你知道你在哪里丟了gre寫作分數(shù)嗎?下面小編就和大家分享gre寫作的丟分點盤點，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

gre寫作的丟分點盤點

1. gre寫作丟分點之論證不足

gre考試寫作Argument即駁論文，需要對題干進行全面的審查，找到原文中論述的一些邏輯漏洞加以攻擊。查找漏洞，提出論點，闡述論證確立自己的觀點的過程就叫做論證。換句話說，論證就是用一個或一些已知為真的判斷確定另一個判斷的真實性的思維過程。所謂論證過程，就是用嚴格的邏輯規(guī)則由論據(jù)得出論點的過程。所以，如果論點的得出過程理由不夠充分，或論點總結(jié)不夠準確，這篇文章的論證過程就是不嚴謹?shù)摹?/p>

gre寫作雖然主要是針對邏輯錯誤進行攻擊和論證，但只是理論上的論述會顯得文章死板，不易理解，適當(dāng)?shù)呐e例會讓論證顯得更加具有說服力，同時也能豐富文章內(nèi)容，提升文章的可讀性。

2. gre寫作丟分點之缺少論據(jù)

gre寫作要求考生論證充分，論據(jù)有力，考生基本上都能夠針對找出的邏輯錯誤進行充分論證，但是缺少例子和細節(jié)，文章說理就會顯得十分蒼白無力，所以gre寫作分數(shù)不高，也有可能是這份不造成的。

論據(jù)就是為論點提供的證據(jù)，通過論據(jù)，可以加深論點的準確性，使論點更加準確，更加能夠讓人信服。所以考生要在文章中盡量做到細節(jié)的豐富和量化，很多時候細致的例子能夠彌補遣詞造句上的不足。具體應(yīng)做到以下幾點：

1)論據(jù)要來源于生活，要具有生動的論述效果。不能過于空洞，也不能脫離現(xiàn)時，否則就失去了舉例的意義。

2)要客觀表達。雖然來源于身邊社會，但不能主觀臆斷。

3) gre寫作中舉例常見的表達方式如for example,/for instance, (后加句子)Such as/ like (后加詞組)，Take... as an example, A case in point is that...等。

3. gre寫作丟分點之邏輯混亂

考生在進行g(shù)re寫作之前，一定要先把題干弄明白，準確找出題干中的邏輯錯誤，然后再進行下一步的寫作，這對于把握gre寫作的文章內(nèi)容和邏輯思維非常重要?？忌枰獙徍妙}，審清題在很大程度上關(guān)系到整篇文章的成敗，絕不可以掉以輕心。不僅要仔細研究題目，還要結(jié)合gre寫作常見的邏輯七宗罪進行仔細分析。首先要明確文章要寫的內(nèi)容，這是保證整篇文章切題的關(guān)鍵;其次，確定文章所需的主語人稱，人稱混亂是中國考生常犯的一個錯誤;第三，注意文章對動詞的時態(tài)、語氣的特殊要求。

gre寫作更注重的是文章的整體感覺，從備考指導(dǎo)中的高分作文范例可以看出，即使整個論述只有1條主線，只要前后聯(lián)接得自然流暢，并能一步一步引導(dǎo)讀者向結(jié)論靠近，就是好文章。增強gre寫作的邏輯性考生可以從以下幾個方面入手：

1) 掌控題目中的邏輯鏈。這是gre寫作的根本，也是前提。

2)根據(jù)邏輯漏洞的個數(shù)列出文章的主要提綱。這樣既能體現(xiàn)出文章結(jié)構(gòu)的清晰，又能在內(nèi)容上體現(xiàn)出詳略得當(dāng)，順序合理。

3)根據(jù)所列提綱進行邏輯論證時重中之重。

GRE作文范文：如何避免偏激

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

GRE作文范文參考：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

GRE作文范文：想法付諸行動的困難

Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.

GRE作文范文參考：

In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.

Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.

This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.

Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.

To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.