GRE寫作高分只靠單純的寫作技巧并不夠，在論述中考生需要通過一些精選句式來體現(xiàn)英語積累和水平。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作提升論述水平格言金句，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作提升論述水平格言金句

1. Waste not,want not.

儉以防匱。

2. From saving comes having.

富有來自節(jié)儉。

3. A penny saved is a penny gained.

省一文是一文。

4. Take care of the pence and the pound will take care of themselves.

金錢積少便成多。

5. Frugality is an estate alone.

節(jié)儉本身就是一宗財產。

6. He that regards not a penny,will lavish a pound.

小錢不知節(jié)省，大錢將濫花。

7. Small gains bring great wealth.

積小利，成巨富。

8. Many a little makes a mickle.

積少便成多。

9. As the touchstone tries gold,so gold tries man.

試金之石可試金，正如黃金能試人。

10.Courage and resolution are the spirit and soul of virtue.

勇敢和堅決是美德的靈魂。

11.The path to glory is always rugged.

光榮之路常坎坷。

12.Nothing is difficult to the man who will try.

世上無難事，只要人肯試。

13.The fire is the test of gold;adversity of strong man.

烈火試真金，困苦煉壯士。

14.Great hopes make great man.

遠大的希望造就偉大的人物。

15.No way is impossible to courage.

勇士面前無險路。

16.A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.

平靜的大海決不能造就出熟練的水手。

17.The good seaman is known in bad weather.

壞天氣下才能識得出良好的海員;要識好海員，須憑壞天氣。

18.The best hearts are always the bravest.

行為最勇敢的人心地總是最善良。

19.We must not lie down,and cry,God help us.

求神不如求己。

20.He that falls today may be up again tomorrow.

今天跌倒的人也許明天就會站起。

GRE寫作滿分范文

The?University?of?Claria?is?generally?considered?one?of?the?best?universities?in?the?world?because?of?its?instructors'?reputation,?which?is?based?primarily?on?the?extensive?research?and?publishing?record?of?certain?faculty?members.??In?addition,?several?faculty?members?are?internationally?renowned?as?leaders?in?their?fields.??For?example,?many?of?the?faculty?from?the?English?department?are?regularly?invited?to?teach?at?universities?in?other?countries.??Furthermore,?two?recent?graduates?of?the?physics?department?have?gone?on?to?become?candidates?for?the?Nobel?Prize?in?Physics.??And?75?percent?of?the?students?are?able?to?find?employment?after?graduating.??Therefore,?because?of?the?reputation?of?its?faculty,?the?University?of?Claria?should?be?the?obvious?choice?for?anyone?seeking?a?quality?education.??

While?it?is?true?that?the?facts?presented?in?the?above?passage?contribute?to?the?idea?that?the?University?of?Claria?is?a?fine?university,?it?can?hardly?be?concluded?from?the?propaganda?that?the?University?of?Claria?is?the?best?university?for?every?applicant.??For?example,?it?appears,?based?on?the?passage,?that?the?University?of?Claria?is?largely?a?research-oriented?university.??No?where?in?the?passage,?however,?is?the?quality?of?the?education?discussed.??The?faculty/student?ratio?is?not?discussed.??It?is?largely?possible?that?while?many?of?the?faculty?are?teaching?at?universities?in?other?countries,?the?students?at?U.?Claria?are?left?being?taught?by?graduate?students?or?non-doctoral?instructors.??

Secondly,?the?passage?states?that?75?percent?of?graduates?from?U.?Claria?find?jobs.??One?wonders?where?these?graduates?obtained?their?jobs.??It?is?possible?that?very?few?graduates?are?able?to?find?work?in?their?fields?of?major.??The?number?of?graduates?who?enroll?in?graduate?school?is?also?not?disclosed.??One?would?expect?a?large?number?of?graduates?from?a?research-oriented?university?to?pursue?research?careers.??These?students?would?undoubedtly?require?a?graduate?school?education,?rather?than?simply?a?Bachelor's?level?degree.??By?stating?that?75?percent?of?graduates?find?employment,?the?reader?is?left?to?wonder?why?these?students?entered?the?workforce,?rather?than?graduate?school,?since?graduates?with?Bachelor's?level?degrees?often?do?not?land?research-oriented?jobs.??

