家都知道，托福寫作包含兩個部分，滿分為30分，但是托福寫作是如何評分的呢?今天小編給大家?guī)砹送懈懽髟u分標準詳細解讀 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學習吧。

托福寫作評分標準詳細解讀

一.托福寫作分為綜合寫作和獨立寫作

托福寫作包括兩部分，需在50分鐘的時間內(nèi)完成。

第一部分是綜合寫作，以閱讀和聽力材料為基礎的寫作試題，寫作時間為20分鐘。考生首先需要閱讀一篇學術篇章，閱讀的時間是3分鐘。然后文章隱去，考生需要聽一段大約為2分鐘左右的與閱讀主題相關的演講。之后考生需要針對閱讀和演講中的觀點作文，總結(jié)并說明演講的內(nèi)容與閱讀中觀點的關系，在20分鐘的時間內(nèi)完成一篇150~225字的文章。

第二部分是獨立寫作，需要考生根據(jù)自己的知識和經(jīng)驗陳述、解釋并支持對待某一問題的某個看法，考查綜合語言技能的作文題目的評分以回答的質(zhì)量、完整性和準確性為依據(jù)。在30分鐘內(nèi)完成一篇300字以上的文章。>>點擊查看詳情

二.托福寫作評分過程

托福寫作評分包括機器評分以及人工評分兩部分。

機器評分主要通過E-rater，對考生文章的語法是否正確、用詞是否得當、以及單詞拼寫及大小寫是否準確等方面進行評分;一篇考生的文章會經(jīng)過兩臺機器評分。

人工評分通過ETS閱卷人評分，綜合寫作和獨立寫作分別有兩位閱卷人給出分數(shù)。

托福寫作原始分數(shù)為0-5分，考生得分分為三個level(如下圖所示)：GOOD(4.0-5.0)，F(xiàn)AIR(2.5-3.5)，LIMITED(1.0-2.0)，最終成績通過兩個科目的分數(shù)取平均分，再換算為30分制的分數(shù)。>>點擊查看詳情

托福寫作怎么從5分換算成30分(托福寫作分數(shù)換算方法)

三.托福寫作分數(shù)換算標準

具體的換算標準如下：

5分換算為30分，

4.75換算為29分，

4.5分換算為28分，

4.25分換算為27分，

4分換算為25分，

3.75分換算為24分，

3.50換算為22分，

3.25分換算為21分，

3分換算為20分，

2.75分換算為18分，

2.50分換算為17分，

2.25分換算為15分，

2分換算為14分，

1.75分換算為12分，

1.5分換算為11分，

1.25分換算為10分，

1分換算為8分。

四.托福寫作評分標準

托福寫作5分作文：文章切題，闡說充分，文章有說服力;段落組織有序，銜接緊密，過渡自然，有很強的邏輯性;段落內(nèi)句與句連接順暢，句式使用恰當，靈活，嫻熟;用詞確切，得體。文章中有個別語法拼寫錯誤，但不影響內(nèi)容表達。

托福寫作4分作文：文章切題，闡說基本充分，在某些細節(jié)上有缺陷。段落層次組織有序，銜接緊密，過渡自然，邏輯性強;句間連接順暢，句式使用恰當，靈活;用詞基本得體。文章中有少量用詞不當和語法拼寫錯誤。

托福寫作3分作文：文章切題，闡說尚可，展開不夠。段落層次組織有序，銜接緊密，過渡自然，有邏輯性;句間連接基本順暢;有部分句法錯誤;用詞一般，有時不得體。詞性區(qū)分和拼寫等有若干錯誤。

托福寫作2分作文：文章切題，段落組織基本合理，有邏輯性，但只存在于語義層次上，語言表達上未能體現(xiàn);句子框架結(jié)構(gòu)基本成立，但有許多語法錯誤，句間聯(lián)系不順暢，往往是不善于使用邏輯連詞，顯得幼稚，生硬。詞匯方面拼寫錯誤多，常有用詞不得體現(xiàn)象。

托福寫作1分作文：文章切題。闡說沒有展開，只限于三言兩語地回答問題;沒有段落組織，很亂，長度很短，只有一段;句子排列有一定的邏輯關系，能看出各句基本框架，但結(jié)構(gòu)或語法錯誤較多;用詞不得體，拼寫錯誤多。

托福寫作0分作文：文章各方面都有嚴重錯誤，句子不像句子。總體印象是根本沒有寫作能力，英語水平太低，達不到一分標準，只能打最低分。

托?？荚囎魑莫毩懽鞣段模盒W生應多學科技嗎

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: primary schools should spend more time on teaching young students (5-11years old) technology (like computer) than teaching music and art.

托福寫作范文參考:

The question of “ what is the most important subject or skill the elementary schools should teach? ” has never failed to attract attention from educators, school administrators and even politicians especially when it comes to subjects like technology, or music and art. Some argue that school should spend more time teaching technology than music and art. Personally, I am not in favor of this position based on the following reasons.

Admittedly, with the advent of internet and state-of-art gadgets like laptop, tablets, being able to use computers skillfully is being considered as a valuable quality. However, early exposure to computers and other kinds of technological products might bring lots of risks and problems to kids’ future development. Recently research by National Society of Psychiatrists shows that exposure to computers at an early age leads to addiction to computers when they grow older and obviously spending too much time in front of the computer can pose a threat to kids’ health, to be more specific, it leads to neck problems, nearsightedness, backache and even childhood obesity. Moreover, instead of getting addicted to playing on-line games and watching meaningless videos, kids should have spent more time focusing on their academic study, or even learning how to appreciate artwork or music. Indeed, spending more time learning art and music not only benefits the kids, but also it is conducive the community as whole.

