gre寫作考試練習題怎么做?今天小編給大家?guī)韌re寫作考試練習題怎么做，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

gre寫作考試練習題怎么做

如何突破gre寫作獲得4分，是很多備考gre考生心中的疑問。由于新gre寫作的邏輯辯證思維很好，所以很多考生的得分都很低。因此，今天的gre備考攻略，天道留學小編就這個現(xiàn)象談一下原因，然后在給出具體的解決方案，希望可以給大家的gre備考帶來幫助!

一、3大gre寫作得分低的原因分析。

第一點：多數(shù)報考gre考試的考生都是傾向于去臨陣磨槍，語言上雖然慢慢向規(guī)范的英文書面語靠攏，但仍缺乏時間上的沉淀而無法達到gre寫作本身的語言精練，一步到位的特點。僅僅做到了形似而神不似。因此觀點寫得稍好一點的同學，就可得到那0.5，如果有語言做支持，就可上到4。

第二點：gre寫作練習題是給定的，經(jīng)過幾年下來的前人總結，機考本身已經(jīng)毫無懸念。高頻，模板，例證，范文，大量資料充斥在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上并且被專業(yè)人士和機構總結印刷成冊?？忌鷤冎讳N在考前花兩三個月集中練習，得個申請的分數(shù)根本不成問題?；A好的人更是一兩個月已足矣。但問題也隨之而來了，大家都用著同樣的參考資料不說，寫作水平也都如出一轍，考官看來也就無法分辨孰好孰壞，唯有給出最安全的分數(shù)。

第三點：大部分的寫作還停留在臨摹而不是獨立作品的階段。因為有著現(xiàn)成的模板和例證，在范文的引導下，模仿寫作的結構和觀點。所以往往造成一篇作文看起來是那么回事兒，但實際上又沒有說透的感覺。對題目的意義和作文目的的把握還缺少透徹的理解。所以導致大部分雖然在考前付出無數(shù)汗水和努力的考生到最后沒能達到理想4分。

二、4大提升技巧助陣gre寫作考試。

第一方面：模板要合理利用。因為這實在是一個可以讓初學者一目了然，直奔主題的好東西。什么是結構，模板就是結構。模板是骨架，是支撐，但不是靈魂。靈魂的部分當然是文章的主旨，要靠自己在不懈的寫作，不斷的鉆研中去摸索和尋找的。千萬不可以依賴模板。一篇沒有靈魂的骨架子是沒法得高分的。

第二方面：練習是一定要堅持得，從始至終。而且量變到質(zhì)變的突破是需要時間的。

第三方面:臨考前的水平測試是為了讓大家去把握時間，更好的進一步的查缺補漏。在考場上，更是要臨危不亂，無論出現(xiàn)什么樣的題目，相信自己，都是見過的，萬變不離其宗，這當然需要練習時不斷去完善自己的知識庫。 　　以上就是小編對gre考試寫作門檻突破的分析。新gre作文的難度大深圳地產(chǎn)網(wǎng) 1111家有目共睹，那么考生就更應該在新gre寫作中加把勁，相信自己的實力一定能行。

第四方面：本來就單調(diào)的英語，重復是大忌。所以對于詞匯來說，作文需要的高級仍然是那幾個，therefore， however， admittedly。機器或者考官一見，馬上會鎖定，懂得寫議論文，就靠它們幾個。另外一些常用動詞名詞等實詞的同義詞要多背幾組，英語的修辭不在華麗，在變幻。句型要多變，表達同種意思的詞當然也要變幻。本來就單調(diào)的英語，重復是大忌。

GRE Argument寫作范文

題目：

"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town---Adams Realty and Fitch Realty---Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams."

范文：

The author argues that Adams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty. To support this claim the author cites statistics about the number and working hours of agents, and the number and sales prices of homes sold by the two farms. Further, the author cites anecdotal evidence involving personal experience with Fitch and Adams. A careful analysis reveals that this evidence it lends little credible support for argument.

The Claim is partially based on the fact that Adams has more agents than Fitch and that many of Fitch's agents work only part-time. There is no correlation between the number of employees, their working hours and the quality of their work. Without such a link, we could consider the possibility that a smaller firm could be more effective than a larger one and, likewise, that a part-time agent could be more effective than a full-time agent. Besides, the author does not provide any information about the specific number of Adams agents who work part-time.