Lastly,?the?socioeconomic?status?of?the?institution?is?not?disclosed.??Perhaps?the?University?of?Claria?is?an?expensive?school?located?in?the?heart?of?a?large?metropolitain?city.??Certain?prospective?applicants?to?the?university?may?not?be?able?to?afford?such?a?costly?school,?nor?may?the?like?the?idea?of?living?in?a?crowded?metropolis.??The?fact?that?the?argument?leaves?our?the?socioeconomic?status?of?the?school?leads?the?reader?to?believe?that?the?school?perhaps?has?something?to?hide;?perhaps?its?socioeconomic situation?is?not?something?it?is?proud?of.??In?addition?to?the?"sales?pitch"?passage,?above,?the?argument?should?include?facts?that?a?diverse?group?of?students?may?find?useful,?such?as?the?cost?of?education?and?the?quality?of?its?teaching?program.??Only?after?evaluating?all?the?facts?might?a?student?strongly?agree?that?the?University?of?Claria?is?one?of?the?best?universities?in?the?world.??

Commentary??

The?University?of?Claria?is?generally?considered?one?of?the?best?universities?in?the?world?because?of?its?instructors'?reputation,?which?is?based?primarily?on?the?extensive?research?and?publishing?record?of?certain?faculty?members.??In?addition,?several?faculty?members?are?internationally?renowned?as?leaders?in?their?fields.??For?example,?many?of?the?faculty?from?the?English?department?are?regularly?invited?to?teach?at?universities?in?other?countries.??Furthermore,?two?recent?graduates?of?the?physics?department?have?gone?on?to?become?candidates?for?the?Nobel?Prize?in?Physics.??And?75?percent?of?the?students?are?able?to?find?employment?after?graduating.??Therefore,?because?of?the?reputation?of?its?faculty,?the?University?of?Claria?should?be?the?obvious?choice?for?anyone?seeking?a?quality?education.?

GRE寫作滿分范文

Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??

The?arguement?is?well?presented?and?supported,?but?not?completely?well?reasoned.??It?is?clear?and?concisely?written.??The?content?is?logically?and?smoothly?presented.??Statistics?cited?are?used?to?develop?support?for?the?recommendation,?that?roller?skaters?who?invest?in?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment?can?reduce?their?risk?of?severe,?accidental?injuries.??Examples?of?the?types?of?protective?equipment?are?described?for?the?reader.??Unfortunately,?the?author?of?the?argement?fails?to?note?that?merely?by?purchasing?gear?and?reflective?equipment?that?the?skater?will?be?protected.??This?is,?of?course,?falacious?if?the?skater?fails?to?use?the?equipment,?or?uses?it?incorrectly?or?inappropriately.??It?is?also?an?unnecessary?assumption?that?a?skater?need?purchase?high-quality?gear?for?the?same?degree?of effectiveness?to?be?achieved.??The?argument?could?be?improved?by?taking?these?issues?into?consideration,?and?making?recommendations?for?education?and?safety?awareness?to?skaters.??

Commentary??

The?first?half?of?this?generally?well-written?but?limited?response?merely?describes?the?argument.??The?second?half?of?the?paper?identifies?two?assumptions?of?the?argument:??

--?that?people?who?purchase?protective?gear?will?use?the?gear?--?that?high-quality?gear?is?more?effective?than?other?gear??

These?points?are?sufficient?to?constitute?some?analysis?and?thus?warrant?a?score?of?3.??However,?neither?of?these?analytic?points?is?developed?sufficiently?to?merit?a?score?of?4.