ)測(cè)評(píng)方面擁有95年悠久歷史和豐富經(jīng)驗(yàn)的劍橋大學(xué)考試委員會(huì)設(shè)計(jì)研發(fā)，首創(chuàng)從聽、說(shuō)、讀、寫四方面進(jìn)行英語(yǔ)能力全面考核。
雅思為了保證你考試時(shí)的良好狀態(tài)，將筆試與口試分開進(jìn)行，避免連續(xù)幾個(gè)小時(shí)的考試會(huì)讓你產(chǎn)生疲倦而影響發(fā)揮。
雅思大作文：the education system for today's world
雅思大作文題目：in some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. For today's world, which system is appropriate?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
作文范文：
Resource input and immediate goals on education vary according to governmental policies within nations. In regard to secondary schools, some set up the whole range of subjects whereas others provide less for more specific future rewards for teenagers. Nowadays, from my point, I would stand for the latter due to its higher efficiency, more clarified direction and better experience.
Curriculum of all sorts have pros and cons for individuals. One major advantage lies in a wider perception of the world as each course represents a particular field that human beings have been developing and can offer a new perspective. Moreover, the students, through these courses, are prone to foster their initial but real interests and thus can make more rational choice on majors when entering universities. However, secondary schooling becomes more frustrating and shallow because students ought to prepare more subjects for inevitable assessments and less focus is dedicated in each one, which mounts burden and may be less competitive comparing to overseas freshmen in colleges for being too general.
In contrast, a narrower benefits students in different conditions in more persuasive ways. Poor families, especially in counties with less fiscal support on this industry, may drop out their young offsprings if immediate or short-term rewards are not realized from educative investment whereas a certain career out of specialized training guarantees the youth's rights of education. When it comes to the brilliant minds, this pattern ensures these potential specialists a good start as the habit of concentration can be developed. Last but not least, this curriculum setup allows students a smooth fit-in of their first jobs and, if necessary and motivated, they can develop themselves generalists by the time they earn a stable income.
In conclusion, the second system seems more reasonable with the significant superiority but each can be more feasible in different regions and under various circumstances.
雅思大作文：economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger
雅思大作文題目：Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is causing damage to the environment ,and should be stopped now. Discuss both views and give your opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
作文范文：
Developed worlds have been devoting real efforts in economy growth since Industrial Revolution and have eventually succeeded in feeding their populations. Thus, some propose that stronger economy is the only approach in eradicating famine and poverty in the global context whereas some others argue that it should not be encouraged for the sake of environmental protection.
The state of being poor and hungry could indeed be improved out of economic development. The two fundamental reasons of this condition are mainly caused by the low amount of income on average and uneven social distribution. In dealing with the first, thriving businesses simply boost the social fortune like food, houses and a variety of products in aggregate, an objective and solid foundation of more resources for each member in the society. As for the second reason, it is extensively acknowledged that the majority of social resources are held by the elite groups in all social forms, but even under this circumstance, an ordinary citizen of a modern developed nation may worry less on the provision of food or welfare services comparing with a normal medieval farmer. As well as those, this method is clearly more humane and sustainable than others such as plundering other societies and eliminating the lower class.
A developing and prospering economy is commonly associated with environmental disruption. This is inevitable because people could not properly handle industrial waste with initial technology and the disposal results in pollution of all sorts. However, cleaner energy is generated and more by-products are reused and recycled with the progress of science and technology, leading to the reduction of pollution in the long term. What is more, the second idea mentioned is ridiculous and infeasible as the human survival and comfort is the top priority for common people and the authorities.
To conclude, I believe the development of economy can not be halted so more people can be relieved from poverty and hunger. Meanwhile, the awareness of protecting environment should be raised before it is too late.
雅思大作文：public museums and art galleries will not be needed
雅思大作文題目：Nowadays，Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer.To what extent you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
作文范文：
Museums and art centres have become major tourist attractions within urban areas, and yet some propose that these sites would be visited on websites for intensive spread, alternative preservation and cheaper visiting costs. This argument is partially true.
Virtual visits mainly benefits on three parties. For culture and art, pictures of artefacts and exhibits can be immediately uploaded and globally browsed, which guarantees a significantly faster and wider spread. In regard to relics and works of art, it is beneficial that their pictures uploaded and saved on servers can be easily backed up at present and their three-dimensional models will be established with the progress of virtual reality technology in the future, because they face inevitable ruin out of time and disasters. Consequently in the long run, data of these items are preserved in the form of images and models, entitling descendants to have possible visits. Lastly, viewing artworks online is obviously more economical for visitors.
However, museums and art galleries in reality should not be replaced. One of the main reasons of actual visit is that first-hand observations, embedding deeper impresions, provides better experiences because it is more enjoyable to have a close look at vivid striations on a body sculpture and have a gentle touch on rocks of a castle ramport in comparison with picutures. In addition, these sites are currently the favourite places of interst for tourists and, for the sake of the local tourism income, these attractions are still needed.
To conclude my own view, the tendency of virtualizing many activities seems to be natural and unavoidable and this argument can indeed gain its favour out of solid reasons. Nevertheless, the total replacement of physical existence of the sites will deprive people’s right to sense their real magnificence and marvel.
