托福寫(xiě)作如何保證文章結(jié)構(gòu)完整?來(lái)不及寫(xiě)結(jié)尾可以這么干。今天小編給大家?guī)?lái)了托福寫(xiě)作如何保證文章結(jié)構(gòu)完整,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來(lái)學(xué)習(xí)吧。
托福寫(xiě)作如何保證文章結(jié)構(gòu)完整?來(lái)不及寫(xiě)結(jié)尾可以這么干
合理運(yùn)用技巧調(diào)整行文順序
托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作滿分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中明確指出：“文章結(jié)構(gòu)合理，論證展開(kāi)充分，并具有一致性、統(tǒng)一性。”因此為確保文章結(jié)構(gòu)完整，考生可以熟練運(yùn)用一些小技巧，適當(dāng)調(diào)整行文順序。
一篇結(jié)構(gòu)完整的文章包括開(kāi)頭段、正文段和結(jié)尾段三個(gè)部分，其中開(kāi)頭、結(jié)尾各1段，正文段可以安排3或4段。而開(kāi)頭、結(jié)尾部分內(nèi)容相同，需要考生表明觀點(diǎn)、簡(jiǎn)述理由。大量實(shí)踐和考生反饋?zhàn)C明：文章結(jié)構(gòu)不完整，尤其是缺少結(jié)尾部分，是導(dǎo)致低分的一個(gè)重要原因。
結(jié)合機(jī)考特點(diǎn)來(lái)寫(xiě)文章
另一方面，托福iBT考試基于計(jì)算機(jī)輸入信息，這也就突破了使用傳統(tǒng)紙質(zhì)試卷答題的很多限制?？忌梢栽谟?jì)算機(jī)答題區(qū)域內(nèi)的任意位置輸入信息，既不影響美觀，也不受傳統(tǒng)紙質(zhì)試卷的空間限制。因此，建議考生可以先輸入開(kāi)頭段，再輸入結(jié)尾段，最后在中間插入正文段。這樣做有兩個(gè)好處：一是保證文章結(jié)構(gòu)完整，即使時(shí)間不夠用，也只有最后一個(gè)正文段論述不充足，結(jié)尾段卻完整的重述了觀點(diǎn)，不會(huì)對(duì)得分產(chǎn)生太多影響;二是開(kāi)頭、結(jié)尾內(nèi)容表述類似，同樣的觀點(diǎn)再說(shuō)一遍，有利于提升打字速度，節(jié)省思考時(shí)間。
論述可以詳略得當(dāng)揚(yáng)長(zhǎng)避短
考生要想在托福寫(xiě)作考試中有出色的發(fā)揮，必須要合理分配時(shí)間，文章敘述做到詳略得當(dāng)，建議各位考生在日常練習(xí)中多列提綱、尋找規(guī)律，同時(shí)明確自身弱點(diǎn)，對(duì)于一些經(jīng)常表達(dá)不充分，或是沒(méi)話可說(shuō)的理由，簡(jiǎn)略論述，不說(shuō)空話、套話，絕不浪費(fèi)寶貴的考試時(shí)間。
托?？荚囎魑莫?dú)立寫(xiě)作范文：想要高薪但是工作時(shí)間長(zhǎng)的工作嗎
Would you prefer a higher pay job with longer work time or an average pay job with normal work time.
寫(xiě)作參考一:
In the current society full of fierce competition, we can readily observe that landing an ideal job has become increasingly difficult, which forces us to a concession in the requirement of the job we want. When it comes to which is more appealing, a higher pay job with longer work time or an average pay job with normal work time, people varying in backgrounds and personalities may view the same issue from different angles. From my perspective, towards such a long-running tug-of-war, my choice will depends on what age I am.
