通過模仿高分范文的寫法來提升GRE寫作水平和得分是許多人都會(huì)使用的方法，但實(shí)際上卻有不少考生即使模仿甚至完整背熟了范文也無法有效提升寫作能力拿到理想成績(jī)。下面小編就和大家分享GRE寫作如何用高分范文來備考，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作如何用高分范文來備考?

考生在練習(xí)GRE作文如何通過高分范文來進(jìn)行練習(xí)呢?以下是幾個(gè)尤其值得關(guān)注的細(xì)節(jié)要點(diǎn)：

1. 尋找真正有價(jià)值的參考范文

現(xiàn)在市面上關(guān)于GRE寫作的復(fù)習(xí)資料不少，其中有許多都是打著高分范文的幌子作為賣點(diǎn)，但實(shí)際上這些文章要么根本不是根據(jù)GRE官方寫作題庫里的題目來寫的，要么文章本身的質(zhì)量就并不靠譜?？忌鷧⒖歼@些范文來練習(xí)也難有收獲。正確做法是首先要選對(duì)正確的寫作學(xué)習(xí)對(duì)象，參考一些諸如官方指南和權(quán)威教材里收錄的經(jīng)典范文來進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí)，如此才能有真正意義上的收獲和提升。

2. 范文注意看各類高分細(xì)節(jié)

看GRE范文，其實(shí)最忌諱的就是粗略看過點(diǎn)到即止，也許大家會(huì)留下這篇文章寫得不錯(cuò)的印象，但實(shí)際上真正有用的內(nèi)容和精華卻完全沒有學(xué)到。對(duì)待優(yōu)質(zhì)范文的正確態(tài)度和做法是要理解這篇文章，理解它的用詞、句子結(jié)構(gòu)、段落結(jié)構(gòu)。參考學(xué)習(xí)的目的是為了提高，因此考生首先要做的就是吃透文章，了解這篇文章究竟好在哪里高在何處。一篇文章之所以會(huì)被當(dāng)成范文得到高分評(píng)價(jià)，都必然有其獨(dú)到之處，寫作備中一定要注意吸取這些精華要素。

3. 選取長(zhǎng)度適中有中文解析的范文

用來參考學(xué)習(xí)的GRE范文最好能夠具備正確的中文翻譯和適當(dāng)?shù)奈恼麻L(zhǎng)度。GRE寫作雖然沒有長(zhǎng)度方面的要求和限制，但無論文章太長(zhǎng)或者太短都并非常態(tài)，可能給評(píng)分老師留下一些錯(cuò)誤印象。同時(shí)，部分文章可能在寫作中使用了比較深?yuàn)W晦澀的詞匯或者典故。因此，一篇適合學(xué)習(xí)的優(yōu)質(zhì)范文，最好還是要備中文翻譯和適當(dāng)長(zhǎng)度才能夠更好地幫助大家進(jìn)行聯(lián)系。

GRE作文范文：知識(shí)的影響

The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes.

GRE作文范文參考：

Ever since the appearance of convenient printing method and huge libraries, modern education became possible. Since then, the process of accumulation of knowledge was greatly accelerated, for mankind's knowledge storation can be developed in a systematic way. Education's function is to prepare our youth for the future by lending them the ability to discover mysteries of the world themselves or from books. The history of the human race gives us the impression that the major benefit we get from the academic training is the ability to perceive the world in different ways.

The most primitive form of education, which helped our ancestors, the cavemen, to survive in the harsh conditions during the pioneering period of human history, already possessed the power to change people's perspective. When a child learnt how to make a fire, he was brought to a brand new world, in which he was no longer the game of wild animals and the weakest creature facing the mightiness of nature. He could better understand and conquer the surroundings; the long winter, might have been one of the dangerous enemies in his eyes, seemed weaker since the fire he made could ensure him the victory. Once we have the ability to harness more power, we regard the nature in new ways; we used to have to adapt to the nature absolutely, however,today we could transform it to certain extends.

It is the coming of science and many other realms that truly and profoundly changed our view of the world. We can see further and deeper, thanks to the inventions of macroscope and microscope. But that is hardly the whole thing the science has presented in front of us. Science, widely taught in every secondary school around the world, not only allows us to see what we couldn't see before, but also allows us to get new information and knowledge from that we could see before. Only when a student finishes his course in basic physics, could he understand why some things are hot while others are cooler, and could he know what happens during the cooling down of a cup of hot water. What we observe does not change; nevertheless, the knowledge we learn from changes because of the new power science gives us. The study of science enables us to learn the truths behind the complex phenomena and to use the truths learnt to serve the mankind.

