雖然GRE官方公開了作文題庫，但想要全部練習(xí)一遍花費時間精力太多并不現(xiàn)實，也無法確保高分。下面小編就和大家分享GRE高分ARGUMENT作文寫法分析，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE高分ARGUMENT作文寫法分析

GRE高分Argument作文范文寫法分析

實例分析

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

參考范文

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn’t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things 　　must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

思路講解

1. 這篇GRE作文首先在字數(shù)高達599words, GRE考試雖然沒有對寫作提出明確的字數(shù)要求，但其評分時偏好字數(shù)更多的文章卻也是不爭的事實。

2. 這篇文章在結(jié)構(gòu)上采取了標準的五段式寫法，首段、末端，中間三段，整體結(jié)構(gòu)沒有出現(xiàn)頭重腳輕的問題，文章平衡性極佳。

3. 整篇文章在詞句運用上極為出彩，沒有出現(xiàn)陳詞濫調(diào)、用詞重復(fù)或堆砌句子的問題。

范文用法

對于這篇文章，最為錯誤的用法無疑就是把整篇文章囫圇吞棗一般死記硬背下來，然后上了考場進行大段默寫。假如考生這么做，一個被判雷同抄襲扣甚至取消成績的懲罰在所難免。當然大家對于其中一些精彩用詞和句子也絕對不能直接照搬，否則同樣有一定風(fēng)險。正確做法是首先理解文章優(yōu)勢，了解其在邏輯論述和遣詞造句上的精妙之處，然后結(jié)合自己的語言對文章進行改良，這樣才能最大程度上吸收到這篇文章的精華所在。

GRE高分范文這么用才有收獲

看過上面的例子，接下來小編就為大家具體介紹GRE高分范文的正確用法。

1. 首先，大家需要對范文的來源進行篩選和甄別。市面上打著高分滿分GRE范文幌子的資料很多，但其中有不少是濫竽充數(shù)之輩，所選用的文章大多本身質(zhì)量低劣根本稱不上范文。為了避免學(xué)習(xí)到這些假貨反而受到不良影響，大家首先需要找到真正高品質(zhì)的范文資源。一般來說，官方或是權(quán)威機構(gòu)出品的資料里，包含的范文質(zhì)量較高，比如官方出品的OG指南中，涉及寫作部分就有許多真正意義上的高分范文。另外諸如曼哈頓和MAGOOSH之類國外權(quán)威考試機構(gòu)的復(fù)習(xí)資料中，也有不少優(yōu)質(zhì)范文。另外，許多權(quán)威教學(xué)機構(gòu)都有自己的在線工具和?？架浖?，比如上面提到的兩家機構(gòu)，還有官方?？架浖P2，在作文部分都會配置一到兩篇高分范文給大家參考，這些文章也是極好的。

2. 其次，范文中的好詞妙句大家要消化改寫后再使用。就如同在上文真題實例分析中所說，再好的句子，也絕對沒有直接拿來就用的道理，一方面有雷同風(fēng)險，另一方面每個人的語言用詞習(xí)慣都有所不同，強行記憶和自己習(xí)慣不符的句子很容易出現(xiàn)記憶混淆，背誦錯誤的問題。所以，考生如果看到一些比較優(yōu)秀的句子，那么不妨在不影響其質(zhì)量的情況下，根據(jù)自身的寫作風(fēng)格稍作一些加工調(diào)整，消化吸收后再拿出來用到自己的文章中。

3. 再次，面對優(yōu)秀范文，切忌整篇文章死記硬背。一個原因上面說過，容易被判雷同，另一個原因則是對記憶力消耗太大，每個人的記憶力都是有限的，而GRE作文題目又數(shù)量眾多，考生如果看到一篇好文章就想要整個背下來，那么無論記性多好都會是件耗時費力的辛苦活，付出和回報完全不成比例。正確做法是學(xué)習(xí)這些文章的寫作思路。GRE作文Argument是駁論文，要求找漏洞發(fā)現(xiàn)邏輯問題，這是需要一定技巧的，哪些是主要漏洞，如何展開駁論的層次層層遞進，大家都可以通過范文來進行學(xué)習(xí)，這也是范文真正的價值所在。

4. 最后，范文中常會使用到一些不錯的素材。素材本身可能并不出奇，但恰到好處的使用卻能夠為整篇文章增光添彩?？忌灰孕鸥叻址段睦锏乃夭?，簡單粗暴地直接背素材，正確做法是學(xué)習(xí)能夠讓素材具備說服力的使用方法，比如哪些素材用在什么類型的題目，證明哪些觀點時才能發(fā)揮最大作用。學(xué)會這種素材和題目的搭配才是核心關(guān)鍵。

GRE高分范文錯誤用法注意要點講解

最后小編要特別提醒大家關(guān)于GRE高分范文的常見使用誤區(qū)?？赡苡行┛忌羞^這種經(jīng)歷，明明用了高分范文來復(fù)習(xí)，結(jié)果作文成績卻不升反降。會出現(xiàn)這種情況，正是因為大家在用法上出現(xiàn)了錯誤?？忌枰貏e注意的范文錯誤用法主要有兩種，上文也有所提及，一個是原文照抄，這是大忌，后果也非常嚴重，絕對不能犯這種錯誤。另一個是思路照搬，看到相似題目不管三七二十一直接套用范文的思路。GRE作文中存在大量形似神異的題目，看起來說的是同一件事，用的事例也相近，但作文的寫作要求和側(cè)重點卻有很大區(qū)別。大家一定要仔細審題后再確定寫作思路，切忌直接套用范文的寫作套路，一旦出現(xiàn)張冠李戴的情況，最后得分往往會慘不忍睹。

GRE寫作高分范文：想法付諸行動的困難性

It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice.