On the one hand, during my twenties and thirties, my preference will be a higher pay job with longer work time. For one thing, as for young adults wrestling with various bills in daily life, the high salary will help them to relieve their financial pressure and thus meet their basic need of life. To be specific, the extremely high price of house in China has been beyond the affordable range of most people. In order to pay the rents or afford a house, young people needs desperately a large sum of money which can be earned in a decent job. For another, longer work time is not a big deal for the young, because they are so energetic and vigorous that a sound sleep can help them to restore their vitality. A good case in point is the experience my friend, Andy. As a broker in an Stock Exchange Company in Beijing, he has to deal with large quantities of data and keep close track of any events which may cause the fluctuation of stock price. Although the heavy pressure brought by his job often require him to work overtime and even around the clock, he never makes complaints because the exciting and adventurous experience from selling or buying stocks appeals him a lot.
On the other hand, n the other hand, when I am at the middle age or old age, an average pay job with normal work time will be much better. After accumulating fortunes in the early years of life, old-age people do not suffer from huge financial pressure so that low income will not affect their life greatly. As we know, the old have owned their own houses and are not interested in pursuing the latest electronic devices or fashionable clothes, thus decresing their living cost to a large extent. As a result, they can lead a relatively high-quality life without high wage. Also, older people are usually those who have got married or even have children, so spending more time accompanying their family members is of great significance. Undoubtedly, the job with normal work time can better satisfy the need of staying longer with their kids or spouse. During the stay, the emotional bond between them will become closer and more intimate.
寫(xiě)作參考二:
Judging from what has been discussed above, we can draw the conclusion that my preference for a job varies according to what age group I am at.
托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作范文
People tend to have to different expectations out of a job, like personal satisfaction, higher pay, respect, and social recognition. Some people prefer to work long hours to pursue a higher salary while others tend to hold on a average paying job with normal work hours. If I have to face these two choices, I tend to choose to take a job with normal pay but more free time based on the following reasons.
Admittedly, monetary reward is indeed one of primary motivation to pursue a career, one needs money to cover daily expenses like room and board, utility bills, buy medical insurance, without money it is impossible for someone to live a decent life. However, it is not monetary benefit that gives an individual great personal satisfactions. Research that is done by lots of well-established professor in psychiatry has shown that the freedom to allocate your time and your intimacy with friends and families guarantee great personal happiness and satisfactions.
First off, spending too much time and working overtime can add more pressure and stress to one personal life and jeopardize their health. Lots of jobs are sedentary, like secretaries, lawyers, clerks, which pose great threat to their physical healthy. They might get dizzy, backache, and lack of energy. Other professions are even more competitive and intense, like stock broker, financial analyst who have to stare at a computer screen for more than 10 hours a day. It is not surprising to hear someone who has worked for 14 hours a day and several days in a row and eventually suffer from cardiac sudden death. It is clear that working overtime pose great threat to employees' healthy, which leads to sloppy working habits and negative attitude. The most unwanted scenario is the lack of morale in a professional environment. On the other hand, working normal hours makes the individual employee happier in their personal life and more productive in the working place.
Additionally, working overtime means that the individual will have to sacrifice much of their spare time devoted to boring and repetitive work. There are more meaningful stuff to do than working day and night, for instance, by choosing working normal hours one can develop a new skill or hobby, like learning how to play piano, play golf with a friend. Besides, working normal hours makes it possible for individuals to spend some quality with their families and maintaining a harmonious bond with families can be very important. Not only does good to the individual's mental health, but also it will make one more productive in a professional setting.
In conclusion, it is more advisable to work average hours with normal pay than otherwise since more flexibility in working schedule means more quality time with families and friends, great personal satisfaction and productivity in working place and lower risk of physical and mental problems.
