對(duì)不少備考GRE的考生來說，GRE寫作拿到滿分似乎是一件MISSION IMPOSSIBLE的事情，不過，如果能掌握一些要點(diǎn)和技巧，充分準(zhǔn)備下也未必就無法取得滿分，下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作如何沖刺高分，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作如何沖刺高分

GRE寫作滿分要點(diǎn)和技巧建議：必須研究范文

研究范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文是非常重要的。因?yàn)榉段目梢哉f是最權(quán)威的輔導(dǎo)資料。要求不是簡(jiǎn)單的熟讀和背誦，而是逐字逐句的體會(huì)作者的意思及修辭?？捶段牡耐瑫r(shí)也要看ETS對(duì)范文的評(píng)論，非常精彩，也可以參考學(xué)習(xí)。這會(huì)非常有利于理解考試所考的重點(diǎn)。

GRE寫作滿分要點(diǎn)和技巧建議：必須要熟練

必須要做到形成慣性思維，考試時(shí)間非常緊張，只有有充分思維準(zhǔn)備的人，才能駕輕就熟，運(yùn)用自如。題目中提到politics，大腦中就應(yīng)當(dāng)出現(xiàn)Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Schroeder， Gandhi; 提到art，就該想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh， Starry night， night watch， Hemmingway， the old man and the sea; 提到Scandal，就該想到Nixon，Watergate，bill Clinton，sex sandal，Enron?？傊?，熟練非常重要.

GRE寫作滿分要點(diǎn)和技巧建議：借鑒別人的文章

學(xué)習(xí)他人的文章和寫作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途徑。參考優(yōu)秀的高分滿分作文，學(xué)習(xí)詞匯和句式的用法，總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn)心得，對(duì)于自己的提升也是巨大的。

GRE寫作滿分要點(diǎn)和技巧建議：多動(dòng)腦筋多思考

多寫不如多改，多改不如多想，針對(duì)寫作思路，自我總結(jié)，思考適合自己的寫作方式，思考自己擅長(zhǎng)的論證方法，總之，要多想?；钴S思維的同時(shí)也提高了思考能力。

GRE寫作滿分要點(diǎn)和技巧建議：通讀GRE作文題庫(kù)

GRE作文的題庫(kù)是完全開放的，考前把題目都過一遍，了解其中的思路和寫作方式，在考試中碰到可以大量節(jié)省時(shí)間，提高寫作效率。

以上就是GRE寫作拿到滿分的一些要點(diǎn)和技巧建議，GRE高分甚至滿分作文需要生動(dòng)的詞匯及正確的語法、嚴(yán)密的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)，新鮮的論據(jù)等，希望各位考生都能從中學(xué)到一些東西，預(yù)祝大家取得圓滿的成績(jī)。

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??

"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??

The?argument?presented?above?is?relatively?sound,?however,?the?author?fails?to?recognize?all?the?elements?necessary?to?evaluate?his?situation.??The?idea?that?more?money?be?invested?in?advertising?may?be?a helpful?one,?but?perhaps?not?because?people?are?unaware?of?the?current?reviews.??To?clarify,?it?may?be?necessary?to?advertise?more?in?order?to?increase?sales,?however?that?could?be?due?to?many?circumstances?such?as?a?decrease?in?the?public's?overall?attendance,?an?increase?in?the?cost?of?movies,?or?a?lack?of?trust?in?the?opinions?of?the?reviewers.??

The?advertising?director?first?needs?to?determine?the?relative?proportion?of?movie?goers?that?choose?to?see?Silver?Screen?films.??That?will?help?him?to?understand?his?market?share.??If?the?population?in?general?is?attending?less,?then?he?may?still?be?out-profiting?his?competitors,?despite?his?individual?sales?decrease.??In?fact,?his?relative?sales?could?be?increasing.??Determining?where?he?stands?in?his?market?will?help?him?to?create?and?implement?an?action?plan.??

Another?important?thing?to?consder?is?the?relative?cost?of?attending?movies?to?the?current?standard?of?living.??If?the?standard?of?living?is?decreasing,?it?may?contribute?to?an?overall?decrease?in?attendance.??In?that?case,?advertising?could?be?very?helpful,?in?that?a?clever?campaign?could?emphasize?the?low?cost?of?movies?as?compared?to?many?other?leisure?activities.??This?could?offset?financial?anxieties?of?potential?customers.??

