怎么模仿GRE寫作范文?今天小編給大家?guī)鞧RE寫作：怎么模仿范文，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作：怎么模仿范文

1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是帶有說理性的文章)。

2.你要理解這個文章，理解它的用詞、句子結(jié)構(gòu)、段落結(jié)構(gòu)。

3.這些文章都有正確的中文翻譯。同時，文章的長度不能超過500字。

怎么模仿，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么關(guān)系。我給大家舉個例子：美國人寫作文的一個特點是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的內(nèi)容，也就是我們常說的topic sentence.。另一個特點是當(dāng)你寫完一個句子后，你要問WHY。你提出一個問題，然后給出一個圓滿的回答，這就是一篇優(yōu)秀的作文。

再下一步就要具體了。寫作需要三大能力：

一、具體化的能力

具體化并不代表要寫一個完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要給人一個具體的意向。通過具體的東西來描述才能給人踏實的感覺。具體化只要舉出幾個地方、幾個名字、幾件小事就可以了。

為什么好多同學(xué)作文中分數(shù)很低呢，就是因為他提出了問題卻沒有回答。

你通過不斷地模仿寫作，就可以不斷地糾正語法和詞組錯誤。如何把抽象和具體結(jié)合起來是一個重點，如何在一個段落中只表達一個思想，這是另一個重點。美國人的判分特點是，如果你在一段中表達了一個以上的思想，那你的分數(shù)就不會高了。

分析完一篇文章后，怎么模仿著寫呢?就是看著中文的翻譯，把上面的英文一字不落的寫下來，當(dāng)你實在想不起來的時候，再看原文。等到寫完之后，和原文對照一下，看看是誰寫得漂亮。我剛剛開始模仿寫作的時候發(fā)現(xiàn)，模仿了幾天后，寫作水平的確提高了。

因為根據(jù)記憶學(xué)原則，這個單詞你背過、讀過，它都不能寫在你的文章中間。如果一個單詞可以經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)在你的腦子和文章中間，那這只證明了一件事，就是你寫過這個字。但是你自己寫作你不可能用到這個字，那就只有一個可能，就是你在模仿文章時寫過這個字。如果一個結(jié)構(gòu)別人寫不出來，你能寫出來，那你的分數(shù)就會高。

通過不斷地模仿你的幾大能力就會得到提高：

1.你的語法錯誤會越來越少;

2.句子結(jié)構(gòu)能力越來越強;

3.用詞能力大大增加。

一篇文章模仿兩次就足夠了。當(dāng)你模仿了10篇文章之后，你把這10篇文章再模仿一遍。等你模仿完20篇文章，你的寫作能力就會大大提高了。

二、邏輯思維能力

在美國許多的寫作考試中TOEFL寫作是相對容易的。因為它的作文題本身非常簡單，看到一個作文題你幾乎就知道該怎么寫。而GRE作文就相對復(fù)雜了。 GRE作文方式永遠是兩種態(tài)度，兩種方式讓你選擇。它永遠是有對照性的。

托福作文考：“吃飯是在家里吃好，還是到飯店里吃好”; GMAT考和商業(yè)有關(guān)的：“產(chǎn)品制造出來是延續(xù)時間很長的好，還是延續(xù)時間不太長的好”;GRE作文：“在我們這個社會中間，現(xiàn)在專業(yè)人士太多了，而有綜合知識的人太少了。你認為我們是更需要具有專業(yè)知識的人呢，還是需要具有廣博知識的人?”

TOEFL考生活、學(xué)習(xí);GRE 考日常學(xué)術(shù)行為。但是不管它出什么題目，總是會擺出兩種態(tài)度供你選擇。另外，GRE的作文題目是提前發(fā)給你的，考試時出的題目絕不會超出它事先發(fā)給你的題目。它決不會出讓學(xué)生看不懂的題目。所出的題目永遠是世界性的，不涉及民族、宗教、政治色彩。

