托福寫作包括獨立寫作和綜合寫作，兩部分考試時間一共為50分鐘，那么托福寫作時間應(yīng)該如何分配才更加合理呢?小今天小編給大家?guī)砹送懈懽鲿r間如何分配,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學(xué)習(xí)吧。

托福時間分配：托福寫作時間如何分配?

一.托福寫作時間詳解

綜合寫作(20分鐘)

對于以閱讀和聽力材料為基礎(chǔ)的寫作試題，考生首先需要3分鐘閱讀一篇學(xué)術(shù)短文，并主要記下文章觀點和一些主要詞匯，為下面的聽力部分做準(zhǔn)備。然后文章隱去，這時考生需要聽一段大約為2分鐘的課堂講解。剛閱讀過的短文內(nèi)容有關(guān)，一般是對閱讀材料中觀點的反駁。

所以，考生就要針對每個觀點分別記下聽力中給出的反駁理由和例子。有時聽力的內(nèi)容是對閱讀材料觀點的補(bǔ)充說明，理由和例子也要相應(yīng)記下。接下來，考生有20分鐘的時間來總結(jié)聽力材料中的要點，并解釋這些要點與閱讀材料中的要求有何不同。通常有效的回答應(yīng)是一篇150-225個單詞的作文。每個寫作任務(wù)的分?jǐn)?shù)是0-5分?？疾榫C合語言技能的作文題目的評分以回答的質(zhì)量、完整性和準(zhǔn)確性為依據(jù)。

時間總長(20分鐘)

閱讀學(xué)術(shù)短文(1篇)，記錄觀點和詞匯3min

聽課堂講解(記錄反駁理由和例子) 2min

總結(jié)/解釋聽力材料要點20min

檢查/完善5min

獨立寫作(30分鐘)

獨立寫作試題部分需要考生根據(jù)自己的知識和經(jīng)驗陳述、解釋并支持對待某一問題的某個看法。通常有效的回答應(yīng)是一篇300個單詞左右的作文。

二.托福寫作時間分配方法

托福獨立寫作時間分配

第一步：3分鐘審題列提綱

要避免兩個極端：(只需要在草稿紙上用英文單詞或漢語列出各個理由，防止遺忘))用時太少，理由沒有想清楚就開始寫作，不僅造成文章邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)不清，還會引起行文中頻繁的修正，欲速則不達(dá);用時太多，不要追求一次思考就能把每一條理由及相關(guān)例證都想出來。其實想出兩條之后就可以動筆，各個理由的例證可以寫到該段時邊思考邊寫。這一點你不必懷疑，只要你的思維還是正常的，一定能做到。

第二步：20分鐘正文寫作

a.各段寫作時注意對段落的不同部分給予不同的重視。主題句給予最大重視，注意煉句，別說你不想寫主題句，主題句可以使讀者和筆者本人更清晰該段落寫什么。各段中支持性細(xì)節(jié)寫作不必遵循相同的模式。有n種選擇可供參考：1.舉具體事例2.說對方相對缺點3.使用數(shù)據(jù)4.使用假想例子5.使用類比、比喻、引用等修辭手段來論述。 哪一種你最容易想出來，就用哪一種。

b.考前將文章開頭、結(jié)尾、例證、讓步等各種句套背熟練，并且練習(xí)和模考時把他們用熟，要象做完型填空一樣對待考場作文。別試圖在考場上再現(xiàn)去決定比如哪種開頭好，怎樣結(jié)尾好。使用自己選種的套話。

c.當(dāng)被告知還有5分鐘結(jié)束時，一般你已經(jīng)該寫到最后一條理由，或者已經(jīng)在做結(jié)尾。要確保文章有結(jié)尾段。(不排除將他和最后一條理由的末段結(jié)合在一起的可能性。)

……

第三步：留出3分鐘檢查

1.時態(tài)：文章絕大部分使用的是一般現(xiàn)在時;一般現(xiàn)在時第三人稱要使用單數(shù);使用過去發(fā)生的事例時用的是過去時;

2.句法：確保每句話是完整的，有謂語，且簡單句只有一個謂語。

3.主謂一致按此三步，持續(xù)練習(xí)5篇以上，可以確保時間問題。

托福考試作文獨立寫作范文：教育孩子最好的方式

現(xiàn)在有一些學(xué)校require children(5-11歲) to work together instead of working on their own during most of their learning process， do you agree or disagree that is the best way to teach children?

托福寫作模板及參考答案：

托福寫作范文參考:

2016年10月16日托福獨立寫作范文

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Many schools require young children (aged 5-11) to work together in a small group instead of working alone to learn man activities.

Educators and researchers have never stopped the examination of the importance and relevance of collaborative learning that are encouraged by middle schools. When compared with studying alone, I, personally, believe that it is far more beneficial to students when working in groups for the following reasons.

First off, working in a group can be very conducive for students since they can help students to study more effectively and thus tackle real-world issues. A recent study conducted by University of Minnesota backed up the claim that study teams, collaborative learning and group projects are far more effective in helping students to develop useful skills than traditional teacher-led teaching approach. In fact, when learning in groups, students have to do some research about the topic they are expected to discuss beforehand, which helps them to clear up some misunderstandings and boast their enthusiasm in academic exploration. Clearly, working in a group can help students to retain information for a much longer time and have a much deeper understanding of some concepts and ideas. Consequently, if teachers categorize students and organize them in small study groups, chances are that they would solve complex issues together, like researching the history of the city, examining the water quality of the local town, so on and so forth. Students can develop critical thinking skills as well as learn to collect and analyze information from multiple sources.

