模板和提綱哪個(gè)重要呢?今天小編給大家?guī)?lái)GRE寫作：模板和提綱哪個(gè)重要，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作：模板和提綱哪個(gè)重要

(1)早點(diǎn)整理出自己的模板，什么是模板，應(yīng)該怎么準(zhǔn)備，會(huì)在下面的部分為G親們說(shuō)明，所以不用著急。

(2)考試的時(shí)候順序把握好，先讀題，形成思路和粗略提綱敲首段，中間每段的主旨句和過(guò)渡段，最后敲尾段，根據(jù)時(shí)間，有層次地補(bǔ)充豐滿每段的內(nèi)容檢查拼寫語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤，平時(shí)練習(xí)的時(shí)候就是不斷地重復(fù)這樣的順序，做到非常熟悉。

(3)狂寫，練打字速度，尤其是練自己的模板、固定段落、常用事例的打字速度。當(dāng)初用Issue部分的時(shí)間就可以把Issue和Argu全部寫完，Issue上600，Argu上550;平時(shí)正常寫的話，Issue可以上700，Argu上600，靠的就是固定段落、事例還有模板的打字特別快，基本上Issue模板250字在幾分鐘之內(nèi)就搞定了，Argu的模板就更夸張了，總共才500多字，模板就有一大半，而且基本上幾分鐘之內(nèi)就可以完全打完。

在備考新GRE作文的過(guò)程中，其實(shí)是否準(zhǔn)備網(wǎng)絡(luò)流傳的“高頻”題目并不重要，而重要的是，無(wú)論準(zhǔn)備什么題目，都能有正確的思考路徑和分析方法，并且能夠用正確的語(yǔ)言來(lái)表達(dá)自己的想法。

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??

Generalists?have?the?ideas?and?beliefs?of?what?America?is?made?of.?America's?wealth?of?knowledge?can?be?related?to?the?generalists?of?the?past?generations?and?the?original?leaders?of?our?Constitution?Period?that?helped?shape?our?great?nation.?If?our?former?leaders?would?have?not?been?generalists?when?creating?our?country's?Constitution?in?the?late?1770's,?American?generations?of?would?have?been?burdened?with?the?constant?understanding?that?they?are?doomed?to?failure.??

The?fact?that?our?past?leaders?were?not?specialists?gave?the?creation?of?the?Constitution?the?ability?to?be?changed?through?amendments?passed?by?our?represented?leaders?of?today.?The?Constitution?was?created?with?the?ability?to?adapt?to?the?countries?needs?and?demands?in?running?our?society?as?it?changes?over?time.?The?generalists?approach?to?this?creation?of?a?non-specialized?Constitution?shows?the?need?for?todays?generations?to?continue?with?the?beliefs?that?a?specialist?would?not?follow.??

America?has?learned?from?it's?past?and?has?done?what?it?can?to?make?the?changes?through?adaption.?America's?greatness?has?been?from?the?generalist?leaders?of?the?past,?thinking?for?the?Americans?of?the?future.?Americans?with?a?broad?perspective?is?what?will?continue?to?lead?our?great?nation?into?the?twenty-first?century.??

COMMENTARY?

This?response?displays?some?competence?but?is?flawed?by?imprecise?use?of?language?and?limited?analysis?of?the?issue.??

The?writer?supports?the?claim?that?generalists?are?preferable?to?specialists,?offering?as?evidence?the?historical?example?of?the?generalists?who?created?the?U.S.?Constitution.?The?example,?while?relevant,?is?not?adequately?developed.?The?middle?paragraph?traces?the?flexibility?of?the?U.S.?Constitution?to?the?generalist?orientation?of?18th?century?leaders,?but?the?ideas?in?the?first?paragraph?are?too?vaguely?expressed?to?contribute?to?this?discussion,?and?the?final?paragraph?consists?of?unsubstantiated?generalities.??

