新GRE寫作高分速成技巧介紹。想要在GRE寫作考試中取得高分，不僅要具有很高的GRE寫作水平，還要掌握一些新GRE寫作高分速成的技巧，下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作短期備考提分方法技巧，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作短期備考提分方法技巧
寫作備考以鍛煉提綱思路為主
題海戰(zhàn)術有兩個問題：一是沒有解決根本問題，二是機會成本過高。所謂機會成本，就是你花的時間過多，而這些時間本來可以用來做更有意義的事情，比如說記單詞，學習語法或者看書開拓思路。設想你英文很差，但你寫作很努力，在考試時又碰上了寫過的題目，你的作文得了5分以上，但verbal只有300多分，人家一眼就能看出你的真實水平來。所以各位考生在打基礎的同時，要把重點放在提綱也就是思路的準備上。
好文章要有自身特點不能千篇一律
一個好的主題，通常都是采用滴水映海洋，粒沙藏世界的手法。從一滴水里能看到大海的樣子，從一粒沙中能展現(xiàn)整個世界。但是，好主題通常就是這樣表達出來的。每位GRE作文考友專業(yè)背景、準備時間與英語基礎各不一樣，在作文中面臨的問題當然也不一樣：有些是語言和思想都很出色，有些是有思想但表達不出來，有些是英語好但思路打不開，一個作文小組只有幾個人或者十幾個人，就能夠看出這些差別來，用一種統(tǒng)一的方法來進行準備，未必對每個人都意味著高效率。
徹底了解自身寫法錯誤
寫作能力很強的同學，通常的一件事會把握怎樣寫，如何寫，哪些該祥，哪些該略，哪些該修飾，哪些該平白，駕馭文字的功夫很是了得。文采不是每個人天生就有的，它是一個逐步積累、逐步升華、逐步成熟的過程，需要去大量閱讀、長期積累、心靈感悟、凝練提取的再創(chuàng)造本領，這要在日常學習中逐步提高，很多GRE作文考友干勁十足，一天一篇argument，但如果基本問題不解決而沉溺于題海戰(zhàn)術中，往往是事倍功半。即使GRE作文考友幫助你修改得很好，但你并不能透徹了解自己語法或者思維方式錯誤的根源在哪里，那就只能寄希望于把每一篇改過的都背下來然后在考試時碰上。如果記得不牢或者根本沒碰上，問題就大了。
選擇性地練習實戰(zhàn)寫作
試想一下，如果你在考試時面對題目，最可能使你心慌的是什么?那可能就是這道題沒見過，不知從哪下手;如果你想過了，即使你沒寫過，你也不會太緊張。
GRE寫作滿分范文
"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??
In?today's?society,?there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists.?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field,?education,?and?the?work?place.??First,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field.?A?generalist?in?this?area?would?be?straight?foward?with?clients.?For?instance,?in?explaining?to?a?patient?they?had?cancer.?A?specialist?would?use?wording?that?you?would?believe?everything?is?fine.??
Second,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?education?field.?In?this?field?some?instructors?use?"big?words"?and?try?to?out?smart?themselves?with?there?own?thoughts?of?character.??Last,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?workplace.?In?the?workplace?the?bosses?should?be?open?with?personell.?For?instance,?instead?of?acting?like?they?know?everything?they?should?be?open?to?knew?thoughts?and?ideas.????
COMMENTARY
On?the?surface,?this?essay?appears?to?present?an?organized?discussion?of?the?issue.?In?actuality,?there?are?fundamental?deficiencies?in?analysis?and?development.??
The?essay?begins?with?a?tautology:?"...there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists."?Then,?in?the?three?short?paragraphs?that?follow,?the?writer?promises?to?discuss?"a?need?for?generalists"?in?a?specific?field,?but?none?of?these?discussions?materialize.??
The?rest?of?the?essay?only?confirms?the?sense?of?"fundamental?deficiency."?Rather?than?analyze?the?issue,?the?writer?unpersuasively?vilifies?specialists?as?people?who?use?their?power?to?deceive?and?mislead?others.??
Although?the?errors?(sentence?fragments,?incorrect?verb?tenses,?and?awkward?syntax)?are?persistent,?language?problems?alone?do?not?earn?this?essay?a?score?of?"1."?Rather,?this?response?fits?the?scoring?guide?criterion?of?showing?"little?evidence?of?the?ability?to?develop?or?organize?a?coherent?response?to?the?topic."?
GRE寫作滿分范文
"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educators'?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."??
In?today's?society,?there?is?too?much?emphasis?placed?on?students?desires?rather?than?their?needs.??The?students?of?today?should?have?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them,?rather?than?what?is?desired?by?them.??Students?are?searching?for?the?easy?way?out,?and?educators'?are?supplying?them?with?that.??Students?should?not?only?be?presented?with?mandatory?curriculum,?but?the?educators?should?strive?to?insure?that?each?individual?student?truly?gains?from?their?education,?rather?than?just?breezing?through?it.?
It?is?vital?to?the?continued?success?and?expansion?of?the?United?States,?that?the?young?people?be?challenged?in?their?curriculum?and?be?encouraged?to?succeed?in?all?that?they?do.??The?educators?should?determine?a?more?strenuous?curriculum,?and?enforce?it?at?an?earlier?age.??Thus,?the?young?people?of?today?will?expect?to?be?challenged,?rather?than?avoiding?it.??Students?have?the?easy?way?out,?and?they?are?not?truly?giving?all?that?they?can.??There?is?so?much?potential?that?is?just?waiting?to?flourish,?but?it?is?the?educators'?reponsibility?to?tap?into?that?potential.?
In?conclusion,?it?is?the?educators?responsibility?to?enforce?curriculum?and?than?raquesting?it.??Students?should?be?challenged?and?expect?curriculum?that?will?eventually?lead?them?to?a?path?of?success.?
COMMENTARY?
This?brief?essay?is?flawed?by?its?generalities,?repetition,?and?limited?development.??The?central?thesis?--?that?it?is?the?burden?of?educators?to?teach?what?they?believe?is?necessary?and?that?our?educational?system?should?not?allow?students?to?"breeze?through"?the?educational?system?--?is?not?adequately?supported.??The?middle?of?the?essay?merely?repeats?much?of?what?was?said?in?the?introduction.??The?writer?discusses?the?concepts?of?students'?potential?and?educators'?responsibilities?in?only?the?most?general?terms.?
The?two-sentence?conclusion?simply?repeats?earlier?discussion?and?does?not?sufficiently?tie?together?and?comment?upon?the?earlier?discussion.??To?earn?a?score?of?4,?this?essay?would?need?to?provide?specific?reasons?and?examples?that?more?adequately?develop?its?main?points.?
Also,?the?phrasing?is?often?vague?("giving?all?that?they?can"?and?"path?of?success"),?and?the?syntax?is?at?times?poorly?controlled?("young?people?of?today?will?expect?to?be?challenged,?rather?than?avoiding?it.")??Still,?the?problems?are?not?severe?or?frequent.??For?all?of?these?reasons,?this?essay?received?a?3.?
