GRE寫作有幾種類型呢?今天小編給大家?guī)鞧RE寫作具體分類，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作：具體分類

1. 只分了大類，可操作性差。比如XDF的分類，總共就只有8個，但是光寫8篇作文又肯定是不夠的。這就需要我們每一類下面還要根據(jù)寫法和內(nèi)容而具體分成各種小類，以達(dá)到一個小分類只寫一篇的目的。筆者在手頭資料的基礎(chǔ)上，總結(jié)出涵蓋了ISSUE全部題庫的23個小類。在復(fù)習(xí)的時候，大家最少只要寫20-23篇作文就可以完成ISSUE作文題庫全覆蓋的復(fù)習(xí)任務(wù)了，既放心又省力。

2. 分類中的題目描述過于啰嗦，不便于一眼看出題目的聯(lián)系。市面上GRE的復(fù)習(xí)材料已經(jīng)這么多，在復(fù)習(xí)的時候我們應(yīng)該更多地做減法。比如作文這里，既然在網(wǎng)上就能很方便地找到翻譯好的題庫，又何苦在每個分類里把雙語題目都打進(jìn)去?但是只放題目，不放題號的話，又容易漏題出錯，更不利于復(fù)習(xí)。筆者的解決方案，是在大類上體現(xiàn)出這一類的共性，題號后面則用中文簡練地總結(jié)這一道題目的特性。

3. 分類不完整，或者題號有錯誤。這是最致命的錯誤。我最初在練習(xí)的時候，就隨便選了一個題庫，開始準(zhǔn)備提綱。結(jié)果準(zhǔn)備到一半，忽然發(fā)現(xiàn)分類題庫里有很重要的幾道高頻沒包括進(jìn)來，又有幾道題由于題號錯誤而分錯了類。一怒之下，筆者對著ETS官網(wǎng)上的作文題庫編號一道一道地把手里的作文題號和題目對清楚。這絕對是市面上最完整的ISSUE作文分類，沒有之一!

分類開始：

近期長期

A.一舉成名 OR 踏實(shí)努力?

年輕人 51、71

先做后想 61

政府 19

研究者 129

B.經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展 VS 環(huán)境/文化藝術(shù)

法律保護(hù)保護(hù)區(qū) 10、125、148

瀕危物種 31、63、67

歷史遺跡 119

教育

大學(xué)教育：

A. 應(yīng)該政府出錢 12、25

家長應(yīng)該在學(xué)校多花時間 81、95

B.多樣性

學(xué)生應(yīng)該出國留學(xué) 82、97、100、123

學(xué)生應(yīng)該多選副科 13、46、70、102、112、140

教師應(yīng)該出去工作V.S.只教學(xué) 73

教師薪水應(yīng)當(dāng)與學(xué)生成績掛鉤 30、83

編制課程：

政府應(yīng)當(dāng)統(tǒng)一課程 6、14、96、116

應(yīng)當(dāng)按學(xué)生興趣設(shè)置課程 40、47、90

應(yīng)當(dāng)注重知識還是想象力? 54

想象文學(xué)、105知識>經(jīng)驗(yàn)、106、126

特殊教育： 天才是否應(yīng)當(dāng)設(shè)置特殊課程 37

C.教育的目的

解放思維 17、68

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educators'?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."??

In?today's?society,?there?is?too?much?emphasis?placed?on?students?desires?rather?than?their?needs.??The?students?of?today?should?have?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them,?rather?than?what?is?desired?by?them.??Students?are?searching?for?the?easy?way?out,?and?educators'?are?supplying?them?with?that.??Students?should?not?only?be?presented?with?mandatory?curriculum,?but?the?educators?should?strive?to?insure?that?each?individual?student?truly?gains?from?their?education,?rather?than?just?breezing?through?it.?

It?is?vital?to?the?continued?success?and?expansion?of?the?United?States,?that?the?young?people?be?challenged?in?their?curriculum?and?be?encouraged?to?succeed?in?all?that?they?do.??The?educators?should?determine?a?more?strenuous?curriculum,?and?enforce?it?at?an?earlier?age.??Thus,?the?young?people?of?today?will?expect?to?be?challenged,?rather?than?avoiding?it.??Students?have?the?easy?way?out,?and?they?are?not?truly?giving?all?that?they?can.??There?is?so?much?potential?that?is?just?waiting?to?flourish,?but?it?is?the?educators'?reponsibility?to?tap?into?that?potential.?

