GRE寫作怎樣進行詞匯積累?今天小編給大家?guī)鞧RE寫作：詞匯積累，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作：詞匯積累

1.經(jīng)常brainstorm可以表達一個特定意思的單詞，找盡可能多的單詞。

并且制作一個自己的list，上面是以中文意思為索引的同義英文單詞，并且反復(fù)通過中文意思去回想可能用于表達該意思的英文詞。

2.進行meaning negotiation practice

如果你還沒有掌握一個單詞，你可以進行meaning negotiation practice。在學(xué)習(xí)一個單詞的時候，找很多這個單詞的例句，通過例句不斷猜測單詞的意思，直到你找到了一個可以在所有的例句中都解釋的通的意思，然后再去看答案。這種方式會促使你更加注意一個詞匯的context和collocation，更加有助于你對于一個單詞的language network的形成。

3. 單詞進行例句背誦，例句仿寫

對于已經(jīng)學(xué)會的單詞，如果你想去回爐把它訓(xùn)練成一個你在寫作中可以很容易使用的詞匯，你可對這個單詞進行例句背誦，例句仿寫等學(xué)習(xí)方式。

4. 最后，多讀多寫

想掌握好寫作的用詞，你要多讀多寫。特別是在寫作中，刻意的去模仿別人使用高級詞匯的例子，最后形成自己的寫作風格。

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?

automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

The?argument?above?presents?a?sound?case?for?arguing?that?if?the?region?of?Forestville?wants?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?consider?reducing?the?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase?in?speed?limit?took?place?6?months?previously.?However,?there?are?some?intermediate?steps?that?one?could?take?before?jumping?to?the?conclusion?that?reducing?the?speed?limit?is?the?only?way?in?which?traffic?accidents?can?be?reduced.??

First?of?all,?I?would?examine?the?actual?number?of?traffic?accidents?that?occurred?before?and?after?the?speed?limit?increase?and?compare?this?to?the?size?of?the?region?and?its?driving?population.?For?example,?if?the?Forestville?region's?driving?population?is?1?million?people,?and?the?traffic?accidents?for?a?6-month?period?before?the?speed?increase?totaled?100,?then?the?15%?increase?would?amount?to?an?additional?16?traffic?accidents,?or?116?total.?For?a?population?of?1?million,?there?may?be?other?solutions?to?this?increase?besides?reducing?the?speed?limit?to?what?it?was.?(The?comparison?to?the?region?of?Elmsford?would?only?be?helpful?if?the?regions?driving?demography?is?comparable?in?terms?of?size?and?scope.)?A?public?education?campaign?emphasizing?driver?safety?and?safe?driving?techniques?may?suffice?to?reduce?the?number?of?traffic?accidents.?Especially?considering?that?if?the?number?of?accidents?relative?to?the?population?is?somewhat?small,?it?is?a?fairly?safe?driving?population?anyway.??

In?addition,?I?would?consider?lengthening?the?time?of?the?study.?Six?months?may?be?a?relatively?short?period?of?time?for?which?to?study?the?rate?of?traffic?accidents.?Upon?a?closer?examination?of?when?the?accidents?occurred,?one?might?ascertain?that?most?of?the?driving?accidents?occurred?within?a?month?of?raising?the?speed?limit,?but?that?there?have?been?relatively?few?additional?accidents?since?that?first?phase-in?period.?Lengthening?the?study?to?a?one-year?period?would?help?adjust?for?any?untypical?statistics?and?paint?a?more?accurate?picture?of?the?long-term?affects?of?the?speed?limit?increase.??

I?would?also?examine?what?else?was?occurring?in?the?region?during?the?period?of?the?study.?For?example,?was?there?a?major?highway?construction?project?happening?during?this?time?which?would?have?added?to?the?unsafe?nature?of?raod?travel??Are?there?any?alternative?explanations?for?why?the?increase?in?traffic?accidents?could?have?occurred,?or?is?the?increase?in?speed?limit?the?sole?variable??Looking?at?the?type?of?accidents?that?occurred,?I?would?examine?whether?these?are?the?types?of?car?accidents?one?would?expect?from?traveling?at?a?faster?speed?to?corroborate?the?cause?and?effect?relationship.?Comments:?

As?in?the?sample?6?response,?this?writer?sees?some?logic?in?assuming?a?connection?between?the?higher?speed?limit?in?Forestville?and?the?increase?in?auto?accidents.??Unlike?the?sample?6?on?this?topic,?this?response?is?neither?as?exhaustive?in?its?analysis?nor?as?impressively?developed.??The?writer?makes?four?points?in?the?critique:??

--?A?statistical?analysis?might?suggest?that?the?15%?increase?in????accidents?is?not?as?significant?as?it?might?seem.?

--?A?car?safety?education?campaign?might?be?a?better?way?to?solve?the????problem.?

--?A?six?month?period?might?be?too?short?a?time?on?which?to?base?major ???conclusions.?

--?Other?factors?could?have?caused?the?increase?in?accidents.??

