GRE寫(xiě)作想要取得好成績(jī)，參考學(xué)習(xí)一些優(yōu)秀的范文是一種很好的方法。考生常?？梢酝ㄟ^(guò)范文發(fā)現(xiàn)一些新的寫(xiě)作思路和技巧，以及地道精彩的遣詞造句。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫(xiě)作范文學(xué)習(xí)法具體步驟分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫(xiě)作范文學(xué)習(xí)法具體步驟分享
選擇有價(jià)值的GRE范文
想要用好GRE范文，大家首先要做的是挑對(duì)正確的范文學(xué)習(xí)材料。現(xiàn)在市面上有關(guān)GRE的復(fù)習(xí)教材很多，作文作為考試重點(diǎn)之一也受到了不少關(guān)注，各類范文素材類的教科書(shū)層出不窮。但這其中有不少書(shū)籍的品質(zhì)并不理想，不是內(nèi)容老舊過(guò)時(shí)就是根本文不對(duì)題。考生如果使用了這些范文教材不僅對(duì)自己毫不幫助，甚至有可能受到拖累反受其害。小編建議大家如果要學(xué)習(xí)GRE高分范文，那么最好的做法就是選擇一些官方或者權(quán)威教育考試機(jī)構(gòu)出品的優(yōu)質(zhì)范文合集來(lái)進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí)。只有選對(duì)學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)，你的GRE作文才能真正獲得進(jìn)步。
對(duì)范文的學(xué)習(xí)不能囫圇吞棗
如何才能把一篇優(yōu)秀的文章消化成自己的詞庫(kù)和句庫(kù)，并寫(xiě)好GRE作文?考生首先需要明確這樣一個(gè)概念，那就是學(xué)習(xí)就像吃飯。健康的飲食是攝入與吸收并重，而參加GRE考試并且作文復(fù)習(xí)已經(jīng)達(dá)到看范文水平的考生，相信對(duì)寫(xiě)作結(jié)構(gòu)都有了一定的了解，正在進(jìn)入寫(xiě)作學(xué)習(xí)的第二個(gè)階段：語(yǔ)言積累和應(yīng)用。吸收好的文章是提升表達(dá)多樣性和表達(dá)難度最快的方法。而吸收的方法和步驟，將很大程度決定考生復(fù)習(xí)的效率和成果。
GRE高分范文學(xué)習(xí)法分享
1. 準(zhǔn)備優(yōu)質(zhì)范文的word版。word自帶校驗(yàn)功能，能很方便地找出一些拼寫(xiě)和用詞上的低級(jí)錯(cuò)誤。
2. 畫(huà)出自己認(rèn)識(shí)但是寫(xiě)作的時(shí)候又想不到用的表達(dá)。認(rèn)識(shí)說(shuō)明你背到過(guò)，想不到說(shuō)明你還不會(huì)運(yùn)用?？忌岩呀?jīng)掌握的詞匯庫(kù)充分運(yùn)用起來(lái)。
3. 生詞和表達(dá)多樣性要單獨(dú)羅列在段落下面，方便總結(jié)和參考。
4. 翻譯成正常的漢語(yǔ)，翻譯成漢語(yǔ)有助于加深理解，并為后面步驟做好準(zhǔn)備。
5. 看著漢語(yǔ)再次翻譯成英語(yǔ)。這個(gè)步驟其實(shí)也就是改寫(xiě)，是幫助大家擺脫模板，寫(xiě)出自己風(fēng)格的文章必須經(jīng)歷的過(guò)程。
6. 對(duì)照原文找差異，尤其是好的內(nèi)容必須會(huì)寫(xiě)，而其他的大概意思符合原文即可。
GRE寫(xiě)作高分范文：過(guò)度專業(yè)化問(wèn)題
GRE寫(xiě)作題目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”
近些年來(lái)，學(xué)科已經(jīng)細(xì)化到了相當(dāng)?shù)某潭纫灾劣趯W(xué)者們的理念只影響小范圍的人群。除非學(xué)者們能擁有影響等大范圍的人群，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無(wú)用處。
GRE寫(xiě)作范文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a
new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!
From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
GRE寫(xiě)作高分范文：權(quán)威問(wèn)題
Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多數(shù)人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)際上都是不準(zhǔn)確的。因此，任何據(jù)稱是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)該被質(zhì)疑，因?yàn)樗趯?lái)很可能會(huì)被證明為是錯(cuò)誤的。
GRE寫(xiě)作范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of
cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
