考生想要在GRE寫(xiě)作部分提分，除了重視文章結(jié)構(gòu)、句式和案例外，詞匯方面也需多加注意，特別是用詞過(guò)于單調(diào)重復(fù)，缺乏多樣性，往往會(huì)導(dǎo)致意外的扣分。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫(xiě)作常見(jiàn)易錯(cuò)扣分用詞情況，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫(xiě)作常見(jiàn)易錯(cuò)扣分用詞情況
GRE作文詞匯扣分情況分析
GRE寫(xiě)作評(píng)分中關(guān)于用詞有一個(gè)非常具體的評(píng)判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety，即通過(guò)用詞用句的變化性有效地體現(xiàn)行文語(yǔ)言的多樣性。而許多中國(guó)考生被扣分，正是因?yàn)橛迷~過(guò)于單調(diào)重復(fù)和口語(yǔ)化。特別是一些常用詞匯，只要在寫(xiě)作中出現(xiàn)就很容易造成扣分，下面小編舉5個(gè)最常見(jiàn)的不地道且常被濫用的重復(fù)詞匯：
1. Really
Example：The swimmer really performed admirably.
“Really”表示“真的”，有強(qiáng)調(diào)的作用。但很多時(shí)候“really”并沒(méi)有告訴讀者或聽(tīng)者任何重要、有用的信息，缺乏說(shuō)服力。如果你想要表達(dá)一個(gè)事實(shí)，不妨嘗試去掉“really”，反倒更讓信服。比如：The swimmer performed admirably.
2. Things/ Stuff
Example: “The article said a lot of things and stuff.”
Things和Stuff這兩個(gè)詞匯十分模糊，作者自己可以清楚地了解Things和Stuff代表的含義，但讀者顯然不能。Things和Stuff到底指什么?為什么會(huì)有Things和Stuff?我如何獲得這些Things和Stuff?這都是讀者會(huì)產(chǎn)生的問(wèn)題。所以與其圖一時(shí)省事，不如清晰地描述出你的想法，這樣你的寫(xiě)出的句子才會(huì)有力量。例如：The aricle discussed the principles of interactive design.
3. I believe/I feel/I think
Example: “I believe the author has a great point here…”
很多人認(rèn)為在觀(guān)點(diǎn)前加上“I believe/I feel/I think”可以表明立場(chǎng)，避免邏輯漏洞，也更容易讓人接受自己的想法。但如果對(duì)方本身對(duì)你的認(rèn)可度不高，你的“I believe/I feel/I think”反而會(huì)引起對(duì)方的抵抗情緒。過(guò)度小心翼翼會(huì)讓你顯得沒(méi)有自信，不夠真誠(chéng)。你完全可以說(shuō)：“The researcher has a great point here.”
4. Was/Is/Are/Am
Example: “The letter was mailed by Sally.”
使用Was/Is/Are/Am和不使用的區(qū)別在于被動(dòng)和主動(dòng)的區(qū)別。在這個(gè)例句中，Was/Is/Are/Am讓句式變成更為復(fù)雜的被動(dòng)，而在地道的英語(yǔ)思維中，應(yīng)該盡可能少地使用被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài);另一方面，當(dāng)你使用被動(dòng)句，句子的主旨也會(huì)隨之改變，從Sally變成了letter。英文寫(xiě)作要做到簡(jiǎn)潔有力，“Sally mailed the letter.”顯然比“The letter was mailed by Sally.”表達(dá)的更清晰。
5. Very
Example：Scientistsare very interested in finding out more about the duck-billed platypus“Substitute ‘damn’ every time you’re inclined to write‘very’; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it shouldbe.” — Mark Twain
very是最常被大家使用的一個(gè)單詞，但也是最蒼白的一個(gè)單詞。一句“very good”遠(yuǎn)不如“wonderful”來(lái)得生動(dòng)。要記住，讀者的時(shí)間非常寶貴，你的語(yǔ)言一定要精簡(jiǎn)。
GRE寫(xiě)作高分范文：忠誠(chéng)
GRE寫(xiě)作題目：
Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one's friends，to one's school or place of employment，or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.
