托福獨立寫作對于考生觀點的選擇是非常重視的，而很多人在選擇觀點時，可能會因為過于注重論述難度而忽視了觀點立場選擇的問題。下面小編就和大家分享托福寫作觀點選擇立場問題詳解,來欣賞一下吧。

托福寫作觀點選擇立場問題詳解 這些雷區(qū)請不要誤踩

托福寫作觀點要切題有較強關(guān)聯(lián)性

比如：圖書館投資書還是計算機話題，有人說買計算機好是因為：計算機的屏幕看起來很舒服，而且可以越做越大(圖書館是用來獲得信息的，大屏幕計算機有點奢侈吧?不是主要理由);有人說計算機對現(xiàn)代人很重要找工作都要求計算機能力，所以投資計算機。(這個干脆就跑題了。他應(yīng)該是用來說明大學(xué)里開始計算機課是必須的這個話題的。)

對不同托福作文題目的論點不能過于道德低下或高尚

比如：用計算機打字好還是筆寫好，有人說打字好，這樣寫威脅信不會被識破。為錢工作還是為興趣工作，有人說為興趣工作，認為錢根本不重要，只要自己感興趣，完全可以不要錢，"全心全意為人民服務(wù)"了，好象連BASIC NECESSATIES 都不要，餓著肚皮就可以工作了。(應(yīng)該說錢不是首要目的，有一些能夠滿足生活的基本需要就行了，不能成為工作的唯一目的。)

觀點不能違背話題的一般性

比如：圖書館投資書還是計算機話題，有人說我們圖書館早已經(jīng)配備好的全新的PII了，不用再投資計算機了，全部去買書吧。這就違背了話題的愿意：把兩種信息的媒介對比優(yōu)勝劣汰。

盡量避免涉及各類敏感話題

比如政治類話題，或者老外特別敏感的性別種族歧視等等，這些大家都需要特別小心才是。當(dāng)然，這類題目托福官方只會比我們更小心，畢竟ETS自己也是美國的本土教育機構(gòu)，不過大家還是需要稍微留個心眼的。

可以看出托福寫作備考時不光要討論內(nèi)容和立意是否完整，還要小心托福作文題目內(nèi)容的“對錯”，雖然托福寫作沒有絕對的正誤，但還是要避免一些問題的。

托?？荚囎魑莫毩懽鞣段模盒W(xué)生應(yīng)多學(xué)科技嗎

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: primary schools should spend more time on teaching young students (5-11years old) technology (like computer) than teaching music and art.

托福寫作范文參考:

The question of “ what is the most important subject or skill the elementary schools should teach? ” has never failed to attract attention from educators, school administrators and even politicians especially when it comes to subjects like technology, or music and art. Some argue that school should spend more time teaching technology than music and art. Personally, I am not in favor of this position based on the following reasons.

Admittedly, with the advent of internet and state-of-art gadgets like laptop, tablets, being able to use computers skillfully is being considered as a valuable quality. However, early exposure to computers and other kinds of technological products might bring lots of risks and problems to kids’ future development. Recently research by National Society of Psychiatrists shows that exposure to computers at an early age leads to addiction to computers when they grow older and obviously spending too much time in front of the computer can pose a threat to kids’ health, to be more specific, it leads to neck problems, nearsightedness, backache and even childhood obesity. Moreover, instead of getting addicted to playing on-line games and watching meaningless videos, kids should have spent more time focusing on their academic study, or even learning how to appreciate artwork or music. Indeed, spending more time learning art and music not only benefits the kids, but also it is conducive the community as whole.

First off, learning art and music at an early age helps to develop creativity and make the kids more imaginative. Actually, lots of scientific research in the psychological field shows that early exposure to art and music not only boosts academic achievement but also promotes creativity, self-confidence and school pride; kids who spend more time in learning art and music end up having higher analytical thinking and reasoning skills than kids who don’t.

Additionally, spending more time teaching kids music and art can can benefit the whole community. Music and art are a very important part of people’s lives. They are necessary for people to express their emotions, like happiness, sorrow, and even anger regardless of cultural background, ethnicity, age and even gentle. It is very urgent to spend more time teaching kids knowledge about art and music since they bring change, facilitate innovation and help to unite the community. They are the reminder of the past and maker of tomorrow, they also help to convey ideas and different perspectives. More importantly, art and music have great cultural significance, by learning art and music kids will have a strong sense of cultural identity and sense of belonging to community, eventually the traditional values and culture can be passed down to the younger generation.