Although?each?of?these?points?is?developed?and?sensibly?supported,?the?critique?is?not?sufficiently?full?to?warrant?a?score?of?6.??The?essay?demonstrates?good?control?but?not?mastery?of?the?elements?of?writing:?it?contains?good?variety?in?syntax,?including?effective?use?of?rhetorical?questions.??The?occasional?flaws?(e.g.,?the?somewhat?garbled?syntax?in?paragraph?3:?".time?for?which?to?study?the?rate???")?do?not?detract?from?the?overall?strong?quality?of?the?critique.??For?all?of?these?reasons,?this?response?is?strong?but?not?outstanding,?and?thus?merits?a?score?of?5.

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

The?agrument?is?well-presented,?but?not?thoroughly?well-reasoned.??By?making?a?comparison?of?the?region?of?Forestville,?the?town?with?the?higher?speed?limit?and?therefore?automobile?accidents,?with?the?region?of?Elmsford,?an?area?of?a?lower?speed?limit?and?subsequently?fewer?accidents,?the?argument?for?reducing?Forestville's?speed?limits?in?order?to?decrease?accidents?seems?logical.??

However,?the?citizens?of?Forestville?are?failing?to?consider?other?possible?alternatives?to?the?increasing?car?accidents?after?the?raise?in?speed?limit.??Such?alternatives?may?include?the?fact?that?there?are?less?reliable?cars?traveling?the?roads?in?Forestville,?or?that?the?age?bracket?of?those?in?Elmsford?may?be?more?conducive?to?driving?safely.??It?is?possible?that?there?are?more?younger,?inexperienced,?or?more?elderly,?unsafe?drivers?in?Forestville?than?there?are?in?Elmsford.??In?addition,?the?citizens?have?failed?to?consider?the?geographical?and?physical?terrain?of?the?two?different?areas.??Perhaps?Forestville's?highway?is?in?an?area?of?more?dangerous?curves,?sharp?turns,?or?has?many?intersections?or?merging?points?where?accidents?are?more?likely?to?occur.??It?appears?reasonable,?therefore,?for?the?citizens?to?focus?on?these?trouble?spots?than?to?reduce?the?speed?in?the?entire?area.??Elmsford?may?be?an?area?of?easier?driving?conditions?where?accidents?are?less?likely?to?occur?regardless?of?the?speed?limit.??

A?six-month?period?is?not?a?particularly?long?time?frame?for?the?citizens?to?determine?that?speed?limit?has?influenced?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?the?area.??It?is?mentioned?in?the?argument?that?Elmsford?accidents?decreased?during?the?time?period.??This?may?have?been?a?time,?such?as?during?harsh weather?conditions,?when?less?people?were?driving?on?the?road?and?therefore?the?number?of?accidents?decreased.??However,?Forestville?citizens,?perhaps?coerced?by?employment?or?other?requirements,?were?unable?to?avoid?driving?on?the?roads.??Again,?the?demographics?of?the?population?are?important.??It?is?possible?that?Elmsford?citizens?do?not?have?to?travel?far?from?work?or?work?from?their?home,?or?do?not?work?at?all.??Are?there?more?people?in?Forestville?than?there?were?sic?months?ago???If?so,?there?may?be?an?increased?number?of?accidents?due?to?more?automobiles?on?the?road,?and?not?due?to?the?increased?speed?limits.??Also?in?reference?to?the?activities?of?the?population,?it?is?possible?that?Forestville?inhabitants?were?traveling?during?less?safe?times?of?the?day,?such?as?early?in?the?morning,?or?during?twilight.??Work?or?family?habits?may?have?encouraged?citizens?to?drive?during?this?time?when?Elmsford?residents?may?not?have?been?forced?to?do?so.??

Overall,?the?reasoning?behind?decreasing?Forestville's?speed?limit?back?to?its?original?seems?logical?as?presented?above?since?the?citizens?are?acting?in?their?own?best?interests?and?want?to?protect?their?safety.??However,?before?any?final?decisions?are?made?about?the?reduction?in?speed?limit,?the?citizens?and?officials?of?Forestville?should?evaluate?all?possible?alternatives?and?causes?for?the?increased?number?of?accidents?over?the?six-month?period?as?compared?to?Elmsford.?Comments:?

This?outstanding?response?begins?by?noting?that?the?argument?is?"well?presented."??It?then?proceeds?to?discuss?possible?alternative?explanations?for?the?increase?in?car?accidents?and?provides?an?impressively?full?analysis.??Alternatives?mentioned?are?that???

--?the?two?regions?might?have?drivers?of?different?ages?and?experience;?--?Forestville's?topography,?geography,?cars,?and/or?roads?might????contribute?to?accidents;?

--?six?months?might?be?an?insufficient?amount?of?time?for?determining????that?the?speed?limit?is?linked?to?the?accident?rate;?--?demographics?might?play?a?role?in?auto?accidents;?--?population?and?auto?density?should?be?considered;?and?

--?the?times?of?day?when?drivers?in?the?two?regions?travel?might?be?relevant.??

The?points?are?cogently?developed?and?are?linked?in?such?a?way?as?to?create?a?logically?organized?critique.??Transitions?together?with?interior?connections?create?a?smoothly?integrated?presentation.??For?the?most?part,?the?writer?uses?language?correctly?and?well?and?provides?excellent?variety?in?syntax.??The?minor?flaws?(e.g.,?using?"less"?instead?of?"fewer")?do?not?detract?from?the?overall?high?quality?of?the?critique.??This?is?an?impressive?6?paper.?