The study of diverse disciplines not only provides us with the ability to learn more, but also the intentions to think more and seek for the general principles. The study of philosophy, histories, classics, and other disciplines deepens our thoughts rather than broadening our scopes. Let's take philosophy for example, which inspires us to dig more deeply in our thoughts and hones our ability to form a correct judgment of our situations and our worlds. We may encounter the death of others, however, we won't understand the life and the death, were it not for the study of philosophy. We will also get more from the reading of all the good books, which is just like a conversation with the finest men of past centuries. We may not see more, but we inspect more; we may not hear more, but we listen to more. This best demonstrates the power of these disciplines and the value of studying them.

Human, the most intelligent, and rational beings on the Earth, stands in the dominant position of our world for thousands of years. We cannot make the wildest guess at what our world would like without the different realms of our thoughts and the education imparting these treasures to our descendants. Different fields of study give us different perspectives of this world, only when we properly and usefully assimilate the various discoveries in myriad disciplines, could we form a most brilliant picture of our today and of our tomorrow.

GRE寫作高分范文：北美GRE寫作滿分范文

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GRE首段

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

GRE中間段1

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

GRE中間段2

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

GRE中間段3

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

GRE末端

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

GRE這篇官方欽定滿分的范文，其最明顯的優(yōu)點(diǎn)在于：

1. 字?jǐn)?shù)高達(dá)599words, GRE充分體現(xiàn)了字?jǐn)?shù)為王的判分傾向。

2. 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的五段制，首段、GRE末端，中間三段，看上去很美。

3. 沒有陳詞濫調(diào)、GRE滿篇廢話的模板式語言。

只有以上三點(diǎn)離滿分還是很遠(yuǎn)的，GRE之所以SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各盡其責(zé)，既獨(dú)立又統(tǒng)一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:

1. 首段再現(xiàn)了原TOPIC的推理過程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不適;尤其令閱卷人高興的是：首段在最后簡(jiǎn)化羅列了推理中的三個(gè)問題。要知道美國(guó)人就喜歡的作文---總分式，在首段就把三個(gè)ideas羅列出來，然后在中間三段分別展開，先總后分，一目了然。

2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可謂是一針見血，一劍封喉。對(duì)于這樣嚴(yán)重的推理漏洞，如果不首先指出，其argument必然軟弱乏力。此所謂Topic中的 “必削點(diǎn)”，不可不察。

3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”這可謂是劍走偏鋒，獨(dú)辟蹊徑，出人所料。文章竟然批評(píng)了Topic以錢為本經(jīng)營(yíng)理念，提出了要以人為本，這樣寫是有一定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，畢竟這不是Issue。那本文是如何化險(xiǎn)為夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得長(zhǎng)舒一口，人家再次回歸了，又回到了Topic中以“Money”為本的推理。

4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”這充分體現(xiàn)了作者不只是坐而論道的arguer，而是關(guān)心其可行性的現(xiàn)實(shí)主義者，考慮到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

5. 末端不但對(duì)首段提出的論點(diǎn)做出了重復(fù)性的總結(jié)，GRE而且又不厭其煩地把中間三段的ideas一一羅列。如此“啰嗦”估計(jì)令某些同學(xué)略有不齒，但這恰恰是美國(guó)人的最愛，cultural shock了吧?

本文最令我欣賞的地方，GRE就是對(duì)EXAMPLES的運(yùn)用

1. 中間段一，運(yùn)用了“設(shè)例”GRE(假設(shè)的情況)，$100 million啦、$5,000了，很幼稚是吧?可美國(guó)人喜歡啊;咱中國(guó)的學(xué)生，尤其是理工科的，喜歡用一些相當(dāng)高深的例子，有沒有想過那些閱卷老師能看懂嗎?尤其是在極短時(shí)間內(nèi)，他們IQ又不高，知識(shí)又不多，聯(lián)想又不豐富……

2. 中間段二，運(yùn)用了“具例”GRE(具體的例子)，舉一個(gè)婦孺皆知的Toyota例子把想說明的問題統(tǒng)統(tǒng)道出，再次體現(xiàn)出美國(guó)人喜歡淺顯易懂的事例。

3. 中間段三，運(yùn)用了“泛例”GRE(某一類人、團(tuán)體或組織)，通過采煤行業(yè)指出了計(jì)劃可行性的所受到的制約，一個(gè)多么質(zhì)樸無華的泛例，充分地考慮到了閱卷老師的理解能力。

以上這一切怎能不讓美國(guó)閱卷者頻頻頷首，GRE嘖嘖稱善呢?他或她手中的筆在紙上劃出了一條美麗的弧線 —— 6

相反，有些中國(guó)學(xué)生，憑借自己繁密的邏輯、GRE淵深的例子和云霧繚繞的行文，每每令那些閱卷者咬唇咂舌，shrug連連，又怎能獲得一個(gè)理想的分?jǐn)?shù)呢?你挑戰(zhàn)了他的智商，他必然報(bào)復(fù)你的分?jǐn)?shù)。