擁護革新和接受新想法很簡單。但是在大多數(shù)人們看來，最困難的是接受把這些新想法付諸實現(xiàn)的方式。

GRE寫作范文：：

The writer of the issue connotates an ironic phenomenon: though innovation is required in our era and eulogized by most people, application of it is clannished vehemently because of the fear of failure and the possibility of obtained possession and tradition impairing. The author grasps the paradox psychology of most people and pertinently reveals a universal mentality.

As is known that innovation may bring big progress and result in even a revolutionary transition of a society: the elevated efficiency of work, the ameliorated life, the enticing fruit of new technology and so on. Following with innovation of the second industrial revolution, great changes took place and immediately a renewed world unfolded before us with the application of its fruits. Seeing unimaginable profits and the magic power, who (including the society and government) can suppress their agitating desire to restrict development of innovation?

Unfortunately, innovation doesn't always follow the people's will and always acts like an uncontroled horse running in the plain. Worrying about the side-effect, people have to hold their desire back but admire those who are brave enough to taste crabs for the first time. Not everyone possesses the same courage as Biil Gate's, who dare invest on a fresh field and give up the chance of studying in Harvard University, which is the dream of most aggressive young people. Often, pondering what they have already possessed with what they might get from innovation, most people prefer the former to the latter, even content to sacrifice the latter to ensure the integer of the former. For example, a department may enroll those who are not very deft in the work but behave complaisant before higher-ups and deny to those who stick to their innovational opinion obstinately. After all, it is required more to cooperate with others harmoniously and conform to the traditional rules nowadays than to creat a new law according to individual penchant, in any company and corporation.

Maybe, some one argues that, how to cultivate innovation if personality should abdicate to interests of collective? Does the statement above alludes that employees should do nothing but keep silent and follow what the higher-ups dictated, strangling their inspiration to accord to the criterion today? No doubt, such supposition is rediculous. I mean that employees should try to approach their original though to tenet of the collective, not attempt to disobey the existed norm, respect suggestion and supposition of others and circumspect the innovation and then discuss with all the members in the company. That is, responsibility should be taken before the innovation is applied to practice.

Of course, many people don't have the ability that controling their compulsion of carrying their innovation into application. It doesn't lack of people who dare not apply innovation, and people who hold innovational thought are not scarc either, however,those who possess both of the two abilities and are lucky enough to encounter a proper opportunity to release their innovation is very few. The seperation of spirit of application and creation of innovation is the root of the the strange phenomenon, that innovation and new ideas are here and there while the acceptance and combination of them with application is too little to be heard.

GRE寫作高分范文：冒險與計劃

Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning.

在生活的所有領(lǐng)域中，成功往往更多的來自于把握機會或者冒險而不是通過仔細謹慎的計劃。

GRE寫作范文：

The speaker asserts people are more likely to attain success when taking chances or risks than planning carefully and cautiously. However, after comparing the characteristics of careful planning and taking chances, I strongly hold that they are of the same importance in the pursuit of success.

In competitive sports, while making appropriate training plans and effective competition strategies constitute necessary conditions of winning the matches, taking risks is almost inevitable when athletes or their coaches confront a sudden matter that might influence the course of a match and that has not been taken into consideration beforehand. In modern competitive sports, it is widely acknowledged that scientific and effective training contributes to athletes’ better performance during matches. Good competition strategies, on the other hand, resulting in the better allocation of physical force, better use of skills or the higher rate in scoring, also play a vital role.

However, when the star players of a soccer team or a basketball team are off the game or fail to implement their chief coach's strategic intention, leaving the whole team in adverseness, the coach faces the choice whether to substitute he/she or not. No doubt substituting a star player with a bench player means taking risk because the bench player may not perform as good as the star player and may make matters worse. If this happens, the substitution will incur discontentment of the players and critique from the team's fans, media and the boss. The capability of the coach may then be suspected and he/she may even be fired. Nevertheless, if the coach dares not to take the risk to substitute a poorly performed star player, his/her team will probably lose the game. Taking chances and risks is reasonable when one is dealing with something that has not been taken into consideration previously. So, in competitive sports, planning and risking are both necessary.

In academic fields, careful and cautious planning is required for large projects and application disciplines while revolutionary scientific breakthroughs are almost impossible without taking chances or risks. Before starting the research project on human genome, scientists had already made plans on the content and method of the research. They did not have to take any chances or risks because all they should do have already been carefully planned. There were no technical obstacles that had not been solved. Therefore, they just followed the plan step by step and accomplished the project in the end. As for significant scientific breakthroughs, they are the important discoveries and theories that disaccord, at least to some extent, with established principles or our intuitions, such as the Theory of Relativity and quantum mechanics. One has no choice but to take chances because established theories may not be applicable on the boundary of what is known and what is unknown. Only after being examined through experiments, practices and observations, can they be confirmed or belied. In a word, planning and taking chances or risks are different means for different levels of academic researches.

In the business world, cautious planning contributes to the long-term development of a company and at the same time, risking is imperative for a company to survive, develop and thrive in the highly competitive society. Planning carefully on inquiring market, training stuff and manufacturing products ensure a company's long-term development by keeping its profit increasing or at least not declining. On the other hand, taking risks, such as incorporating with another company, involving in the market fields that have already been occupied by other enterprises or involving in the market fields that are not considered so profitable, is also necessary because these may save the company from the adversity or help to set foot in new businesses. Clearly,in the business field, planning and risking complement each other.

To conclude, success in any realm of life comes equally from taking chances or risks and from careful and cautious planning. In most cases, they complement each other and pave the way towards success.