Finally,?it?is?important?to?remember?that?people?rarely?trust?movie?reviewers.??For?that?reason,?it?is?important?that?the?films?appeal?to?the?populus,?and?not?critics?alone.??The?best?advertisement?in?many?cases?is?word?of?mouth.??No?matter?what?critics?say,?people?tend?to?take?the?opinions?of?friends?more?seriously.??This?supports?continual?funding?to?produce?quality?movies?that?will?appeal?to?the?average?person.??

There?is?no?reason?that?silver?screen?should?not?spend?more?on?advertisement,?however,?there?is?reason?to?continue?to?invest?in?diverse,?quality?films.??Furthermore,?the?company?must?consider?carefully?what?it?chooses?to?emphasize?in?its?advertisement.??

Commentary??

Although?the?response?begins?by?stating?that?the?argument?"is?relatively?sound,"?it?immediately?goes?on?to?develop?a?critique.??The?response?identifies?three?major?flaws?in?the?argument?and?provides?a?careful?and?thorough?analysis.??The?main?points?discussed?are?that??

--?the?fall-off?in?attendance?might?be?industry?wide?

--?the?general?state?of?the?economy?might?have?affected?movie????attendance?

--?movie?goers?"rarely?trust?movie?reviewers"??

Each?of?these?points?is?developed;?together?they?are?presented?within?the?context?of?a?larger?idea:?that?while?spending?more?money?on?advertising?may?be?helpful,?the?company?should?"continue?to?invest?in?diverse,?quality?films."??

This?is?a?smoothly?written,?well-developed?analysis?in?which?syntactic?variety?and?the?excellent?use?of?transitions?make?for?a?virtually?seamless?response.??This?paper?clearly?merits?a?score?of?6.

GRE寫作高分范文：公正的法律

“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws?！?/p>

有兩種法律：公正和不公正的。每個(gè)社會(huì)成員都有責(zé)任遵守公正的法律，但更重要的是，更應(yīng)該不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。

關(guān)鍵詞：obey just lawsdisobey and resist unjust laws

GRE寫作范文：

論證分析

當(dāng)我們面對(duì)司法改革，提出探討司法理念時(shí)，往往會(huì)以“什么是司法的公正”、 “什么是法官的美德”等這樣的形式提出問題。這種形式的問題所問的是關(guān)于一般的公正和美德的問題。在司法的實(shí)踐中，對(duì)于具體的判決，人們一般是能夠評(píng)判是否公正的，而問題是評(píng)判有無共性呢?如果不存在，那么人們的評(píng)判又是以什么為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的呢?如果存在，那它又是怎樣存在的呢?存在于哪里?而依照西方哲學(xué)的觀點(diǎn)，這種存在于我們可感知的具體事物之外的東西就是法的理念。

眾所周知，亞里土多德曾說過，要實(shí)現(xiàn)法治必須具備兩個(gè)因素：其一，所有人都服從法律;其二，被遵守的法律本身是良好的法律。 亞里土多德的說法看似全面，但在實(shí)踐中可能并不有效。

比如什么是良法，比如有人對(duì)允許墮胎、 安樂死、 同性戀的法律持有尖銳不同的觀點(diǎn)。人認(rèn)為允許墮胎維護(hù)了女性的自身權(quán)利，允許安樂死和同性戀表現(xiàn)了對(duì)個(gè)人自由意志和愿望的尊重;有人則認(rèn)為允許墮胎是不人道的，沒有保護(hù)胎兒的生存權(quán)利，允許安樂死違背了人的生存主旨，允許同性戀則敗壞了社會(huì)的道德風(fēng)氣。在這種情況下，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定誰的觀念是正確的?

我們又依據(jù)什么權(quán)力和所謂的理性剝奪和否定另外一些人的觀念呢?此外，人們對(duì)某一事物的好壞認(rèn)識(shí)會(huì)隨時(shí)間的推移而發(fā)生變化，從前認(rèn)為良好的法律現(xiàn)在可能認(rèn)為不好，這時(shí)又怎么辦呢?

因此，當(dāng)認(rèn)為某些法律不是良好的法律時(shí)，人們便會(huì)認(rèn)為自己沒有服從的義務(wù)，這樣便會(huì)出現(xiàn)不服從法律的現(xiàn)象。進(jìn)而言之，堅(jiān)持“良好的法律”這一概念可能會(huì)使法治處于困難的境地。

Should we obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests. Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general will. An individual who disagrees with a law must be failing to look at things from the moral standpoint. Rousseau is talking about an ideal state where laws express people's general will, a will that aims at the common good. But the question is: are we living in an ideal state and do all the laws of our land express the common will of the people and should we obey all the laws even if they are unjust? Thenswer to this question can be different for different people.