gre寫作如何評分今天小編給大家?guī)鞧RE寫作評分須知，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作：評分須知

(1) complexity:事物的兩面性(同一事物有優(yōu)點(diǎn)就有缺點(diǎn)，相比較的事物有各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn))，從多角度分析事物(分析不同領(lǐng)域中，不同情況下)。論點(diǎn)一邊倒的文章論述得再好也只能得5分。

(2) insightful position：在有全面深刻理解的基礎(chǔ)上，觀點(diǎn)最好新穎獨(dú)到(對ets來說)，但必須保證能自圓其說。

(3) conveys meaning skillfully:可用于論證的一切技巧(估計(jì)老美自己用起來也得費(fèi)點(diǎn)心思)。比如文章的行文方向，起承轉(zhuǎn)合不用明顯的標(biāo)志詞(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point)，而是依靠論述的內(nèi)在脈絡(luò)(只可意會不可言傳)自然而然的引到下一塊內(nèi)容。

(4) compelling reasons(reason就已經(jīng)夠令人頭疼的了，有加了個(gè)compelling)：這是最重要的一個(gè)得分點(diǎn)。

(5) persuasive examples：用來支持reason的，使抽象的reason更具體，更易被讀者理解，從而產(chǎn)生共鳴，或使其更可信，更有說服力?？捎玫睦佑凶约旱慕?jīng)歷，引言。

(6) well-focused:簡單說就是不跑題。中心論點(diǎn)明確，全文不跑題;各段主題句明確，圍繞主題句論述。

(7) well-organized：文章采用的論述結(jié)構(gòu)，分幾個(gè)部分論述，每部分有幾段，各部分、各段間的關(guān)系是什么。

(8) connecting ideas logically：using transitional phrases起承轉(zhuǎn)合詞，過渡句，或有此種作用的句子，總之起到help organize the ideas and move the argument forward。

(9) 跟著感覺走沒錯(cuò)。

(10) 不要羅嗦，表達(dá)簡潔。但如果以上幾點(diǎn)做得好，這缺點(diǎn)可以忽略不計(jì)。

(11) 基本上挺難，但不影響大局，為避免重復(fù)大膽的用你想用的詞，閱卷人能理解。

(12) sentence variety：最好長短句結(jié)合，ets藐視總用短句的人：Since most of the sentences are short and choppy, the ideas they try to communicate are also choppy.

(13) 還有語法錯(cuò)誤等等，小毛病，先把上面的問題解決好在理它吧。

其他問題：

.沒有十分地把握，不要亂下定義，嚴(yán)重的損害議論文嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)奈娘L(fēng)。

.ets討厭重復(fù)：不論是內(nèi)容上還是形式上，總結(jié)也要做到避免重復(fù)有層次，先表面后深刻，先分段后整體。

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

When?we?compare?two?things,?we?like?to?put?them?on?the?same?background.?same?condition.??

For?the?fact?given?above,?in?the?same?time,?foundmentally,?the?two?region?have?the?same?traffic?condition,?except,?the?speedlimit?is?improved?in?one,?and?the?other?keep?the?same.?So?we?can?get?the?result?that?the?reason?of?the?difference?is?that?the?improved?speed?limit.?And?also?the?change?will?give?some?other?inconvinent?to?the?people?there.?For?example,?the?people?will?not?familiar?with?the?change,?have?some?problem?in?handle?the?speed.??

So,?what?I?think?is?that?the?citizen?should?show?the?government?the?statistic?number?of?the?difference.?Argue?with?them.?Comments:?

This?response?is?fundamentally?deficient?as?a?critique?for?two?reasons:??

--?although?the?writer?has?relied?heavily?on?the?language?of?the?topic,????it?is?clear?that?the?writer?has?no?real?control?of?language,?and?--?there?is?little?or?no?evidence?of?the?writer's?ability?to?develop?an????organized?response.?

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region's?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.??Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.??But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region's?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.??

The?argument?gives?statistics?of?increases?in?automobile?accidents?since?the?speed?limit?increased?six?months?ago?on?the?highways?of?Forestville.??The?argument?also?gives?a?statement?of?how?the?neighboring?region?of?Forestville,?did?not?increase?or?decrease?the?speed?limit.??It?remained?unchanged?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.??The?argument?may?appeal?to?those?who?have?been?effected?by?the?increase?in?accidents,?but?it?does?not?give?an?emotional?appeal?overall.??We?are?relying?on?the?authors?statistics?but?we?don't?know?where?they?came?from?and?if?they?are?reliable.?The?argument?needs?more?examples?and?illustrations?to?get?his?point?across?to?more?people.??It?is?suggested?that?the?citizens?of?Forestville?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville's?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase,?but?it?is?usually?hard?to?start?a?campaign.?One?person?needs?to?take?action.??If?the?author?is?a?citizen?of?Forestville,?maybe?he?should?take?the?initiative.?Comments:?

This?seriously?flawed?critique?presents?only?one?idea?relevant?to?an?analysis?of?the?argument:?"The?argument?needs?more?examples?and?illustrations?to?get?his?point?across?to?more?people."??Everything?else?in?the?essay?is?either?summarizing?the?argument,?speculating,?or?offering?advice.??The?result?is?a?response?that?is?clearly?on?topic?but?that?provides?no?analysis?of?the?line?of?reasoning?in?the?argument.??

In?addition?to?the?lack?of?analysis,?the?writing?is?weak.??The?organization?is?loose,?although?not?illogical,?and?intended?meaning?is?sometimes?unclear?(e.g.,?"but?it?does?not?give?an?emotional?appeal?overall.").??For?these?reasons,?the?response?deserves?a?score?of?2?according?to?the?scoring?guide.