First off, learning art and music at an early age helps to develop creativity and make the kids more imaginative. Actually, lots of scientific research in the psychological field shows that early exposure to art and music not only boosts academic achievement but also promotes creativity, self-confidence and school pride; kids who spend more time in learning art and music end up having higher analytical thinking and reasoning skills than kids who don’t.

Additionally, spending more time teaching kids music and art can can benefit the whole community. Music and art are a very important part of people’s lives. They are necessary for people to express their emotions, like happiness, sorrow, and even anger regardless of cultural background, ethnicity, age and even gentle. It is very urgent to spend more time teaching kids knowledge about art and music since they bring change, facilitate innovation and help to unite the community. They are the reminder of the past and maker of tomorrow, they also help to convey ideas and different perspectives. More importantly, art and music have great cultural significance, by learning art and music kids will have a strong sense of cultural identity and sense of belonging to community, eventually the traditional values and culture can be passed down to the younger generation.

To conclude, it is more advisable to spend more time teaching kids art and music than technology since not only can art and music benefit the individual kid but also it benefits the community as a whole.

托?？荚囎魑莫毩懽鞣段模赫疄槊癖娒赓M提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務

(A/D) The government should offer internet access to all of citizens at no cost.

點睛

題目大意：政府應該為民眾免費提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務。此題較為簡單，思路也有很多。建議選擇不同意，即認為政府不應該為民眾免費提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務，因為一方面會加重政府的財政負擔，另一方面會讓更多人上網(wǎng)成癮，進一步疏遠人際關系。

寫作參考一:

With the advent of internet, people in growing numbers are getting addicted to logging onto the internet out of various purposes, which has aroused deeply social concern. Therefore, the issue of whether the bills of using the Internet should be paid by the government or the users themselves has been open to debate. In my opinion, it is more reasonable to require the individuals to cover the fee of internet usage, with the reasons as follows.

To begin with, the users of the internets are supposed to pay the bills in order to relieve the financial burden of government. With the popularization of the internet, the number of people going online every day has increased to a lot, which means that the money spent on the internet is tremendous. Such a large sum of money can do nothing but occupy a great propotion of the governmental expenditure, thus cutting down on the investment of government on other more pressing fields like improving the public transportation and eradicating the poverty. By contrast, if the fee of internet usage comes from the wallet of the individual, the situation will become totally different. To illustrate, the abundant financial resources of government saved by this practice can better facilitate the economic development and render the life of the mass more convenient and comfortable.

In addition, requiring the individuals to pay for the bill of internet access will help to establish better social relationship between people. As is common sense, with the wide application of electronic devices boosted by easy access to the internet, people especially younsters are indulged in the cyber or virtual world created by the social network and various Apps on the cell phone. Consequently, it is not uncommon to observe that when a group of white collars sit at a table in a restaurant waiting for their meals, they watch the screen of their smart phones instead of interacting with the guys near them, which greatly alienates the bond between them. In this case, the free use of internet will aggravate this situation to a large extent. However, if the fee of the internet usage is covered by the individuals instead of the government, many people will be reduce their time spent in surfing the internet in order to save money. As a result, the face-to-face communication will become more frequent and thus the closer and more intimate relationship between people will be set up.

Factoring the above listed reasons, it is safe to conclude that the government should not offer internet access to all of citizens at no cost, in order to relieve financial burden of the government and to build a better rapport between people.

寫作參考二:

With the advent of the information age, internet and advanced technological gadgets are becoming more and more accessible, actually they are now as important as basic necessities in life like water supply and electricity. When it comes to the question of whether government should provide free internet access to all citizens, personally I am in favor of this initiative based on the following reasons.

Admittedly, providing free internet access to the public in schools, shopping malls, tourist spots and even households might incur some financial burden to the city since the government has to invest in the infrastructure and networks and even dedicate staff members to maintain the operation, however, it is well worth the effort and financial resource to provide such service.

First off, internet now is an indispensable part of people’s lives, and we simply cannot live and work without it. Providing free internet service can make people’s lives more convenient and bring efficiency to working places. For example, college students can utilize internet to send emails to inquire professors about certain issues in the academics, use different kinds of online service to assist their study. Internet makes it possible for professors to involve multimedia in the their classrooms, making the class more interactive and engaging. Also, businessmen can capitalize on the internet and monitor various data like management cost, profit, asset and liability, ultimately they can avoid certain financial loss and make more profit. Generally, internet makes lives more convenient, citizens can use location based apps to find restaurants, museums, sports centers, etc. Apart from that, internet brings a more connected community and facilitates interaction between citizens and businesses. More importantly, a city with free internet access in public places will see its popularity boosted and attract people to move in or visit.

Additionally, providing free wifi access to everyone is a very conducive tool for empowerment and social engagement, shortening the gap between the rich and the poor, the underprivileged and the privileged. Actually, internet access, cell phone contracts, and data plan can be very expensive and not very affordable to people with lower incomes. Providing free internet service to these people gives them life changing opportunities, like job hunting, on-line course, and even health advice. Consequently, providing free internet service can be a great tool for empowerment and social involvement.

To conclude, providing free internet service to citizens has lots of benefits since internet makes people’s lives more convenient and brings efficiency to working places, more importantly, providing free internet service can be a great tool for empowerment and social involvement.