考察普林斯頓所出的全部范文后發(fā)現(xiàn)，美國人百分之七八十喜歡傾向于一種模式。討論在哪里吃的問題時，要不在家里吃，要不在飯店吃，但是你不要又想在家里，又想在飯店(A　OR　B)。當(dāng)然他們也比較認可中間的態(tài)度(C)，也就是說，我既要A又要B，我是A和B結(jié)合起來產(chǎn)生C。事實上，好多中國學(xué)生結(jié)合 A、B寫是能寫出好分數(shù)的。當(dāng)然也有些題目是沒有C這種態(tài)度的。

C態(tài)度這種寫法和A、B的寫法，在段落結(jié)構(gòu)上是有差異的。我先講兩種文章的段落結(jié)構(gòu)。

如果是采取A或B的寫法，段落結(jié)構(gòu)是比較簡單的。通常分為三個層次，第一個層次是第一段。說明我要采取A還是B。第二個層次可以不只一段，說明為什么選擇A/B是對的。為什么要有三段呢。因為必須至少有2個理由，至多3個理由。美國人認為一個理由是不夠的，4個理由絕對太多。他們最喜歡 2到3個理由。最后一段就是結(jié)尾，討論B的缺點和部分優(yōu)點，同時堅決強調(diào)你要選擇A。

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing."

I disagree with the argument that "Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing."" Arguments can be made for this thesis, but they depend largely upon what I believe to be a poor definition of "loneliness".

If one defines loneliness as the absence of as much physical, face-to-face contact with other people, then this argument is probably true. The invention of modern telecommunications devices such as telephones, fax machines, and computers has definitely cut down on the amount of physical contact with other people. This is especially true in recent times due to the extremely rapid expansion of the Internet. E-mail and tele-conferencing are direct substitutes for physical contact, especially in the business world.

However, I believe that loneliness can be better measured by intellectual contact with other individuals. Unarguably, modern technology makes this faster and easier, with better communication with a larger number of people. Some employers have argued that productivity is lessened since they have had computers linked to the Internet, as the employees spend much of their time "chatting" with friends, acquaintances, or business contacts across the country. This is probably not a good thing for the employers, but it demonstrates the increased degree of communication due to modern technology.

Of course, some technologies have increased loneliness by any standards, such as the automobile or other transportation mechanisms. These encourage substantially longer commutes between home and work. Automobiles have made possible the pattern of suburbanization that has been in place in the United States since immediately after World War Two. Time spent commuting is generally unproductive and spent alone, unless the individual in question is car-pooling or using mass transit. The contribution of the commuting culture to loneliness may actually be changing now due to new technology that is being invented and used by the general public. Popular new devices, such as the cellular phone, the laptop computer, and the combination thereof may actually convert commuting time to a period of increased communications between people, to "pass the time". This will be especially true as use of mass transit grows, which will probably happen, due to problems with gas shortages, air pollution, and the creation of further mass transit by federal and local governments.

The motivation for the declaration that loneliness is increasing may be due to the fact that many people, especially blue-collar workers, are unable to afford or use these new devices. However, since the advent of the personal computer, the price per computing power has continually lowered rapidly, and this trend shows no sign of changing. Several companies, such as Sun Microsystems and Oracle have announced that they are attempting to develop terminals with little computing power, but a full capability to access the Internet. These devices will be in approximately the $500 price range, which is much more reasonable than the price of the current top of the line PC. In addition, to cater to a larger mass of the public, software companies have been carefully making their products easier to use by non-"computer nerds". This trend is not likely to cease.

In conclusion, although early development of modern transportation may have increased loneliness, I believe that more recent technologies are actually doing the opposite, stimulating interpersonal contact and encouraging intellectual expansion. The perception that the opposite is true derives from what I believe is poor definition of loneliness and the difficulty that the working class has in acquiring and using modern telecommunications devices.

Comments:

This strong response analyzes the complexities of the issue. In disagreeing with the prompt, the writer makes a distinction between two types of loneliness -- loneliness caused by "the absence of??? physical contact" and loneliness brought about by a lack of "intellectual contact" with others. The writer reasons that while "the automobile and other transportation mechanisms" originally kept passengers physically and intellectually isolated from one another, modern technology, such as the cellular telephone and laptop computer, has made intellectual contact "faster and easier" and has benefited users by allowing them to communicate with "a larger number of people."

