星期四的第三節(jié)課，我們班舉行了一場對于“開卷有益”和“開卷未必有益”展開了辯論。

In the third class on Thursday, our class held a debate on "opening is beneficial" and "opening is not necessarily beneficial".

從局勢上來講，我們正方的人數(shù)是反方的六倍，但誰輸誰贏就未必了。辯論會正式開始。雙方先表明了各自的觀點。正方主辯論手說：“我方認為“開卷有益”。高爾基曾經(jīng)說過：‘書籍是人類進步的階梯?！谶@個信息化的世界里，如果缺少了知識也就像餓肚子，多讀書可以修身養(yǎng)性，提高寫作水平。所以“開卷有益”。反方主辯手聽了，迫不及待的發(fā)言：“我方認為“開卷未必有益”。因為現(xiàn)在有些同學(xué)愛看武俠小說、武打小說、言情小說，都看入迷了，上課也看，走路也看，還模仿書中的情景。所以看書也要看好書，那些亂七八糟的書不能看?！闭降娜擞旨绷耍骸半m然亂七八糟的書沒有什么太大的好處，但你總可以學(xué)到一點字啊，詞啊，每一本書都有它的優(yōu)點，就算是武打小說也會知道一點歷史故事?！薄岸?，如果是看亂七八糟書的人，他肯定是一個心術(shù)不正的人，如果看書的人心態(tài)好的話就不會去看那些書，所以看書的人是抱著怎樣的心態(tài)去看書是很重要的?！闭接忠粋€人反駁道。反方不服，又辯解：“比如說我們班的蘇穎和林巧媛，看言情小說入迷了，排路隊也看?！蔽蚁耄涸懔?，正方被抓住把柄了。林巧媛和蘇穎可不服氣了，就因為這個，雙方辯論的更激烈了，你一言我一語，各各都像斗紅了眼的小公雞不分高低，相互搏斗。

In terms of the situation, we have six times as many people on the right side as on the other side, but whoever loses may not win. The debate officially began. The two sides first expressed their views. "We think it's beneficial to open the book," said the main debater. Gorky once said: "books are the ladder of human progress." In this information-based world, if you lack knowledge, you will feel hungry. Reading more books can cultivate your health and improve your writing level. So it's good to open a book. The opponent's main debater listened and couldn't wait to say: "we don't think it's beneficial to open the volume.". Because now some students like to read martial arts novels, martial arts novels and romance novels. They are fascinated by them. They also read them in class, walking and imitating the scenes in the books. Therefore, we should read good books as well. We can't read those messy books. " People in the right direction are worried again: "although there is no great advantage in a messy book, you can always learn a little bit of characters, words, and every book has its advantages. Even martial arts novels will know some historical stories." "What's more, if it's a person who reads a mess of books, he must be a person with a bad mind. If the person who reads a book has a good mind, he won't read those books, so it's very important for the person who reads a book to read a book with what kind of mind." Another person on the right side retorted. For example, Su Ying and Lin Qiaoyuan in our class are fascinated by romance novels, and they also read the platoon I think: No, the right side has been caught. Lin Qiaoyuan and Su Ying are not convinced. Because of this, the debate between the two sides is more intense. When you say a word and I say a word, they are all like little cockerels fighting with red eyes.

半小時后，辯論會結(jié)束了。老師引導(dǎo)我們開始總結(jié)：我們雙方都認為有一點是相同的，要讀書，就要讀好書。所以，此次辯論會正反雙方打成了平局！

Half an hour later, the debate was over. The teacher led us to conclude: we both agree that one thing is the same. To read, we need to read good books. Therefore, the positive and negative sides of this debate have reached a draw!

三組打一組，竟然打了個平局。正方的可不高興了，反方又驕傲了，下課時，正反兩方又開始了“辯論”?！鞍?！”

Three groups play one group, even a draw. The positive side is not happy, and the negative side is proud again. At the end of the class, the positive and the negative sides start to debate again. "Alas!"