在雅思考試中，詞匯是非常重要的一部分。而且要想取得高分，雅思考試的詞匯量一定要過關(guān)。今天小編給大家?guī)砹搜潘伎荚囋~匯量如何擴(kuò)充,希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

雅思考試詞匯量如何擴(kuò)充

如何擴(kuò)充雅思考試詞匯量?

1)制定合理的計(jì)劃，反復(fù)循環(huán)

背單詞是備考雅思考試一個非常繁重的任務(wù)，它需要大量的精力。如果不制定一個周密的計(jì)劃，很多考生將很難堅(jiān)持。所以這一步是非常有必要的。一般來說，考前一定將單詞手冊背誦3遍，第一遍仔細(xì)學(xué)習(xí)，第二遍進(jìn)行鞏固，第三遍查漏補(bǔ)缺加深印象。這樣所起到的效果要比只背一遍好得多。

2)聽說讀寫齊頭并進(jìn)

很多考生記單詞的時候只是看，造成的結(jié)果往往是只記得外形，在閱讀里面能夠認(rèn)識，但是在聽力里面根本聽不出來，寫作里面也拼不出來，口語里面更不可能說出來。這樣的詞匯量對于英語學(xué)習(xí)來說，只是消極詞匯。而最佳的背誦單詞的方法應(yīng)該是先把單詞看一遍，同時聽一下標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的錄音，然后嘴里再不停地跟讀，最后把這個單詞憑著自己的發(fā)音記錄下來。只有像這樣多種感覺齊頭并進(jìn)，才能將單詞記憶得最深刻。

3)背誦與實(shí)踐同步

英語單詞歸根到底還是要放在語言中進(jìn)行使用的，如果只背單詞卻不把單詞放到語境中去理解，那么記單詞的效率就會大打折扣。因此考生在背誦單詞的時候一定要同時輔以大量的聽說讀寫練習(xí)，在反復(fù)的使用中鞏固單詞的讀音、意義和用法。劍橋雅思的真題就是進(jìn)行實(shí)踐的好材料。在做完聽力和閱讀的題目并進(jìn)行自己的分析之后，有時間的話最好將錄音進(jìn)行精聽，將閱讀文章進(jìn)行精讀，將學(xué)到的核心詞匯全部記在專用的筆記本上進(jìn)行反復(fù)背誦。寫作和口語練習(xí)的時候，可以多借鑒這些單詞。平時也要多聽BBC，VOA等英語原聲節(jié)目，多讀The Economist，National Geographic等原版雜志，多角度接觸，多方位記憶，鞏固所背的單詞，把消極詞匯轉(zhuǎn)變成極詞匯。

4)注意單詞之間的聯(lián)系

英語單詞量龐大，但是很多單詞卻有一定的內(nèi)部或外部聯(lián)系，比如，有些單詞有共同的詞根、詞綴，如：inhabit、inhabitant、habitat等。有些單詞可以在一個場景之下同時出現(xiàn)，如疾病的名稱：myopia、diabetes、hypertension、cardiovascular disease等。學(xué)科的名稱：psychology、anthropology、archaeology、sociology、ecology等。還有很多單詞和詞組存在同義或近義關(guān)系，如：cause、induce、breed、lead to、result in、contribute to、give rise to、be responsible for 等都能表示“導(dǎo)致”的意思。還有很多單詞存在一定的程度上的關(guān)系，如：smile 微笑、grin 露齒而笑、chuckle 咯咯地笑、laugh 大笑等。如能在背單詞的時候掌握上述規(guī)律，將原本孤立的單詞串聯(lián)成網(wǎng)狀，那么就能起到事半功倍的效果。

雅思大作文：the old age is more valued , while in some cultures the youth is more valued

雅思大作文題目：In some cultures, the old age is more valued (valuable), while in some cultures the youth is more valued (more useful). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

作文范文：

There have been drastic and constant changes of societies and values in the global context for recent decades. Therefore, some traditional cultures regard old age valuable for their civilization whereas other utilitarian ones may deem the youth, energetic and willing to accept challenges, to more precious.