大多數(shù)人被告知忠誠(chéng)是一種美德。但是無(wú)論是對(duì)朋友、對(duì)學(xué)校、對(duì)單位還是對(duì)任何機(jī)構(gòu)，忠誠(chéng)時(shí)常都是弊大于利的。
GRE寫(xiě)作范文：
I disagree with the author for he has confused the faithfulness with the misguided or overextended loyalty. In fact，loyalty does be a cherished virtue that should be given enough emphasis.
Loyalty，a kind of lasting persistence and its precondition is that the subject of fidelity is worthy of such strong emotion. In each society，loyalty is a indispensable and vital part of the system of morality. No matter in schools，at home or at work，first midst and last，people accept a similar education that as an individual，he or she should first have a sense of ligeance，that is work for the whole. Of course，the subjects of loyalty are various including scientific theory，friends，family，schools，places of employment and the nation. A vivid example can lend support to the statement is the heroical astronomer - Bronow，who advanced Copernicus' theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun，enraged the Roma church that held the Ptolemaic system of astronomy and was burnt to death just because he refused to give up his scientific theory. It is the lasting loyalty toward truth that lead Bronow to sacrifice himself. And people all respect such duteous spirit. However，without loyalty，the morality of a society will deteriorate into apathy desert and everyone just lives for him/herself，that is to say，no one is willing to pay loyalty to the whole，then finally the human civilization will fall apart.
However，on the other hand，the fidelity should not be confused with misguided or overextended loyalty and the latter is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force. People all hold that mutual loyalty between friends is the basis of lasting friendship. But people should also realize that true loyalty and authentic responsibility for a friend are not only always believing him or her unconditionally but also persuading，helping and even impeaching him or her when him or her has committed serious mistakes or even crimes. Of course，when facing up to such painful dilemma，each one will hesitate because he or she is afraid of being censured to betray his or her friend and some one may choose to keep slient in order to insist of the so-called loyalty.
In fact，such behavior may prevent his or her friend from taking right actions. The same to a school，a family，a company even the nation，when the subject that people once string along with no longer deserves loyalty，people should resolutely choose to be loyal to the truth，the justice and the humanity. That calls for people are always alert to what they think right and what they think wrong，via doing so，people can change their mind for right choice on time
To sum up，people should insist on true loyalty，and always avoid being the victim of the misguided or overextended loyalty. In the world，there is nothing that can be always absolutely right or wrong and changing happens all the time. So people should always hold deep insight to discern what deserves their loyalty and what does not
GRE寫(xiě)作高分范文：思想家
GRE寫(xiě)作題目：
Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when they claim to admire them.
大多數(shù)社會(huì)都沒(méi)把最偉大的思想家當(dāng)回事，雖然有時(shí)候這些社會(huì)自稱(chēng)是求才若渴的。
GRE寫(xiě)作范文：
In this busy，packed and dull world，people's most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money，to support their family，to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are，not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly，in some cases，people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however，they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers' thoughts are. The fact is，in history of human civilizations，most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.
Generally，whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in，they have similar characteristics，such as high intelligence，eccentric temperament，wide range of knowledge，and the most essential one： the deeply and often predicted thoughts，which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand，it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand，it is also the thoughts，however correct and predicted，which cause these elites out of the mass' sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer，whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job，Nietzche lived an impoverished life， which along with loneliness defeated him at last： he became insane when 45，and died 10 years later. Until that time，almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today，many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.
In some worse cases，the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts，which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas，which are against the old ones，are accepted by mass，the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times，most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish，however，always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people's minds beforehand，are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus，who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time，it hadn't come out of press until the year before Copernicus' death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches，which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.