To conclude, it is more advisable to spend more time teaching kids art and music than technology since not only can art and music benefit the individual kid but also it benefits the community as a whole.

托福考試作文獨立寫作范文：政府為民眾免費提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)

(A/D) The government should offer internet access to all of citizens at no cost.

點睛

題目大意：政府應(yīng)該為民眾免費提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)。此題較為簡單，思路也有很多。建議選擇不同意，即認為政府不應(yīng)該為民眾免費提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)，因為一方面會加重政府的財政負擔(dān)，另一方面會讓更多人上網(wǎng)成癮，進一步疏遠人際關(guān)系。

寫作參考一:

With the advent of internet, people in growing numbers are getting addicted to logging onto the internet out of various purposes, which has aroused deeply social concern. Therefore, the issue of whether the bills of using the Internet should be paid by the government or the users themselves has been open to debate. In my opinion, it is more reasonable to require the individuals to cover the fee of internet usage, with the reasons as follows.

To begin with, the users of the internets are supposed to pay the bills in order to relieve the financial burden of government. With the popularization of the internet, the number of people going online every day has increased to a lot, which means that the money spent on the internet is tremendous. Such a large sum of money can do nothing but occupy a great propotion of the governmental expenditure, thus cutting down on the investment of government on other more pressing fields like improving the public transportation and eradicating the poverty. By contrast, if the fee of internet usage comes from the wallet of the individual, the situation will become totally different. To illustrate, the abundant financial resources of government saved by this practice can better facilitate the economic development and render the life of the mass more convenient and comfortable.

In addition, requiring the individuals to pay for the bill of internet access will help to establish better social relationship between people. As is common sense, with the wide application of electronic devices boosted by easy access to the internet, people especially younsters are indulged in the cyber or virtual world created by the social network and various Apps on the cell phone. Consequently, it is not uncommon to observe that when a group of white collars sit at a table in a restaurant waiting for their meals, they watch the screen of their smart phones instead of interacting with the guys near them, which greatly alienates the bond between them. In this case, the free use of internet will aggravate this situation to a large extent. However, if the fee of the internet usage is covered by the individuals instead of the government, many people will be reduce their time spent in surfing the internet in order to save money. As a result, the face-to-face communication will become more frequent and thus the closer and more intimate relationship between people will be set up.

Factoring the above listed reasons, it is safe to conclude that the government should not offer internet access to all of citizens at no cost, in order to relieve financial burden of the government and to build a better rapport between people.

寫作參考二:

With the advent of the information age, internet and advanced technological gadgets are becoming more and more accessible, actually they are now as important as basic necessities in life like water supply and electricity. When it comes to the question of whether government should provide free internet access to all citizens, personally I am in favor of this initiative based on the following reasons.

Admittedly, providing free internet access to the public in schools, shopping malls, tourist spots and even households might incur some financial burden to the city since the government has to invest in the infrastructure and networks and even dedicate staff members to maintain the operation, however, it is well worth the effort and financial resource to provide such service.

First off, internet now is an indispensable part of people’s lives, and we simply cannot live and work without it. Providing free internet service can make people’s lives more convenient and bring efficiency to working places. For example, college students can utilize internet to send emails to inquire professors about certain issues in the academics, use different kinds of online service to assist their study. Internet makes it possible for professors to involve multimedia in the their classrooms, making the class more interactive and engaging. Also, businessmen can capitalize on the internet and monitor various data like management cost, profit, asset and liability, ultimately they can avoid certain financial loss and make more profit. Generally, internet makes lives more convenient, citizens can use location based apps to find restaurants, museums, sports centers, etc. Apart from that, internet brings a more connected community and facilitates interaction between citizens and businesses. More importantly, a city with free internet access in public places will see its popularity boosted and attract people to move in or visit.

Additionally, providing free wifi access to everyone is a very conducive tool for empowerment and social engagement, shortening the gap between the rich and the poor, the underprivileged and the privileged. Actually, internet access, cell phone contracts, and data plan can be very expensive and not very affordable to people with lower incomes. Providing free internet service to these people gives them life changing opportunities, like job hunting, on-line course, and even health advice. Consequently, providing free internet service can be a great tool for empowerment and social involvement.

To conclude, providing free internet service to citizens has lots of benefits since internet makes people’s lives more convenient and brings efficiency to working places, more importantly, providing free internet service can be a great tool for empowerment and social involvement.