What the senior brings about to all areas is mainly experience and the sense of security to all. It is well acknowledged that the aged, whichever field they have served, have accumulated more knowledge and skills out of years practice. They may thus grasp some principles that can be utilized in guiding the next generation to cope with matters and, even having undergone modern technological revolutions, ought to be applicablein most cases. Apart from this apparent benefit, another must not be neglected. Everyone without exception goes through the aging process and it is not hard to imagine what it would be like if a society viewed the elderly to be useless and exerted little of its resources in supporting them. Nothing could alleviate the anxiety of the middle-aged and even young adults about their retirement benefits and eventually fade away the sense of security, followed by some possible increase of crime rate.

Cultures think high of the youth, however, can see benefits on social production and renovations. In the first place, the youth are generally way more dynamic, which offer sufficient labor force to carry out productive activities, and if a greater reward and respect can be given and shown to them, this force can be more active and rewarding in return. Moreover, they generally and more quickly can embrace changes in work and life. This indicates the removal of obstacles in implementing challenging policies, promoting certain businesses, developing new technologies, and boosting economy afterwards within a relatively short period.

To my mind, a justifiable government should keep the balance between the pension for the past devotion of the elder and the incentive for the current contribution from the young, to realize social justice and security.

雅思大作文：the world of work is changing rapidly

雅思大作文題目：The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or same conditions of work for life. Discuss the possible causes for this rapid change and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

作文范文：

In my country, people used to be constrained to a single workplace for lifelong by social security or welfare system. However, this is no longer the case nowadays when people are free to choose their occupation or have to adapt themselves in different positions.

People now change their works and environment based on several reasons, subjectively and objectively. To pursue a better career or break through a bottleneck, rather than secure a stable income, young people usually opt to change their job. In addition, graduates with little working experience have not developed a clear perspective of their life career. It is reasonable for them to be exposed to various workplaces, orienting to the society and trying to find out their strengths and interests. On the negative side, employers have to qualify themselves every couple of years, or else they may get fired and are forced to get other positions. This is because modern technologies have been revolutionizing since the advent of computer and internet and employers from different industries have to adopt the radically changing needs of the market. They thus must recruit those with advanced skills and specialties and cast out those left behind in order to meet the demand.

For better future career and greater possibilities of being always employed, people can take the following pieces of advice. It is certainly feasible that people exert their lifelong time in acquiring new knowledge and skills. This is especially true and cruel for the veteran workers who may find their specialized knowledge outdated comparing to that brought by the fresh and even new graduates. It is only a matter of attitude of being studious and diligent, otherwise laziness would eventually take its toll. Another piece of suggestion is to stand on solid ground before a job-hop and a promotion, which is mainly aiming at those regarding themselves already fully-prepared to get higher position. If one’s strong sense of responsibility is not fostered, maturity not or ability to tackle problems not developed, the newly-promoted will suffer from both disobedience of reports and doubts of bosses.

To sum up, the swift shifting societies offer people less chance to stay vocationally unchanged. Therefore, the path of a successful career would be more even if one is willing to get ready and embrace.

雅思大作文：companies and private individuals should pay to clear up the pollution

雅思大作文題目：Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clear up the pollution they produced, the government should not pay for it, to what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

作文范文：

Government, the policy maker and the revenue distributor, has been dedicating to economic development while protecting the environment. If too many resources are allocated into environmental issues, not only will the economy be hold back but also businesses and individuals are excessively indulged. Therefore, they should pay for the waste produced , then processed and recycled.

Companies need to cope well with by-products from their factories. Although such request sounds against their profit-purchasing nature, they have to implement accordingly for their social sustainable development. It is easy to take a review of what happened: Early factories had been dumping stink effluent and belching smoke through pipes until the first urban centres were polluted. Their societies then suffered the decline of living standard, severe medical problems and even extensive deaths including those factory owners. Consequently, all industries should deal with the waste manufactured, or in other words, bear its cost compulsively rather than optionally for the sake of the whole society.

It is reasonable to charge ordinary people for producing pollution and waste when considering the two following scenarios. First, if citizens insist on prioritizing the private vehicles over public transport, more exhaust gas would be emitted per person and this definitely increase greenhouse effect. Also, when they enjoy the convenience of cheap one-off products such as chopsticks and throw them away with no hesitation, they are actually encouraging mass production of such commodity and wasting precious natural resources. Thus, a costly purchase of the car plate can hold back potential car owners and paying for recycling fees of the disposable encourages the times of these products used before disposal.

To summarize, I believe financial and penal approach feasible as it would be too late counting on the raise of general awareness and responsible of industries and the majority.