GRE作文最重要的還是要把你的觀點完整地傳達給讀者。這是文之根本。今天小編就和大家分享GRE作文扣分點解析,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE作文扣分點解析 你要注意了

1。邏輯混亂。

2。過于主觀。

3。中式思維/表達。

4。過分注重用詞。

大體上來說，同學們的邏輯問題是最多的。邏輯問題有三種，通篇邏輯，段落之間，段落之中。

其實這可能和我們高中初中的英語教育有關系，大家都很喜歡一條一條擺原因。Firstly，secondly。。。然后后面至于這個ly后面是什么就不管了，一頓胡扯。也不管這段落與段落之間的銜接是否自然，反正都有什么ly給打頭陣。

事實上，中西方的思維總是存在差異，很多時候看管老師們都不懂考生在說什么。考官很困惑，這個例子和這個有關系嗎?為什么前面在說A，后面突然B了? 和結論什么關系?要記住一點，文章是一個整體，你的開篇結尾和中部內容都是應該有關聯(lián)的。也就是說，在開頭提到的，文中應該有展開，同時在結尾有總結。中文里不也要求行文流暢么，這至少得要求邏輯是通順的。

很多同學都很喜歡寫中立觀點“A不錯，但不夠好”，這雖然看起來很客觀，但實際上對邏輯的要求非常高，要怎樣去組織語言，組織相應的論據論點，非常考驗人。有同學想說A事件要瑕疵互見，但是寫著寫著就亂七八糟，東一塊西一塊，不知道在講點什么了。更有厲害的索性冗長的2000來詞，講了個空話。所以建議剛上手的同學，還是選擇一邊倒，站定腳跟不放松。即便是真的要寫中立觀點，實際上也都在A和B之間有所偏好。

此外，現(xiàn)在很多人會要求練writing的時候先寫提綱。于是同學們們就只寫一個觀點，然后后面的例子亂用，或者根本沒有弄清楚什么是例子。事實上，這種展開，可以是實例，也可以是虛擬的假設。實例中往往分自己的經驗和他人的經驗。那么怎樣的例子有說服力呢?一般來說是：名人名事(知名度大)> 眾人眾事(樣本大)>自己經歷(體會深)>他人經歷。假設往往不夠有說服力，因為很難涉及到每一個變量。但是假設在有的時候可以行得通，就是在很難說清楚步驟和因果關系的時候，用一個假設場景來推導會讓文章變得淺顯易懂。

所以建議，在剛開始上手寫toefl作文的時候，先不要給自己30分鐘的壓力，先列出提綱(10分鐘)，再用30分鐘去寫，看能寫多少。

記住你的舉例一定要死死扣住你的觀點，不要是和觀點打擦邊球的。比如我改過之前一個小朋友的文章，她的大觀點是電腦對學生來說是有益的，小觀點是，可以查到很多資料，然后例子是可以用google查到很多資料，很快捷。ok，乍一看這個沒有問題。但是實際上問題大了，用goole查到很多資料，是因為電腦還是internet?這很容易就偏題了，變成internet對學生來說是有益的。例子一定要從論點出發(fā)，再回到論點。不要將你的論點發(fā)散，后果很可能就是越寫越跑題。所以每次寫好一篇文章，都看看，論據里的keywords是不是和論點里的keywords一樣，論點里的keywords又是不是和題目里的keywords一樣。你的keywords可以比大題里的keywords更加narrow，但是千萬不要更加廣泛。

最后說的邏輯錯誤，是段落中邏輯比較容易錯的。一般是對接續(xù)詞的運用。如However，thus，therefore，他們決定了上下文之間的關系，但是很多讀起來就很奇怪，兩者完全不是轉折的關系，用了however，就會讓人覺得有些無厘頭?；蛘呔褪巧舷挛闹g完全沒有邏輯聯(lián)系，就是兩個單句湊在了一起。還是這句話，一篇文章和流水似的，不能斷。中間斷了那就不叫好文章了。即使前一句與有一句沒有接續(xù)詞，它們在邏輯上也是要能承接的。

以上就是中國學生GRE作文三大邏輯問題失分點介紹，各位考生可以對癥下藥，進行克服。其實邏輯上的錯誤很難克服，很多大牛的著作里也經常會被后人挖出邏輯錯誤。但是我們至少要克服這些一眼就能看出的邏輯錯誤，才能讓文章看起來更加舒適。

GRE作文范文：Success

GRE作文練習題目：Success

Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it.

成功，無論是學術上的還是職業(yè)上的，都涉及了適應新環(huán)境并最終改變新環(huán)境的能力。

GRE作文范文：

Many wonder the intrinsic impact of industrial revolution over the last century. Is it a blessing or a curse? Ever since the invention of steam engine, mass production enabled factories to make out products in a madly efficient manner, while machines also supplanted innumerous traditionally skilled artisan, forcing them out of work. Gone are the days when they boasted of their craftsmanship that they assumed to be able support their family all their life. Consumers became more aspiring to novel design instead of durability as goods were made to be discarded.

