《牛津英語詞典》破例更新!收錄20個(gè)新冠肺炎相關(guān)詞匯，你認(rèn)識(shí)幾個(gè)?今天小編給大家?guī)?0個(gè)新冠肺炎相關(guān)詞匯,希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
《牛津英語詞典》破例更新!收錄20個(gè)新冠肺炎相關(guān)詞匯，你認(rèn)識(shí)幾個(gè)?
新冠肺炎，居家隔離， 方艙醫(yī)院，呼吸機(jī)，防護(hù)服...三個(gè)月前，絕大多數(shù)中國人對(duì)上面這些詞匯都感覺很陌生，有些詞甚至是這次疫情中新創(chuàng)造出來的。
而現(xiàn)在，它們充斥在各大媒體的報(bào)道中和我們每個(gè)人的日常對(duì)話中。
當(dāng)今世界上最全面和最權(quán)威的英語詞典——《牛津英語詞典》最近就因疫情進(jìn)行了一次破例更新。 收錄了一些在新冠肺炎疫情中出現(xiàn)頻率很高的英文單詞和詞組。
包括： Covid-19 infodemic R0 self-isolation self-quarantine social distancing WFH PPE to flatten the curve social recession elbow bump
這里賣個(gè)關(guān)子，先不放單詞釋義?；蛟S有同學(xué)知道所有這些單詞和詞組的意思嗎?那你最近沒少看英文報(bào)道喔~釋義版見文末。
一、熱度上升最快的英文單詞
在過去的四個(gè)月中，有兩個(gè)英文單詞熱度躥升極快： coronavirus 冠狀病毒 COVID-19 新型冠狀病毒病
但你知道嗎?在2020年之前，coronavirus 這個(gè)單詞在醫(yī)學(xué)和科研領(lǐng)域以外還很罕見。 COVID-19 這個(gè)詞更是在今年2月份才被創(chuàng)造出來。
而現(xiàn)在，主流英語媒體在報(bào)道疫情的時(shí)候，都會(huì)使用 coronavirus 和 COVID-19 來指代新冠病毒。
不過它們?cè)诟鞣N媒體上，常會(huì)以不同的變型出現(xiàn)。
例如把coronavirus簡(jiǎn)寫成 corona，COVID-19 簡(jiǎn)寫成covid。 在社交媒體上，甚至還有更短的簡(jiǎn)寫，如 rone和 rona。
其中有兩個(gè)簡(jiǎn)寫：nCoV 和 2019-nCoV 在2月份時(shí)，曾被媒體廣泛使用，但此后出現(xiàn)的頻率就沒那么高了。
二、新冠疫情給語言帶來的影響
從2020年1月~3月，出現(xiàn)頻率最高的20個(gè)熱門詞匯中可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，1月開始，跟新冠有關(guān)的詞匯的使用頻率開始增加，但尚未在新聞中占據(jù)主導(dǎo)。
其他的時(shí)事詞匯如 bushfire(澳洲山火)、koala(考拉)、impeachment(彈劾特朗普)、locust(蝗蟲)的熱度還是比較高的。
但到了3月份，最熱門的20個(gè)關(guān)鍵詞全部與新冠有關(guān)。值得注意的是，從1月到3月，跟新冠有關(guān)的關(guān)鍵詞出現(xiàn)了一些變化。
1月份，新冠熱詞多與病毒的名稱和癥狀有關(guān)。 如：coronavirus(冠狀病毒) SARS(非典) 病毒(virus) 人傳人(human-to-human) respiratory(呼吸道) flu-like(類似感冒)
而到了3月份，新冠熱詞開始轉(zhuǎn)向病毒所帶來的社會(huì)影響和醫(yī)療問題。
如 ： social distancing(社交疏遠(yuǎn)) self-isolation、self-quarantine(自我隔離) lock down(封鎖) non-essential(非必要，如非必要旅行) postpone(推遲) PPE(Personal Protective Equipment，個(gè)人防護(hù)設(shè)備) ventilator(呼吸機(jī))
《牛津英語詞典》在更新中說，很多在當(dāng)前疫情危機(jī)中廣泛使用的單詞和詞組，并非是全新創(chuàng)造，只是這些用法在今年以前比較少見。
例如，WFH(居家工作)這一縮寫用法是最早出現(xiàn)在1995年，但詞典的執(zhí)行主編帕頓指出，在今年以前，很少有人知道這個(gè)縮寫。
PPE(個(gè)人防護(hù)設(shè)備)的出現(xiàn)可以追溯到1977年，以前主要是醫(yī)療和急救專業(yè)人員使用。
social distancing 這個(gè)詞是1957年首次使用的。最初是指一種冷漠或有意與他人在社交上保持距離的行為。但在疫情中，這個(gè)詞指的是;保持與他人的身體距離。
雅思大作文模板：讀書比看電視好嗎
Some people think reading stories in book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
雅思大作文模板范文參考：
Reading stories in books is a basic way for children to obtain knowledge and open their minds. Although watching TV and playing computer games are also popular educational methods among children, reading bookstore, in my view, is still better because of effectiveness and health.
Compared to TV and games, learning by reading is more effective since it is a synthetic skill. Like any other skills, reading takes practice. Children learn to read by sounding out the letters and finding the meaning of the words. Then, they begin to comprehend the context, paragraph and chapter. To fully understand the content, children have to give all their attention to the text. Also, more than just understanding a certain topic, children tend to develop reasoning, imagination and critical thinking during reading books, which will help them to learn more efficiently and deeply in the future.
In addition, reading books is good to children’s eyesight. According to some researches, spending too much time before a computer screen or watching TV will lead to shortsightedness. Therefore, reading is better for both efficiency and health purpose.
Admittedly, the knowledge disseminated by vivid pictures on screen is easier for children to catch information, but too many moving objects and colorful images will distract children, especially to some young kids, from their primary tasks. Moreover, using TV and computers too long will lead to a sedentary life that is more harmful to one’s wrist and back.
In conclusion, reading stories in book is better than TV and computers for it is a more effective way to learn and better for health.
雅思大作文模板：面試可不可靠?
Interview is the basic form of selecting procedure for most large companies. Some people think it is unreliable. There are some other better methods. Do you agree or disagree?
雅思大作文模板范文參考：
It has been a wide-spreading method for many large companies to select potential employees through interviews. Nevertheless, the reliability of this means is among some people’s consideration and they suggest there exist other superior ways in completing the process of selection.
From my point of view, interviews are a comparatively reliable means to select talents and should still be regarded as a main method for companies. First of all, unlike some other selection methods, for instance, taking written exams, interviews produces instant and mutual communication between interviewers and interviewees which not only allows interviewers to know better about the interviewees’ responding competence but also their true personal abilities since the answers could not be prepared in advance and there are not the so-called “standard answers”.
Additionally, interviews enable interviewers to meet interviewees in person. It is quite important because interviewers can use this opportunity to observe interviewees from a more comprehensive way including their appearance, manners, etc, especially for some positions which need employers to communicate with other people for instance teachers and those who work in the PR section.
Moreover, interviews make it possible for interviewers to ask further questions which make the whole selection process more personal-oriented and flexible. Undoubtedly, people may give various answers towards the same question, with the means of interviews, interviewers can bring forward different further down questions and dig in as much as they want so as to better test the interviewees’ problem-solving competence.
Based on the several aspects discussed above, the reliability of interviews is comparatively high and should be carried on in the process of selecting employees.
