托福寫作詞匯與閱讀和聽力詞匯不同，寫作是輸出項，掌握的詞匯不僅要認識，還要會用，能夠在寫作中熟練運用這些詞匯。今天小編給大家?guī)砹送懈懽髟~匯如何才能運用自如,希望能夠幫助到大家，一起來學(xué)習(xí)吧。

托福寫作詞匯如何才能運用自如

一.閱讀詞匯量和寫作詞匯量有區(qū)別

所謂詞匯量，從宏觀出發(fā)指的是你所掌握的單詞總數(shù)。比如說你為了參加托福考試，整日茶飯不思，大門不出在家苦苦求索，用無數(shù)大腦細胞換來的單詞記憶量。這個首先保證的是你的閱讀能力，當(dāng)你看到這個單詞的時候好像形同陌路，也有點似曾相識，但是可以很大程度上幫助你理解整篇文章的意思，如此一來，你做TOEFL閱讀部分的時候，詞匯量的大小決定了你對文章的認知程度?？墒菍τ趯懽鞫裕@個單詞量就要另當(dāng)別論了，或許你可以有幾萬個單詞在大腦里，可是談到寫作，就很難用單詞量來衡量你的具體應(yīng)用了;換句話說，你認識他們每一個人，但是他們是不是認識你就不好說了。

二.如何積累托福寫作詞匯

很多同學(xué)背單詞的堅韌精神讓我佩服不已，但一如既往地記憶的確很好，可是在寫作方面還是有很多苦惱：一般是提筆忘字或者高級詞匯的使用，還有就是句型過于簡單羅列，使得整篇文章缺少亮點和層次感。想要避免提筆忘字，就要談到詞匯要怎么記憶了，純粹的單詞表記憶，破壞了單詞之間的聯(lián)系性，積累寫作方面的單詞，最好不要逐一地背單詞表，按照字母順序排列的單詞，彼此之間的聯(lián)系太少。針對這一特點，市場上TOEFL寫作類的圖書都做了很多調(diào)整，經(jīng)常在每篇范文之后附加了文章中好的詞匯和短語，這樣在你學(xué)習(xí)了范文的寫法之后，再回味一下文章中的詞匯精華，一舉兩得。如果有充分的時間，可以選擇一些文字類新聞多一些的英文網(wǎng)站。通過閱讀新聞來積累單詞，首先很多社會新聞可以成為我們寫作的構(gòu)思素材，其次多元化的新聞，不容易產(chǎn)生死背單詞的枯燥感。

三.托福寫作詞匯應(yīng)用方法

關(guān)于高級詞匯在托福寫作中的應(yīng)用，我覺得要順其自然。有些考生總是喜歡找一些級別高的單詞，甚至是被人冷落的單詞進行記憶，這就好像讓莎士比亞去考托福一樣，級別相差太多。我見過很多學(xué)生，尤其是高中生，因為記憶力還保持在茂盛期，所以偏愛這種類型的記憶;這樣做的優(yōu)點在于你的單詞量擴展得很好，基本可以參加GRE的考試，缺點就是犧牲太多時間，也會損害記憶能力。針對TOEFL考試，詞匯上的升級其實也很簡單，我們來看下邊這個例子：

important ?significant ?magnificent

具體應(yīng)用到句子中：

1. WTO is planning an important conference about commercial regulations。

2. It is a significant contribution to the society。

3. We have visited the magnificent Forbidden city。

這幾個詞大家都很熟悉，都有“重要，華麗”的意思。可是作為同級比較的形容詞，它們之間的關(guān)系則是遞進式的，其強調(diào)的重要或者華麗的程度也在逐漸提升。如果你按照這樣的順序來進行記憶，不但可以記牢這幾個單詞，而且可以得到如何應(yīng)用的真諦。所以所謂的高級詞匯的應(yīng)用，要從基礎(chǔ)開始，打好基礎(chǔ)之后再進行積累，切忌操之過急。再來看看下邊這個例子：

Humility humiliate humiliated humiliating

這幾個詞匯都是由humility衍生出來的，但是意思大不相同，humility是我們的傳統(tǒng)美德，叫做“謙卑”，和pride正好是反義詞;而humiliate卻是“使人蒙塵”的意思，humiliate和humiliating一般口語使用偏多，指的是“感覺很丟臉，沒有面子”。例如：I feel humiliated或者it is humiliating.有時候，與其花費大量時間去記憶新單詞和詞組，都不如在已經(jīng)掌握的單詞中進行聯(lián)想性的擴展來的有效和實惠。其實道理很簡單，說一個東西好，很好，到非常好，相當(dāng)好，甚至好到不能再好，這是一個縱向比較的記憶方法，按照級別的不同進行選擇性的記憶和使用。

我們再看看下邊這個例子：

So amazing are these crew members that they have successfully accomplished space walk，what a brilliant mission!