Hundreds years later, with the first installation of integrated circuit on the chip, another profound turnover took place. Now the computer pervades our life so much that one may find himself half illiterate in absence of input skill. This time, thousands of jobs were created in Silicon Valley, transforming some of the few into billionaire over one night. Nevertheless, the original inventor might not expect that the ensuing slow down and thus recession in IT sector would approach so soon in less than 10 years, which is obviously less than a presumable 15 years time normal for a periodical change.Positive or negative, one mark that characterizes the technological bombardment indicates a constant fact: changes exist ubiquitously and operating at an ever-increasing tempo; those who fail to catch up with the torrent of change would ineluctably engulfed by billows, floating no where and eventually dissolve as negligible bubbles.

Favors as well as opportunities goes to who adapt to the contemporary trend. Fully recognizing this axiom, long before the scientists announced accomplishment of sketches of human genes or earlier successful cloning of Doris, candidates preparing for university admission have smelt the sense. Today, in the U.S., biology and its branch disciplines become the first choice for top students of senior high, determining that this subject, foretold as the third wave in technology, could bring them brilliant future as “Bill Gates” dreamt the same in the previous wave.

In addition to academic realm, respect would be paid to people who though deprived of their past secure professions, choose not to be a loser in the whimsical society. Like the artisans who lost jobs, a vast number of skilled laborer in China’s city of Wengzhou have undergone darkness and depression in those old days. However, after years of endeavor and refinement, they prove their value again. By accurately posit the economic trend and market demand, they play an active role in almost all economic sectors, garments, catering and lodging, hi-tech industry, you name it.

While ability honed in surviving the fickleness of the world makes the path through success shorter, it is essential for the more ambitious to acquire the pith of reformist and lead the trend. In this way, it could help him distinguish from the mediocracy and platitude. This is absolutely not an easy task. Inborn insight and foresight are needed to tell uncommon out of the commonplace; extraordinary perseverance and encouragement is a must to face the coming challenges against his iconoclasm. Very few people crowned with triumph possess this quality, whether the Nobel Prize winner or those who makes coverage on the Times.

In sum, as shown in the course of history, success, whether academic or professional,involves an ability to surviving in a new environment and---, eventually, ---to change it.Now some elite persons have again forecast that another social change is impending.Are you ready for that?

GRE作文范文：獨立思考

What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open―but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about anything.

GRE作文范文參考：

What does most human beings want is not discovery and change but reassurance.Although discoveries and changes are the real impetuses of human civilization, most people prefer reassurance than innovations and changes in that in this world most people are conservative and the discoveries and changes would sometimes harm some ones' benefit, which based on the obsolete systems.

On the one hand, in fact, most people value what they have obtained much more than what would be gain through new ways. This conservative kind of thinking in some sense is very common indeed since trying new ways always means taking risks of losing the present benefit. Take many Chinese workers for example. In China now,during the transformation of economy system, many factories and companies are under the danger of bankruptcy due to their rigid ways of thinking. And the workers in these companies or factories do not have positive attitudes neither. They ignore, or we can say give up, the better chance such as leave the old companies and find a new one which would be more suitable or quite for a short time to study some new skills; but stay where they are to wait for reassurance from the companies or government. the reason for this kind of behaviors is that they are fear for losing the jobs, whish however have little points after all. Simply put, they think they can survive if they keep the salary, but maybe lose everything when taking risks. Actually, these people fail to see the wealth behind changes and discoveries. No pain, no gain. One reluctantly loses something, he/she would not gain more important and valuable.

On the other hand, discoveries and changes would bring new systems and value and moral standards, which would necessarily break the outdated ones. In this sense,discoveries and changes could harm some ones or some classes' benefit. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand the resistance against new things and the preference of reassurance to the obsolete system. The Industry Revolution is just a case in point.

The significant change had brought human beings into a new stage of both material and spirit; but during the revolution, many people hold the point of view that the change is very dangerous to human civilization. Such individuals included peasants,old noble men and some government officials. The fundamental reason for this situation was that such a profound and overall change shook the old social and economy system and thus those depended on such a system felt they were threatened.

For example, the peasants lost their lands and the old noble men lost their taxes from the peasants; even the government officials, were in the fear of losing their positions.Thereby, for the men who would still receive benefit from the obsolete system, they would prefer reassurance than changes and discoveries.

It is true that sometimes changes and discoveries would bring some damage to the present society; yet they would automatically build a new one full of vigor and creativity. So people should not be restrained with the conservative ideas and open their minds to see the future benefit they would gain from the new system built by changes and discoveries. Anyway, new things are always prior to the old ones.