In?conclusion,?it?is?the?educators?responsibility?to?enforce?curriculum?and?than?raquesting?it.??Students?should?be?challenged?and?expect?curriculum?that?will?eventually?lead?them?to?a?path?of?success.?

COMMENTARY?

This?brief?essay?is?flawed?by?its?generalities,?repetition,?and?limited?development.??The?central?thesis?--?that?it?is?the?burden?of?educators?to?teach?what?they?believe?is?necessary?and?that?our?educational?system?should?not?allow?students?to?"breeze?through"?the?educational?system?--?is?not?adequately?supported.??The?middle?of?the?essay?merely?repeats?much?of?what?was?said?in?the?introduction.??The?writer?discusses?the?concepts?of?students'?potential?and?educators'?responsibilities?in?only?the?most?general?terms.?

The?two-sentence?conclusion?simply?repeats?earlier?discussion?and?does?not?sufficiently?tie?together?and?comment?upon?the?earlier?discussion.??To?earn?a?score?of?4,?this?essay?would?need?to?provide?specific?reasons?and?examples?that?more?adequately?develop?its?main?points.?

Also,?the?phrasing?is?often?vague?("giving?all?that?they?can"?and?"path?of?success"),?and?the?syntax?is?at?times?poorly?controlled?("young?people?of?today?will?expect?to?be?challenged,?rather?than?avoiding?it.")??Still,?the?problems?are?not?severe?or?frequent.??For?all?of?these?reasons,?this?essay?received?a?3.?

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educators'?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."??

The?statement?above?conceals?intesting?connotations?far?above?curriculum?development.??Issues?of?classroom?control?and?development?of?scholarly?talents?are?at?stake,?not?simply?a?debate?over?which?books?are?acceptable?or?over?revisionist?histories.?

The?statement?itself?is?a?bit?misleading?in?that?in?my?experience,?student?control?over?curriculum?hardly?existed.??Each?year,?there?were?certain?course?offerings?made?available,?and?students?were?to?choose?from?those?offerings,?of?course?bearing?in?mind?requirements?for?graduation?set?forth?by?the?administration.??On?a?classroom?level,?the?immediate,?initial?material?may?have??been?somewhat?directed?by?the?students,?but?this?was?a?part?of?the?process?allowed?by?the?teacher/professor?in?order?to?gain?the?interest?and?attention?of?the?students.??However,?too?much?of?any?one?thing?becomes?problematic;?letting?students?set?the?curriculum,?as?with?letting?students?choose?and?design?their?own?major?in?college,?serves?ultimately?to?dilute?the?quality?of?the?educational?experience?unless?a?single?advisor?can?devote?significant?amounts?of?time?to?the?individual?student.??This?amount?of?time,?or?even??the?expense?to?the?student?of?this?individual?attention,?seem?to?indicate?that?resources?would?be?better?allocated?elsewhere.?

Of?course,?any?school?in?which?the?students?decide?"what?goes"?is?bound?to?have?problems?controlling?students.??Once?the?educators,?be?they?administrators?or?teachers,?are?under?the?control?of?students,?even?a?democratic?situation?would?be?like?holding?royalty?acountable?to?the?mob.?Presently,?students?hear?for?hours?that?they?should?not?forget?to?use?a?condom?in?the?heat?of?the?moment,?and?educators?think?the?message?gets?through,??while?half?the?kids?can't?even?remember?to?bring?a?pencil?to?class.???Students?go?to?school?not?to?simply?learn?the?Pythagorean?theorem,?but?to?learn?direction?and?receive?guidance.?This?cannot?occur?when?students?are??in?charge,?and?standards,?already?hard?to?find?in?America's?contemporary?public?schools,??will?become?unenforceable.??If?students?dictate?and?administrators?do,?students?will?never?learn?academic?responsibility,?and?if?they?can't?be?held?accountable?for?homework,?what?other?responsibilities?will?they?avoid?when?they?get?older?

But?in?another?sense,?teachers?and?students?do?exist?in?a?partnership?of?sorts.??Teachers?are?there?to?satisfy?the?needs?of?the?student,?and?the?student,?while?perhaps?not?being?the?most?experienced/?knowledgeable?person??on?what?his/her?needs?actually?are?(versus?wants),?at?least?should?be?afforded?some?say.???In?addition,?we?must?remember?what?the?purpose?of?education?is,?and?that?there?are?different?levels?of?education.?　??

