GRE寫作中，ISSUE作為論證觀點的立論文，對舉例素材的需求量是很大的?？忌鸀榱藨獙赡艹霈F(xiàn)的各種題目，常會提前準備許多案例素材以備考試之用。今天小編給大家?guī)砹薌RE寫作論述舉例如何更有說服力 ,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學習吧。

GRE寫作論述舉例如何更有說服力

GRE寫作例子要好寫好記

關(guān)于GRE寫作例子的選擇和準備，首先大家要注意的是例子必須好寫好記。這一點其實很好理解，GRE考試官方公布的作文題庫總計400多道題目，考生為了應對可能出現(xiàn)的題目勢必要記住足夠數(shù)量的例子素材。而如果例子素材本身比較復雜，包含了一些很難記住的人名等特殊詞匯，那么對于考生來說記憶壓力都會變得很大。因此，GRE寫作例子素材選擇的第一個要求就是本身必須好寫好記。很多同學在準備素材時忽略了這個問題，導致沒能很好地記住案例，寫出來的時候出現(xiàn)各種細節(jié)錯誤，這對于作文得分顯然是很不利的。

GRE寫作例子不能一味追求高大上

這個問題其實在考生當中也普遍存在，幾乎可以說是“通病”了。一說到藝術(shù)就是梵高莫扎特，一提起法律問題總是會舉例辛普森案。這些例子看似名氣響知名度高，其實但從論證效果角度來看，并不比大家給出的其它沒那么“高大上”的例子更好。比如法律問題，如今的網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全、環(huán)境保護、食品問題等等相關(guān)的例子都完全可以拿出來用，而藝術(shù)類可以具體用的例子就更多了。大家完全沒有必要只追求那些著名事例。另外，但凡是這些著名案例，可以想見使用它們的GRE考生會有多少，而這些被過度使用的例子想必也不會太受考官們的待見。與其隨大流使用它們，還不如用一些同樣有足夠說服力還能讓考官們眼前一亮的事例，也許反而會得到更高的評價。

GRE寫作例子切忌胡編亂造

關(guān)于準備GRE素材案例，考生還比較容易犯的一個錯誤就是胡編亂造?？赡芤郧按蠹覍懼形淖h論文時有時候會自己編造一些所謂的“名人名言”，比如某某曾說過這樣的例子。但在GRE寫作中，這種自己編造例子的做法還請盡量避免為好。雖然考官在看到陌生的例子時不一定真的回去查證，但編造例子的做法其實還是屬于學術(shù)造假的，一旦被發(fā)現(xiàn)問題后果可能會很嚴重。所以小編建議大家不要嘗試這種做法。

避免使用學術(shù)性專業(yè)性強的例子

最后這一點大家可能很少會意識到，那就是GRE寫作終究還是立論文，是寫給大眾看，用來說服大多數(shù)人的。這一點從GRE作文題目本身也可以看出，其中并沒有非常學術(shù)性專業(yè)性的資料。因此，考生在使用論證素材時，也應該學會少用學術(shù)性專業(yè)性強的例子。換句話說，只有具有典型性和普遍性的例子，才會更具有說服力。為了證明一個簡單的觀點，使用一些非常學術(shù)大部分人都不了解的例子，這種做法對于提升論述說服力只會適得其反。

綜上所述，GRE寫作ISSUE中如何選擇和準備合適的例子，這其中還有很多要點需要大家學習。本文中給出的這些勘誤建議，希望大家能夠參考學習，為GRE寫作提分做好更全面的準備。

GRE寫作高分范文：現(xiàn)代攝像機和印刷術(shù)

GRE寫作題目：

“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”

攝像機可以通過如此精確而有力的記錄手段來再現(xiàn)當代生活，因此它已經(jīng)代替書面記錄成為了一種更重要的記錄手段。

GRE寫作范文：

“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”There have been many methods of documenting in the history of human， from carved ancient pottery to sheepskin documents， of which the video camera may be the newest form with certain superiorities and inferiorities to written records. The advantages of video camera certainly make it an important form of documentation， but not to the extent of being more essential than written records due to its disadvantages.

To begin with， video can be interpreted as a series of pictures associated along the time， while written records can be considered as the descriptions of these pictures.Therefore， it is undoubtedly that video contains much more information than that of written records. From a video， we can clearly know what happened with subtle details.Merely with a television set， we can easily watch the happenings at home， such as the Olympic Games， comfortably sitting on the sofa， needless to be present on the spot.

And more excitedly， certain close-up enables us to scrutinize our favorable athletes. If there isn‘t video camera， we may be unable to enjoy such activities unless we can afford time and expense to be on the spot. While it is true that we can also be acquainted with the circumstances through newspaper or other media， however， the written record may be unable to present them as accurate as video. The imagination from the reports， however detailed， dooms to be imaginary， by all means different from the real circumstance， which video can represent. Moreover， the written records may contain some mistakes due to the carelessness or injustice of its reporters， while the video may be more accurate and convincing.

Another strongpoint of video is that it can be perceived simply by visual signals， from which people mainly get information in their daily lives， and therefore this method is more natural than written records. Everyone， ranging from a babbling child to an old grandpa， is able to get some information from the video just as they do during their daily lives， regardless of their literate ability. While the written record， no matter how easily it is represented， requires literacy of its readers， and a newspaper or book means nothing to an illiterate person. In addition， video is much easier to comprehend for people all over the world. For instance， an American can grasp nothing about a story written in Chinese unless s/he has learnt such a foreign language. However， s/he can absolutely understand something about a video recorded in China， although s/he may be confused with the language spoken in the video.

While video is certainly not superior to written recorders in all aspects， its limitations determine that the written record will not be replaced at least at present. The first disadvantage of video is that it is much more inconvenient and expensive. Video must be recorded on the spot， namely， when an event happens to you， you cannot record it unless you have a camera at hand. However， even though you haven’t paper and pencil either， you are still able to recall it to record based on your remembrance.

Therefore， for those who can’t afford a handy camera or who are unwilling to bring it anytime anywhere， the written records may be the easiest form available. Further， another weakness of video is that its cost is too high and its correspondingly high-quality record may be beyond people‘s requirement. The cost of making a written report is much less than that of manipulating a video. Also， every morning we may browse a newspaper to know what happened throughout the world， and the simple report， which may only consume us a few seconds， meets our needs of curiosity; we needn’t the accuracy and vividness of video， which may be more time-consuming.

GRE寫作高分范文：思想家

GRE寫作題目：

Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when they claim to admire them.

大多數(shù)社會都沒把最偉大的思想家當回事，雖然有時候這些社會自稱是求才若渴的。

GRE寫作范文：

In this busy，packed and dull world，people's most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money，to support their family，to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are，not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly，in some cases，people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however，they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers' thoughts are. The fact is，in history of human civilizations，most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.

Generally，whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in，they have similar characteristics，such as high intelligence，eccentric temperament，wide range of knowledge，and the most essential one： the deeply and often predicted thoughts，which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand，it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand，it is also the thoughts，however correct and predicted，which cause these elites out of the mass' sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer，whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job，Nietzche lived an impoverished life， which along with loneliness defeated him at last： he became insane when 45，and died 10 years later. Until that time，almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today，many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.

In some worse cases，the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts，which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas，which are against the old ones，are accepted by mass，the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times，most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish，however，always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people's minds beforehand，are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus，who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time，it hadn't come out of press until the year before Copernicus' death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches，which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.