這句話是某英文網(wǎng)站對神舟七號的評價，這個屬于句子的倒裝，但是強調(diào)的內(nèi)容是amazing。這個詞意思很廣泛，而且同義詞也有很多，例如incredible, wonderful,甚至unbelievable，這里用amazing是表示難以置信的好，類似incredible，是對太空行走這次任務(wù)完成的積極評價，這就是高級詞匯的同等記憶了，這幾個詞都有“美妙，奇妙，難以置信”之類的意思，記憶的方法屬于橫向比較，也就是說，都是表示好到不能再好之類的意思，但是好的方向不同，所以單詞的選擇會有區(qū)別。

托福考試作文獨立寫作范文：擁有多項技能的人更成功

People who develop different skills are more successful than people who develop one skill only.

托福寫作范文參考:

When it comes to the qualities of successful people, people varying in education background and experience tend to give distinctive answers. Some would argue that those who are successful should be versatile and excel in lots of skills like communication skills, leadership skills and even organizational skills while others believe that one who is exceptional in one area is more likely to be successful. I personally believe that a versatile person with various skill sets can be more successful.

Admittedly, as the saying goes Jack of all trades and master of none and there are rare cases where some people who are expert in only one field stand out. However, it is more common for versatile people with multiple skills to be successful because of the following reasons.

First off, people who are talented and versatile are more competitive and competent in their career, and they enjoy a better change to be promoted in a professional setting. Actually, a lot of positions require a combination of skill sets, such as paying attention to details, knowledge in a specific field and communication skills, etc. Indeed, more skills will give someone more chance to get promoted. For instance, if a computer programmer just knows how to write program and focuses only on the technical side of the job, chances are that he would never get promoted. On the other hand, if not only does the computer programmer have programming skills but also he is a genius people-wise, he might get a better shot to be promoted as a manager in charge of a team of computer programmers. Thus, he can enjoy more opportunities in his career.

Additionally, it is much easier for a versatile person with various skill sets to build rapport with people and make friends. It is self-evident that people with all kinds of skills will be very attractive and charismatic. A person who not only has professional knowledge in one specific field but also has people skills and leadership skills will be very popular and standing out among his or her peers. For instance, my friend Alex, a bright young professional working in the financial industrial. He was awarded the most valuable banker in his company because of his professionalism and dedication to serving the customers and clients. Not only is he successful in his professional life, but also he is an amateur violinist. Actually, he plays for a city choir to represent the community and go against other cities' choir. Such skills can be very useful when building up connections with people and thus he can expand his social network easily. Furthermore, he can use these skills to entertain his clients and customers on certain occasions and have their trust on him.

In conclusion, a versatile person with various skill sets can be more competitive and outstrip others in the workplace, eventually they enjoy better chance to be promoted. Another advantage of having multiples skills is that it can be much easier and readily for them to network and expand their social connections.

托?？荚囎魑莫毩懽鞣段模夯ㄩL時間做重要決定是好品質(zhì)嗎

(A/D)Spending a long time in making an important decision is often considered as a bad quality. However, some people think that it is a good quality for a person.

舉一反三：

A/D: One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decision quickly; when a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he lead.

點睛

題目大意：花長時間做重要決定是一種好的品質(zhì)。建議選擇不同意，即認為快速做決策才是一種好的品質(zhì)，因為一是可以抓住機會，二是可以體現(xiàn)一個人超強的分析和預(yù)判能力。

2016年8月20日托福獨立寫作題目： A/D: One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decision quickly; when a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he lead. (來自學(xué)生回憶版，與原題可能有少許出入，但題干表達意思大體相同)

這是一篇難度較大的獨立寫作，首先所需要論證的題干中的快速做出決策的這一點就相對而言比較抽象，尤其是對于中學(xué)生考生而言，因為首先在思路上很難對題干形成有效的展開，其次大部分同學(xué)平時素材的積累很少，更別說這類關(guān)于領(lǐng)導(dǎo)類的素材。

寫作參考一:

With the society becoming increasingly complex, we make numerous decisions every single day, some of which are simple while others of which are more complex. The issue whether Spending a long time in making an important decision is often considered as a good quality has triggered a hot debate. Personally speaking, my answer towards this question is negative, that is, making quick decision is good, for the following reasons.