The claim is also supported by the fact that Adams sold more properties than Fitch last year. One year of sales records is an insufficient sample. It is possible that in most other years Adams could have sold fewer properties than Fitch. Moreover, the disparity in sales volume could be explained by factors other than the comparative quality of the two firms. For example, perhaps Adams serves a denser geographic area or in an area where turnover in home-ownership is higher for reasons unrelated to Adams' effectiveness. It is even possible that the only reason sales volume is higher at Adams is because the company employs more agents but, perhaps, each Adams agent sells fewer homes on average than each Fitch agent does. Without ruling out such alternative explanations for the disparity in sales volume, the author cannot defend the conclusion based on such scant evidence.

Support for the claim is also drawn from the average sales price of homes. This evidence only illustrates that the homes that Adams sells are more valuable on average than the ones that Fitch sells, not that Adams is more effective in selling homes than Fitch. Moreover, it is possible that a few relatively high-priced or low-priced properties skewed these averages, rendering any conclusions about the comparative quality of the two firms based on these averages irrelevant.

The author of the argument indicates that Fitch Realty took a considerably longer time to sell one of the author's homes than it took Adams Realty to sell another one of her homes ten years earlier. However, this disparity can be explained by other plausible factor, for example, changing economic conditions during that ten-year period or a difference in the desirability of the two properties. Without establishing that all other factors affecting the speed of a sale were essentially the same for the two homes, the author should not expect an audience to make a decision on this limited anecdotal evidence.

GRE Argument寫作

題目：

The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis:

"Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted a large area of severely substandard housing near the freeway for use as an industrial area. Subsequently, several factories were constructed there, crime rates in the area declined, and property tax revenues for the entire city increased. To further revitalize the city, we should now take similar action in a declining residential area on the opposite side of the city. Since some houses and apartments in existing nearby neighborhoods are currently unoccupied, alternate housing for those displaced by this action will be readily available."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

范文：

The planning department for the city of Transopolis recommends, as part of its urban renewal plan, that the city convert a troubled residential area into an industrial park and relocate residents from that area to nearby unoccupied housing. To support this recommendation, the planners point out that ten years ago the city converted an area of substandard housing on the other side of town, near a freeway, for industrial use, and that afterwards the area's crime rate declined while the city's overall property-tax revenue increased. While the recommendation is a sensible one, the argument itself needs to be further developed.

To begin with, the recommendation relies on two assumptions about the effects of the freeway-area conversion. One such assumption is that the freeway-area conversion caused the decline in that area's crime rate. The mere fact that the conversion occurred just prior to the decline does not sufficiently link the decline in crime to the development. It is possible, for example, that ramped up efforts on behalf of the local police got the riff-raff off the streets. However, common sense dictates that when you remove the criminals from troubled urban areas, the crime rate declines. The author of the argument needs to establish that link more effectively.

Another such assumption is that the increase in overall property-tax revenue indicates an increase in tax revenue from properties in the freeway area. Perhaps property-tax revenue from the converted properties remained the same, or even declined, after the conversion, and that the city's overall property-tax revenue increase was attributable to properties located elsewhere in the city. For that matter, perhaps the city raised its property-tax rates shortly after the conversion. In short, without ruling out alternative explanations for the developments that came after the freeway-area conversion, the planners cannot convince me that the conversion was responsible for those developments. However, common sense dictates that with industrial development, economic development follows. The author of the argument needs to establish that link more effectively.

While considering these two assumptions, one needs to consider that even if these links can be drawn, the recommendation is based on a more troubling assumption: that the proposed conversion would carry the same results as the freeway-area conversion. To consider the recommendation, one needs to pay closer attention to the key differences between the two areas that might undermine the comparison. For example, perhaps the properties surrounding the ones converted in the freeway area were not residential. Common sense dictates that occurrences of crime are less likely to occur in areas where few low class people reside. Since at least some nearby housing is available for residents displaced by the proposed conversion, this conversion might not result in any significant decline in the area's crime rate. At the same time, unless unoccupied nearby housing can accommodate all displaced residents, the conversion might create a homelessness problem, thereby undermining the city's objectives.

gre寫作考試練習題怎么做相關文章：

★ GRE寫作提分必備9個精彩句式用法介紹

★ 黨課考試試題練習題

★ 手把手教你攻克GRE長閱讀

★ 詳解GRE考試寫作提綱的使用

★ 黨員考試練習試題