在雅思寫作中，再好的模板(好的句式)，你再好地去運用，如果沒有合理的思維，沒有邏輯，分數(shù)就是5.5分及以下。今天小編給大家?guī)砹搜潘紝懽魈嵘驹谒季S與邏輯而非語言,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學習吧。

雅思寫作提升根本在思維與邏輯而非語言

常見的雅思寫作思路

你可能想到的是，“不同意(少了一些語言，生活不會變?nèi)菀仔?”，因為少了一些語言，“部分民族文化就會消失”。這個點是存在問題的，因為沒有答題?！吧倭艘恍┱Z言，部分民族文化就會消失”，和“生活不會變?nèi)菀住庇惺裁绰?lián)系呢?感覺是2個無關的句子。

這個答案會導致什么樣的問題呢?評分標準Task Response沒有達到。有什么辦法補救呢?(想想民族文化的部分消失和生活不會變簡單有什么聯(lián)系)

可以考慮的答案是：少了文化特色，旅游就少了，旅游帶來的經(jīng)濟增長就少了，錢少了自然生活就變難了。

那這是一個好的答案嗎?梳理一下以上的推理，就可以推出來：

語言的消失-民族文化的部分消失-旅游較少了-旅游帶來的經(jīng)濟增長就減少了-錢少了生活就困難了。

推理越長，就可以湊到越多的字數(shù)?

請盡早摒棄這樣的想法。

我們來這樣思考一下：

①某種語言的消失，能導致這個民族的文化有多大部分消失?②這部分民族文化的消失，能導致旅游減少多少?(只有一點點)③旅游減少了，對當?shù)亟?jīng)濟的影響有多大?只要不是旅游國家或者旅游城市，影響就很小。那又有多少個主要靠旅游發(fā)展的國家和城市呢?所占比例非常小!

上面那些影響的大小是怎么估算出來的?通過日常的知識積累(平時一定要多接收信息，多思考)。一個推出另一個，但是推出可能性都不是100%，那么第一個推到最后一個，可能性是多大呢?可能性會隨著中間層級的數(shù)量的增加而減小。其實每次往前推，可能性都會變小，所以不要把推理做“長”了。

綜上，這是一個不好的雅思寫作論證。

其實我們在答題的時候，一般會想到很多相關的信息,而不是一開始就想到最可靠的信息。然后，我們應該去斟酌并篩選出強的論證，(丟掉弱的論證)。

回到題目，有什么更好的答案呢?

考慮如下論證：

1. 每種語言有自己的發(fā)音特點，和當?shù)厝说纳硖卣飨喾Q。換句話說，當部分語言消失時，部分人就要學習和自己生理結(jié)構不相稱的語言，生活變難(比如，硬要日本人說英語)。

2. 一門獨立的語言，包含很多表達當?shù)厝颂攸c(感情，性格，思考方式等)的詞和表達方式(想想那些只有當?shù)厝寺牭枚淖盅?;統(tǒng)一化的語言常常沒有這么精細。這樣，當部分語言消失時，人們想表達的某些感情和個性就無法表達了，生活變難。

在雅思寫作中，高大上的分論點是得分的關鍵嗎?還是普通的觀點配上優(yōu)秀的語言?

這就是典型的語言重于思維。

如果我漢語不好，就無法表達我以上的意思，你會順著看到這里嗎?或者，我不能夠有效地表達自己的意思，能讓你學會這些東西嗎?語言的重要性是極高的。

如果只靠語言，那么你就不必刷題了，因為你去背一篇語言完美的文章，考試的時候直接默寫下來就可以了。這顯然是不行的，再好的模板(好的句式)，你再好地去運用，沒有合理的思維，雅思寫作就是5.5分及以下。

兩條腿走路，思維和語言都很重要!

那么，如何能練出合理的雅思寫作思維?

擴大你的知識量

多看《網(wǎng)易公開課》，尤其是里面的《TED》?！墩Z言如何改變?nèi)祟悺?“27個盟國，說著23種語言，你需要253人的翻譯隊伍”)如果你看過上面這個視頻，回答這個題目就會容易很多。

刷題

一起來看到這樣三個分論點：

1. 跨文化交流變得容易 2. 獲得資訊變得容易 3. 學習變得容易

其實這是有方法的。不過是把life分成了以上3個方面而已，這叫做分類法。多刷題，就會找到解題的各種套路!

雅思寫作Task2社會類考官范文

The world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population, This is causing problems not only for poor, undeveloped countries, but also for industrialised and developing nations.

Describe some of the problems that overpopulation causes, and suggest at least one possible solution.

Model Answer:

In most countries of the world the population is increasing alarmingly. This is especially true in poor, undeveloped countries. Overpopulation causes a considerable number of problems.

In poor countries it is difficult to provide enough food to feed even the present number of people. In addition, education to limit the number of children per family is not always successful. Poorer countries usually have a lot of unemployment too, and an increase in population simply makes the situation worse. The environment also suffers when there are too many people living on the land.

In rich, industrialised and developing countries it is very difficult for governments to provide effective public services in overcrowded cities. Moreover, there is usually a great deal more crime, which is often due to high rates of unemployment. Further large increases in population only cause more overcrowding, unemployment and crime.

There are two main solutions to the overpopulation problem. Firstly, every woman who is pregnant, but who does not want to give birth, should be allowed by law to have an abortion. Secondly, governments must educate people to limit the size of the family. In China, couples are penalised financially if they have more than one child. This may seem cruel, but the "one-child policy" is beginning to have an effect in the world's most populous nation. Eventually, similar policies might also be necessary in other crowded nations such as India, for example.

To sum up, if the population explosion continues, many more people will die of starvation in poor countries, and life in the cities, even in affluent nations, will become increasingly difficult.

雅思寫作Task2社會類考官范文

"Although abuse of the system are inevitable, social welfare payments are essential to protect the rights citizens have to a guaranteed minimum income in a democratic society".

Discuss.

Model Answer:

Social welfare is an essential element of an advanced society. Good systems are always abused, but that does not mean they are faulty. In my opinion, the two main reasons why welfare payments are necessary are as follows:

First of all, critics forget that there are many forms of welfare besides payments to the unemployed. Their negative opinions harm those who are not capable of earning a wage, such as single-parent mothers, the disabled, and the sick. Moreover, the unemployed have the right to an income, too. They are not always at fault for not having a job, and in most cases the tax they have paid in the past entitles them to assistance.

The second reason is that crime increases when people have no means of support. The desperately poor inevitably turn to crime, which is not only dangerous but costly. Policing the streets is more expensive than providing welfare. A policeman's wage is four or five times higher than a "dole" payment.

Certain members of society believe that people should look after themselves. They point out that welfare increases dependency on others and destroys dignity. This may be true, but in the case of the unemployed, the relief payments are usually temporary. It is surely the fault of the government if there are long-term unemployed. Welfare critics also believe that it is the responsibility of a victim's family to provide financial assistance. However, it is too expensive to provide complete help for a severely disabled person.

To conclude, it is vital to understand the need for welfare in a modern democratic society. Without welfare payments the poor are destined to become poorer. The first duty of a government is to provide a financial safety net for all disadvantaged persons, and that includes those without work.