Additionally, working in groups has much deeper implications beyond students’ academic experience. As the saying goes: “many hands make light work”. Actually it remains as relevant today as it did a century ago. To be more specific, working together helps to develop skills like cooperation, organization and leadership. When learning in a group, every single student gets a chance to contribute their knowledge to the group, and they can learn to appreciate the work of other students simultaneously as well. What’s more, they have to work closely with others for the same goal otherwise they might not be able to compete with other study groups. More importantly, students will get exposure to distinctive perspectives and at the same time learn how to accept different points of view and find common ground in this process. Such an educational experience will not only be helpful for their future study but also beneficial to them when they have to deal with coworkers, clients, and teammates in a professional setting in the future. Numerous studies have shown that students who have prior experience working with others enjoy a better chance to be successful in their future career.

In conclusion, working together in a group has far more meaningful implications than working alone since collaborative learning helps students to learn much more effectively and develop important skills that are vital for their future study and career.

托福考試作文獨立寫作范文：城市領(lǐng)導(dǎo)如何保障城市繁榮

As the leader of a city, what would you doto ensure the prosperity and success of the city?

A. creating job opportunities for theunemployed;

B. lowering food price;

C. providing affordable housing

題目大意：作為一個城市的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)想要保障城市的繁榮，要做以下三項：為失業(yè)人員提供就業(yè)機(jī)會，降低食物價格，提供經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房。波波建議選擇為失業(yè)人員提供工作，證明其重要性，然后另外一段將兩個選項的不必要性闡述明白。

范文參考一:

In a society changing amazingly, that how to gurantee the prosperity and success of a city， the common target of all citizens，has always been brought under the spotlight of the massive media. When talking about which factor plays the most crucial role in ensuring city's smooth development, among creating job vacancy, lowering food price or adjusting housing price, people’s notion varies from one to another. From my perspective, providing job opportunities for the unemployed is the best choice.

In the first instance, offering job vacancies to the laid-offs will not only guarantee the social security and safety but also strengthen the purchasing power of the public. For one thing, given the indisputable fact that the unemployed without any income are likely to commit crimes such as theft of wallets or burglaries due to lack of daily necessities, it is self-evident that the greater the number of laid-offs is, the more unstable our society will become. Therefore, after satisfying their basic needs of life with the income from the job offered by the government, they will no longer be a threat to the stability of the whole society, which is the solid foundation for social progress and prosperity. For another, as long as citizens with jobs have more free disposable money and thus possess stronger purchasing monitory power, the various industries will be stimulated and propelled to a large extent. To be specific, with the accruing wealth, an increasing number of people will purchase a private car to commute to their office, with the result that the whole industry of automobiles will experience a booming period. The same logic can also be true of other industries and fields.

Furthermore, there are obvious disadvantages of the other two policies, lowering the food price and making the price of house affordable. Despite the fact that keeping the food price low and providing affordable housing will lessen the financial burden of the dwellers in the city in a short term, these two practices would hinder the future success of the whole society. To illustrate, the low price of food will definitely decrease the income of food producers, especially the farmers who support their family by selling what they plant and raise. As a result, they are likely to have great difficulty in making their ends meet, thus ending up becoming homeless or jobless. Also, in a long run, increasing housing affordability will put a damper on the citizens’ passion for creating wealth and thus decrease the dynamics of the whole society. Specifically speaking, when the price is so cheap that nearly everyone can afford it with ease, no one will work hard any more.

In a nutshell, I am convinced that the most effective and efficient way to boom a city is to create more job opportunities for the jobless.

寫作參考二:

All governments on the planet engage in finding the best methods to develop their country into a more powerful nation with abundant resources. These methods are supposed to cover as many people as possible and with no doubt, be effective enough to bring about profits as soon as possible. Among all the approaches that are aiming at advancing a country, I firmly believe that the issues associated with food is more important and should be paid more attention to by countries.

First of all, under no circumstances can human live without food supply, which is the premise of all human activities. As a result, solving the problems in agriculture and the availability of food to all people is an essential factor in the development of a country. When people have rice to eat, they have more energy to work in the fields; when people are supplied with meat, they are more passionate in manufacturing crafts and tools; when people have cheaper fruits on the markets, they become more willing to serve his customers at work; when people have easier access to clothes, they are more inspired in doing researches and experiments. No progress can be made with hungry stomachs.

Second, it is easier to advance agriculture than to create more job positions for unemployed workers. Increasing agricultural production depend largely on good command of planting or farming knowledge and technology. For the knowledge aspect, information can be obtained through diverse channels like books, magazines and the internet, where information is not only authorized but also comprehensive. For the technology aspect, the governments can either invest in researches in crop properties or genetic modification or purchase equipment or technology from those few highly developed countries who fulfill the responsibility to help more other countries. Nonetheless, creating work opportunities is not that easy, since companies, either state owned or privately owned, have certain precise requirement for the number of workers according to the types of business they undertake and current situation of the market.

Finally, promoting the food industry benefit more people than affordable housing can do. As we have discussed above, food is needed by everybody and better agricultural conditions make a so great difference that it extends how far a government can go. In contrast, few people need houses, especially in this modernized society, as a direct consequence of building more housing apartments, most individuals already possess a house to live in, where means whether the houses are affordable or not has little or no influence on the overall development of the country.

To sum up, I believe what we eat means more than what we do and where we live. The leaders of all countries should focus more on the improvement of food availability and more and more people will live a happier life.