古人云：開(kāi)卷有益。但是有人卻不認(rèn)同，為了這個(gè)話(huà)題，我們班舉行了一次辯論會(huì)，題目是“開(kāi)卷是否有益？”

The ancients said: it's good to open a book. But some people don't agree. For this topic, our class held a debate, the topic is "is it beneficial to open a book?"

老師把我們分為兩組，分別是正方和反方。首先是正方發(fā)言，正方代表說(shuō)：“開(kāi)卷有益的意思是讀書(shū)就有好處，是鼓勵(lì)讀書(shū)的話(huà)；劉開(kāi)渠先生說(shuō)過(guò)書(shū)報(bào)是人類(lèi)精神文明的結(jié)晶；又有人說(shuō)：‘書(shū)中自有黃金屋，書(shū)中自有顏如玉’。又有人說(shuō)：‘書(shū)籍是全世界的營(yíng)養(yǎng)品。理想是書(shū)籍的智慧?！晕覀冋J(rèn)為開(kāi)卷是有益的，多讀書(shū)，多看報(bào)對(duì)提高我們知識(shí)面是有幫助的。”這時(shí)，老師說(shuō)：“正方發(fā)言到此為止，到反方開(kāi)始發(fā)言。”反方代表說(shuō)：“開(kāi)卷未必有益。因?yàn)橛行?shū)是不健康的，有些書(shū)是不文明的，有些書(shū)是黃色的，會(huì)教壞人的。”老師點(diǎn)了點(diǎn)頭。反方代表繼續(xù)說(shuō)：“不是所有的書(shū)都適合我們小學(xué)生看的。所以我們認(rèn)為開(kāi)卷未必有益?！闭降拇眈R上反駁，反方的人不甘示弱；大家互相反駁。這時(shí)，老師叫大家安靜下來(lái)，分析正、反兩方所講的理由，老師說(shuō)：“正、反兩方都各有自己的理由。正所謂‘開(kāi)卷有益’是要選擇適合我們閱讀的書(shū)，而不是盲目地看書(shū)，只要多讀對(duì)我們有幫助的書(shū)，才能夠增加知識(shí)面，提高我們的閱讀能力，拓寬我們的視野，這才是真正的開(kāi)卷有益?！?/p>

The teacher divided us into two groups, the positive and the negative. First of all, Zhengfang made a speech. The representative of Zhengfang said: "opening a book is beneficial, which means that reading is beneficial and encourages reading; Mr. Liu Kaiqu said that books and newspapers are the crystallization of human spiritual civilization; another said:" there is a golden house in books, and there is a jade in books. ". Another said: 'books are the nutrition of the world. The ideal is the wisdom of books. " So we think it's beneficial to open a book. Reading more books and newspapers is helpful to improve our knowledge. " At this time, the teacher said: "the right side of the speech so far, until the other side began to speak." "Opening the volume is not necessarily beneficial," said the opposition representative. Because some books are unhealthy, some are uncivilized, some are yellow and will teach bad people. " The teacher nodded. "Not all the books are suitable for our primary school students," continued the opposition representative. So we don't think it's good to open a book. " The representatives of the right side retort at once, while the opponents are not willing to show weakness; they retort with each other. At this time, the teacher asked everyone to calm down and analyze the reasons of the two sides. The teacher said: "both sides have their own reasons. The so-called "open book is beneficial" is to choose books that are suitable for us to read, not to read blindly. As long as we read more books that are helpful to us, we can increase our knowledge, improve our reading ability and broaden our vision, which is the real open book is beneficial. "

通過(guò)這次的辯論會(huì)，使我們真正了解什么是開(kāi)卷有益。以后，我們要看對(duì)我們有益的書(shū)，更好地運(yùn)用書(shū)本的知識(shí)。

Through this debate, we can really understand what it is good to open a book. In the future, we should read books that are beneficial to us and make better use of book knowledge.

點(diǎn)評(píng)：通過(guò)一場(chǎng)辯論會(huì)不僅讓人了解何謂“開(kāi)卷有益”，也探討了什么“卷”才適合學(xué)生看，而運(yùn)用這種相互討論的方式更能讓人記住?！伴_(kāi)卷有益”是要選擇適合我們閱讀的書(shū)，而不是盲目地看書(shū)。這是辯論的結(jié)果，更是思考的結(jié)晶。

Comments: through a debate, we can not only understand what is "opening a book is good", but also explore what "paper" is suitable for students to read. And this way of mutual discussion can make people remember better. "Opening a book is beneficial" is to choose a book suitable for us to read, rather than blindly reading. This is the result of debate, but also the crystallization of thinking.