Frequent?minor?errors?in?punctuation,?pronoun?use,?and?verb?tense,?as?well?as?imprecise?syntax?and?phrasing?(e.g.,?"Generalists?have?the?ideas?and?beliefs?of?what?America?is?made?of.?"?and?"...gave?the?creation?of?the?Constitution?the?ability?to...")?contribute?to?the?overall?inadequacy?of?this?response.

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??

The?need?for?generalists?is?undeniable?but?one?can?not?underestimate?the?need?and?importance?of?specialists.?The?medical?profession?is?a?good?example?of?an?area?that?requires?both?generalists?and?specialists.?If?there?were?no?generalists?in?the?profession?there?would?be?no?one?to?help?patients?determine?when?a?specialist?was?needed.?There?are?certain?problems?that?a?general?practitioner?can?take?care?of?and?there?are?other?problems?that?are?out?of?his?or?her?league.?The?general?practitioner?is?the?an?appropriate?place?to?start?when?a?patient?develops?a?problem.?Many?times?the?general?practitioner?is?more?than?capable?of?handling?problems?that?arise?and?other?times?he?or?she?is?unable?to?fully?take?control?of?the?patient's?care.?It?isn't?a?fault?with?the?general?practitioners.?There?is?just?too?much?to?know?for?any?one?person?to?be?an?expert?on?all?topics.?It?takes?people?years?to?become?experts?on?a?single?topic,?never?mind?being?an?expert?on?everything?in?the?medical?profession.??

I?am?currently?working?in?a?large?teaching?hospital?where?the?need?for?both?general?practitioners?and?specialists?is?obvious.?When?a?patient?is?admitted?to?a?general?medicine?floor,?the?general?medicine?physicians?are?not?always?able?to?deal?with?every?problem?the?patient?has?without?some?help?from?the?specialists.?It?would?be?unrealistic,?not?to?mention?unfair?to?the?general?practitioners,?to?expect?the?general?practitioners?to?know?everything?about?everything.?The?key?is?to?know?where?everyone's?knowledge?and?area?of?expertise?lie?and?use?their?strengths?to?optimize?patient?care.??

On?the?general?medicine?team?in?which?I?worked,?the?team?would?constantly?be?requesting?consults?from?specialists.?Whether?it?be?a?renal,?psychiatric,?orthopedic,?rehabilitation,?speech,?gastroenterologist,?or?any?other?specialist,?their?input?was?constantly?needed?and?used?to?get?the?patient?well?as?quickly?as?possible.?The?list?of?specialists?can?go?on?longer?than?one?would?think?and?it?is?just?impossible?for?one?person?to?know?everything?about?each?one?of?them.??

Although?the?need?for?generalists?is?apparent,?it?would?be?hard?to?survive?without?specialists,?also.?When?a?person?acts?as?a?generalist,?they?know?little?bit?about?everything,?but?certainly?not?a?totally?inclusive?knowledge?of?everything.?The?specialist?is?there?to?help?add?the?expertise?and?inclusive?knowledge?that?the?generalist?may?be?lacking.?The?most?important?thing?to?remember?with?specialists?and?generalists?is?to?recognize?both's?strengths?and?weaknesses?and?capitalize?on?the?strengths?to?achieve?whatever?goal?may?be?desired.??

COMMENTARY?

Overall,?this?is?a?competent?response?to?the?topic.?The?writer?disputes?the?claim?that?"specialists?are?over-rated"?and?argues?from?the?position?that?both?specialists?and?generalists?are?needed.?The?single?extended?example?clearly?supports?the?premise?of?the?argument?as?the?writer?compares?the?roles?and?responsibilities?of?generalists?and?specialists?in?the?medical?profession.?By?paragraph?3,?however,?the discussion?falters,?and?the?concluding?paragraph?does?little?more?than?repeat?ideas?presented?in?the?first?two?paragraphs.??

This?essay?displays?generally?adequate?control?over?syntax?and?usage,?and?the?word?choice,?while?appropriate,?lacks?precision.?