In?high?school,?the?focus?is?not?so?much?on?learning?actual?material.??The?focus?is?on?developing?study?habits,?and?on?social?interaction.??The?best?secondary?schools?promote?an?environment?in?which?individual?creativity?and?pacing?can?be?developed,?where?students?are?taught?to?thinkon?their?own,?and?learn?to?debate?and?argue?in?a?scholarly?way,?through?writing?and?other?formal?methods?of?discourse.??Group?collaboration?and?interpersonal?skills?are?developed?and?honed.??The?actual?details?of?what?is?studied?and?tested?is?of?less?importance.??Whether?a?student?reads?Maya?Angelou,?or?Yeats,?or?Euripides?essentially?is?beside?the?point?as?long?as?a?student's?mind?is?cultivated,?not?just?their?ability?to?record?and?recite.??What?is?important?is?that?secondary?students?develop?and?grow?in?the?hands?of?the?professionals.?

The?secondary?educational?experience?is?designed?to?prepare?a?student?for?college.??It?is?in?college?where?the?individual?learns?to?examine?the?world?and?how?it?works,?and?the?individual's?place?in?it.?

As?for?duty,?it?is?the?educators'?duty?not?simply?to?determine?the?curriculum,?but?to?present?it?effectively.??They?cannot?half-heartedly?paint?it?on?the?blackboard,?they?must?enliven?it?and?actually?teach.??Hard?work?must?be?lauded,?while?freeloaders?are?punished.??These?are?the?duties?of?teachers,?and?the?duty?of?the?students?is?not?just?to?learn?or?study,?but?to?grow.?An?independent?mind?is?what?students?need,?and?that?mind?has?to?be?in?a?position?to?want?and?be?able?to?question?beyond?the?material?presented,?not?simply?to?question?its?legitimacy.?That?distinction,?though?subtle,?is?the?difference?between?letting?the?students?follow?a?self-destructive?course?of?premature?self-determination?on?the?one?hand?,?and?permitting?on?the?other?hand?the?fostering?of?great?talents?through?a?cooperative,?mentoring?relationship??

COMMENTARY?

This?is?an?insightful,?well-articulated?discussion?of?curricular?responsibility?and?the?larger?issue?of?academic?responsibility.??After?a?brief?introduction?examining?assumptions?implied?by?the?topic,?the?writer?skillfully?develops?the?position?that?letting?students?dictate?the?curriculum?could?dilute?the?educational?experience.??Allowing?students?to?determine?the?curriculum,?the?writer?claims,?will?deny?them?the?guidance?and?direction?they?need?to?learn?academic?responsibility.??

The?line?of?reasoning?is?strengthened?by?the?discussion?of?how?teachers?and?students?can?work?in?partnership?to?satisfy?the?needs?of?students.??The?argument?is?further?advanced?with?concrete?examples?from?high?school?courses?showing?how?teachers?provide?guidance?for?students?through?group?collaboration,?development?of?interpersonal?skills,?and?preparation?for?college.??The?examples?are?varied?(from?condom?use?to?reading?Angelou,?Yeats,?or?Euripedes)?and?used?effectively?to?further?support?the?writer's?position.?　??

In?the?conclusion,?the?writer?thoughtfully?discusses?how?educators?should?not?only?determine?the?curriculum?but?present?it?in?an?enlivened?and?appropriate?manner.??The?final?sentence,?contrasting?a?"self-destructive?course?of?premature?self-determination"?and?"a?cooperative,?mentoring?relationship,"?ties?the?essay?together.???

The?essay?is?clearly?organized,?although?the?writer?does?not?rely?on?conventional?phrases?(such?as?"first,"?"second,"?etc.)?to?signal?the?organizational?structure.??Instead,?the?organization?and?focus?progress?through?the?line?of?reasoning?that?moves?fluently?and?coherently?from?one?paragraph?to?the?next.?

Language?use?is?generally?precise?and?effective?(e.g.,?"holding?royalty?accountable?to?the?mob"),?and?sentence?structure?is?well?controlled?(e.g.,?"hard?work?must?be?lauded,?while?freeloaders?are?punished").??The?few?errors?are?minor,?the?kind?that?can?easily?be?made?--?and?forgiven?--?under?testing?conditions.?

This?outstanding?response?received?a?score?of?6.