First of all, making quick decisions can help people grasp the precious opportunities.As is known to all, change is the permanent topic in nearly every area of life including day-to-day life and business world. In other words, the opportunities may vanish in the blink of an eye. As a result, people who spend much time pondering different paths for the fear of making errors may end up missing out the chances. On the contrary, quick decision making will boost the likelihood of seizing the opportunities, which makes his or her have an edge over other competitors. This is especially true of the business competition. In the commercial world, To illustrate, a decisive leader will not block subordinates from getting things done and thus . For example, if an entrepreneur find changes in the needs of customers, there is a need of quick decisions to satisfy their new demand. Without quick response to the appeals of the clients, competitors around the same business may take the initiative to make headway in these emerging markets.

Apart from that, making quick decicions reflects the strong ability of analysis of a person. As is common sense, analytical skills is a basis for quick decision making. As you can see, an analytical skill is the ability of a person to draw conclusions and to make quality decisions based on incomplete information. Put it in another way, the characteristic of analytical people is to address all of the critical elements needed for a successful outcome more quickly than average persons can do. Consequently, these decisive people will leave a good impression on others and thus improve their charisma. By contrast, spending too much time in making decisions means that you can only make up your mind after collecting all the information. This practice may make others feel that you are hesitant in doing things.

Admittedly, some opponents may assert that it is a good quality to spend a long time in decision-making, because the quality of the decision certainly depends on the speed of making it. However, the above claim has overlooked a fact that no matter how much time you spend making a decision, there is always a chance that it won’t turn out the way you had envisioned. In this case, the quick decision making can help you more timely fix the wrong decisions.

In a nutshell, spending long time in decision making is anything but a good quality, because people will let opportunities slip off and leave a indecisive impression on others.

寫作參考二:

An efficient leader is a key factor for the successful development of an enterprise and how to define an effective leader varies from person to person. Some people may believe a leader must make a quick decision to be successful since opportunity seldom knocks twice. However, some others contradict with the statement and they argue that leaders, especially those in the area of politics and business, have to be patient enough to be considerate. From my perspective, I am more favor of the former one.

When it comes to the area of business, leaders have to acclimatize themselves to the constantly changing environment and respond soon enough to grasp the chance. A number of examples can be found around us to demonstrate the exceptional urgency of making quick decision. Mark Zuckerberg made a quick decision to acquire Instagram, which turned out to be bold but successful, given Twitter, one of Facebook’s strongest competitors, had already considered to merge Ins. Besides, the landslide of Apple over Nokia, one of the giants in the phones’ market can prove the importance of responding quick for leaders. Those leaders of conventional ideas in Nokia stuck to manufacturing keyboard phones and still refused to center on developing and researching Touch-screen technology, which has proven to be a big mistake. As a result, Nokia had to declare bankruptcy. When reflecting on the failure of Nokia and success of Apple, the key is to make a quick decision to reform products to satisfy consumers’ tastes and demands.

Speaking of national leaders, making a swift and effective decision will be highly indispensable to deal with various emergencies. To prevent the exacerbation of some events, politicians have to take quick and credible actions. For instance, the outburst of Ebola virus has caused serious damage to human beings and as a leader of a country, he has to make an instantaneous decision to assemble medical experts and restrict the migration movement of population. Another convincing example would be the military action aiming at ISIS, a self-proclaimed country but a terror organization. The president of the United States called on Britain and several other Western countries to launch a joint military strike to crack down those terrorists after many innocent civilians including journalists, local residents or tourists from different country were killed by those extremists. Although the terror group was not wiped out yet, the immediate action had played a major role in reducing threats from those. Obviously, for politicians and national leaders, it is necessary to take quick action.

Admittedly, there is also an opposite voice echoing that leaders have to be patient to reduce the possibilities of causing missteps. For instance, during World War Two, to win the success, Franklin Roosevelt gave the order to hit Japan by dropping atomic bombs soon after the Pearl Harbor was attacked. The explosion of those two atomic bombs led Japan to surrender, however, caused huge damage to local environment. It appears plausible, however, the consequences of not using atomic bombs would be more disastrous because of Japan militarism’s great harm to the entire human beings.

To conclude, leaders have to make a response and decision as quick as possible in most occasions no matter which field they are in.