gre寫作考試的分?jǐn)?shù)并不是那么容易拿到，同學(xué)們一定要知道gre寫作考試首段如何寫，還要確立正確的gre寫作考試觀點，下面小編就和大家分享gre寫作考試首段該怎么寫好，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

gre寫作考試首段該怎么寫好?

1、gre寫作首段方式-觀點對立

觀點對立的方式就是指文章開頭首先引出人們對要討論的問題的不同看法，然后提出作者自己的gre寫作考試觀點，或者偏向的哪個看法。對立法的句型多用于有爭議性的主題。比如：當(dāng)問起世界上現(xiàn)在最大的問題是什么，許多人說是嚴(yán)重的能源危機(jī)。他們擔(dān)心人類不久會用完石油、發(fā)生食品短缺。但有些人則持樂觀的看法，他們把能源危機(jī)看成是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的自然結(jié)果，而且只有隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)和技術(shù)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展才能得以解決。使用觀點對立的開頭方式，是對寫作題目一個很好的闡釋，雖然題目的內(nèi)容都會有人支持，但是，考生卻能夠明確提出自己支持的觀點，說明考生一定有充分的理由去論證自己的觀點。

2、gre寫作首段方式-背景引入

在新gre寫作考試的很多話題之中，可能會涉及到一些社會問題或者是教育問題。在遇到類似的問題的時候，考生可以首先選擇站在大背景下來闡述這個話題，從而能夠用大背景來支持自己的后面的觀點，使得觀點一開始就比較有說服力。例如：父母如果沒有時間陪孩子，可以將孩子送到兒童保育中心或者是個人護(hù)理中心。一看這個題目就是一個社會類或者是家庭教育的問題，針對這個題目，考生可以首先講解一下現(xiàn)代社會壓力大，尤其是做了父母的人，身上的責(zé)任會更大，所以就會更加努力地工作或者尋找掙錢養(yǎng)家的途徑，因此陪伴孩子的機(jī)會少。從而引出如何安頓孩子的方法，提出自己的觀點。利用背景引入的方式，還能夠保證考生不偏離主題，能夠確保話題展開的準(zhǔn)確性。

3、gre寫作首段方式-提出問題

gre作文開頭運用提問的方式，可以讓你的開頭段與眾不同的gre寫作方法。提問法是以問題為導(dǎo)向，引起讀者興趣，引導(dǎo)你的讀者跟隨你的思路走進(jìn)你的思維世界。利用提問的方式，還能夠引發(fā)讀者的思考，從而讓讀者能夠?qū)@個問題產(chǎn)生共鳴。此外，提問的表達(dá)方式有時還能夠起到強(qiáng)調(diào)的作用，利用反問的方式，能夠幫助考生強(qiáng)調(diào)自己的觀點。例如：There has been undesirable trend in recent years towards the worship of money. A recent survey showed that X percent of respondents ranked getting rich as their top priority，compared to X percent only a few years ago. Why do people fail to realize that wealth does not necessarily bring happiness?從這個開頭段中可以看出，首先也是題目要討論的話題，但是最后一句用一個“反問”的方式，提出要討論的話題，還起到了強(qiáng)調(diào)的作用，能夠引起讀者共鳴，引發(fā)思考。

GRE寫作高分范文：生動剖析寫作

GRE寫作題目：

Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.

GRE寫作范文：

I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?

What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.

Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.

GRE寫作分析：

字?jǐn)?shù)：651

語言：平實的語句完全沒有網(wǎng)絡(luò)流行模板的痕跡，也是許多過了6級的考生通過練習(xí)可以達(dá)到的水平。

I must say that I reject this statement.

Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt.

Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

GRE寫作高分范文：避免偏激

題目：

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

人們總是在尋找相同點，即使是在非常不同的事物間也不例外，甚至有時候這樣做是無用乃至有害的。實際上，我們應(yīng)該具體問題具體分析;我們應(yīng)該盡量避免比較的傾向。

正文：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for

similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.