Using clear and relevant examples of cell phones and the internet, the writer examines the impact of user-friendly telecommunications on the individual's ability to interact with others even when physical distance separates the communicating parties.

The organization is clear, yet transitions between paragraphs are not always smooth. The body of the response lacks the focus that would help move it to a score of 6. It is not always clear how the information given relates to the writer's initial position (e.g., the discussion of current prices for personal computers in paragraph five). The conclusion, while clearly relevant, attempts to impose order on the somewhat loosely connected paragraphs, yet fails to add substance to the analysis.

On the whole, the paper displays clarity and control, but the language is sometimes imprecise and less tightly controlled than it would be in a 6 essay. The following sentence is one such example: "The motivation for the declaration that loneliness is increasing may be due to the fact that many people, especially blue-collar workers, are unable to afford or use these new devices."

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing."

Technology, broadly defined as the use of tools, has a long history. Ever since Erg the caveman first conked an animal with a rock, people have been using technology. For thousands of years, the use of tools allowed people to move ever closer together. Because fields could be cultivated and the technology to store food existed, people would live in cities rather than in small nomadic tribes. Only very lately have Erg's descendants come to question the benefits of technology. The Industrial Revolution introduced and spread technologies that mechanized many tasks. As a result of the drive toward more efficient production and distribution (so the ever larger cities would be supported), people began to act as cogs in the technological machine. Clothing was no longer produced by groups of women sewing and gossiping together, but by down-trodden automation's operating machinery in grim factories.

The benefits of the new technology of today, computers and the internet, are particularly ambiguous. They have made work ever more efficient and knit the world together in a web of information and phone lines. Some visionaries speak of a world in which Erg need not check in to his office; he can just dial in from home. He won't need to go to a bar to pick up women because there are all those chat rooms. Hungry? Erg orders his groceries from an online delivery service. Bored? Download a new game. And yet...

Many people, myself included, are a little queasy about that vision. Erg may be doing work, but is it real work? Are his online friends real friends? Does anything count in a spiritual way if it's just digital? Since the Industrial Revolution, we have been haunted by the prospect that we are turning into our machines: efficient, productive, souless. The newest technologies, we fear, are making us flat as our screens, turning us into streams of bits of interchangable data. We may know a lot of people, but we have few real friends. We have a lot of things to do, but no reason to do them. In short, the new technology emphasizes a spiritual crisis that has been building for quite some time.

As I try to unravel which I believe about the relative merits of technology, I think it is instructive to remember technology's original result. A better plow meant easier farming, more food, longer lives, and more free time to pursue other things such as art. Our newest technology does not give us more free time; it consumes our free time. We are terminally distracted from confronting ourselves or each other. We stay safe, and lonely, in our homes and offices rather than taking the risk of meeting real people or trying new things.

While I am certainly not a Luddite, I do believe we need to look for a bit more balance between technology and life. We have to tear ourselves away from the fatal distractions and go out into the world. Technology has given us long lives and endless supplies of information. Now we need to apply that information, use the time we're not spending conking our dinner with a club, and find our reasons for living.

Comments:

This outstanding response displays cogent reasoning, insightful, persuasive analysis, and superior control of language. The response immediately identifies the complexities of the issue and then playfully explores both the benefits and the drawbacks of technological developments over the course of human history. The writer maintains that a "balance between technology and life" is necessary if humans are going to abate the loneliness that is part of modern existence.

In contrasting the intended purpose of technology at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution with the end result of the use of today's technology, the writer skillfully expands the initial position and makes a sound point: "While technological developments have helped society in a practical way, they have contributed to a spiritual crisis that has been building for quite some time."

The analysis is tightly organized. With well-chosen examples and a character called Erg, the response moves well beyond a listing of examples, developing the analysis over five focused paragraphs, each building on the previous one. The conclusion -- that as a result of technology the individual begins to lose sight of the need to connect with fellow citizens in a meaningful way -- follows directly from the preceding paragraphs, while adding substantive analysis.

This writer is clearly in command of language and syntax, varying the sentence structure to express concepts succinctly. Word choice is generally precise and often highly effective, as in the following examples: "down-trodden automation," and "haunted by the prospect that we are turning into our machines: efficient, productive, soulless."