托福考試作文獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作范文：政府為民眾免費(fèi)提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)
點(diǎn)睛
題目大意：政府應(yīng)該為民眾免費(fèi)提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)。此題較為簡(jiǎn)單，思路也有很多。建議選擇不同意，即認(rèn)為政府不應(yīng)該為民眾免費(fèi)提供互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)，因?yàn)橐环矫鏁?huì)加重政府的財(cái)政負(fù)擔(dān)，另一方面會(huì)讓更多人上網(wǎng)成癮，進(jìn)一步疏遠(yuǎn)人際關(guān)系。
寫(xiě)作參考一:
With the advent of internet, people in growing numbers are getting addicted to logging onto the internet out of various purposes, which has aroused deeply social concern. Therefore, the issue of whether the bills of using the Internet should be paid by the government or the users themselves has been open to debate. In my opinion, it is more reasonable to require the individuals to cover the fee of internet usage, with the reasons as follows.
To begin with, the users of the internets are supposed to pay the bills in order to relieve the financial burden of government. With the popularization of the internet, the number of people going online every day has increased to a lot, which means that the money spent on the internet is tremendous. Such a large sum of money can do nothing but occupy a great propotion of the governmental expenditure, thus cutting down on the investment of government on other more pressing fields like improving the public transportation and eradicating the poverty. By contrast, if the fee of internet usage comes from the wallet of the individual, the situation will become totally different. To illustrate, the abundant financial resources of government saved by this practice can better facilitate the economic development and render the life of the mass more convenient and comfortable.
In addition, requiring the individuals to pay for the bill of internet access will help to establish better social relationship between people. As is common sense, with the wide application of electronic devices boosted by easy access to the internet, people especially younsters are indulged in the cyber or virtual world created by the social network and various Apps on the cell phone. Consequently, it is not uncommon to observe that when a group of white collars sit at a table in a restaurant waiting for their meals, they watch the screen of their smart phones instead of interacting with the guys near them, which greatly alienates the bond between them. In this case, the free use of internet will aggravate this situation to a large extent. However, if the fee of the internet usage is covered by the individuals instead of the government, many people will be reduce their time spent in surfing the internet in order to save money. As a result, the face-to-face communication will become more frequent and thus the closer and more intimate relationship between people will be set up.
Factoring the above listed reasons, it is safe to conclude that the government should not offer internet access to all of citizens at no cost, in order to relieve financial burden of the government and to build a better rapport between people.
寫(xiě)作參考二:
With the advent of the information age, internet and advanced technological gadgets are becoming more and more accessible, actually they are now as important as basic necessities in life like water supply and electricity. When it comes to the question of whether government should provide free internet access to all citizens, personally I am in favor of this initiative based on the following reasons.
Admittedly, providing free internet access to the public in schools, shopping malls, tourist spots and even households might incur some financial burden to the city since the government has to invest in the infrastructure and networks and even dedicate staff members to maintain the operation, however, it is well worth the effort and financial resource to provide such service.
First off, internet now is an indispensable part of people’s lives, and we simply cannot live and work without it. Providing free internet service can make people’s lives more convenient and bring efficiency to working places. For example, college students can utilize internet to send emails to inquire professors about certain issues in the academics, use different kinds of online service to assist their study. Internet makes it possible for professors to involve multimedia in the their classrooms, making the class more interactive and engaging. Also, businessmen can capitalize on the internet and monitor various data like management cost, profit, asset and liability, ultimately they can avoid certain financial loss and make more profit. Generally, internet makes lives more convenient, citizens can use location based apps to find restaurants, museums, sports centers, etc. Apart from that, internet brings a more connected community and facilitates interaction between citizens and businesses. More importantly, a city with free internet access in public places will see its popularity boosted and attract people to move in or visit.
Additionally, providing free wifi access to everyone is a very conducive tool for empowerment and social engagement, shortening the gap between the rich and the poor, the underprivileged and the privileged. Actually, internet access, cell phone contracts, and data plan can be very expensive and not very affordable to people with lower incomes. Providing free internet service to these people gives them life changing opportunities, like job hunting, on-line course, and even health advice. Consequently, providing free internet service can be a great tool for empowerment and social involvement.
To conclude, providing free internet service to citizens has lots of benefits since internet makes people’s lives more convenient and brings efficiency to working places, more importantly, providing free internet service can be a great tool for empowerment and social involvement.
