托?？荚囍锌忌鷮懽鞣謹?shù)存在兩個較為明顯的分水嶺，一個是22分左右，另一個是25分左右。這兩個分數(shù)線大致劃分出了托福考生真實寫作水平的3個階段。下面小編就和大家分享福寫作如何突破22分瓶頸 ，來欣賞一下吧。

托福寫作如何突破22分瓶頸?抓住詞匯語法和句子更能提分

托福寫作22分瓶頸在哪里?

一般來說，托福寫作在分數(shù)方面公認的瓶頸有兩處，一個在22分左右，這個瓶頸是用來區(qū)分考生基本寫作技能和基礎(chǔ)是否到位的。合格的考生能拿到22分，寫作基礎(chǔ)不扎實的同學(xué)則往往很難突破。而另一個瓶頸25分則可以看成是高分線，本文暫不做討論。22分的分數(shù)瓶頸，其實主要集中在3個方面，也就是考生在寫作時的詞匯、語法和句式的掌握和運用能力。下面就來分開討論。

托福寫作詞匯運用要恰當(dāng)?shù)轿?/p>

很多同學(xué)可能覺得托福寫作用詞很簡單，只要把詞匯背熟根據(jù)中文意思直接用到對應(yīng)的文章里去就行了。這其實就犯了錯誤。英文寫作和中文不同，很多時候詞匯之間是存在搭配組合關(guān)系的，有些固定搭配只有配合特定詞匯在句子的特定位置使用才符合要求?？忌绻皇歉鶕?jù)英文詞匯的中文意思來強行塞入句中，那就很容易出現(xiàn)各類用詞問題。很多同學(xué)在背單詞時只背中文意思，既不看英文原意也不讀示范例句，這種做法常會導(dǎo)致寫作用詞的問題。小編建議大家在平時寫作或者閱讀時就要注意積累這方面的知識經(jīng)驗，特別是一些自己還沒有掌握的詞匯和表達方法，一定要養(yǎng)成隨時記錄經(jīng)?；仡櫟暮昧?xí)慣。托福詞匯如果能夠運用得恰當(dāng)?shù)轿?，往往能給考官留下很好的印象，細節(jié)處見真章就是如此。

托福寫作語法切忌自由發(fā)揮

托福語法上存在問題的情況相對詞匯來說更少一些，因為考生對于自己不熟悉的語法經(jīng)常會下意識地去避免使用。而語法錯誤大多出現(xiàn)在備考中練習(xí)寫作打基礎(chǔ)的初期階段，而考生往往自己就能發(fā)現(xiàn)問題并且盡快解決掉。之后再出現(xiàn)語法錯誤其實也是以粗心為主。因此考生想要避免在托福寫作中出現(xiàn)語法錯誤，只需要在寫作過程中以及寫完后的檢查環(huán)節(jié)里多加細心就可以了。當(dāng)然考生如果在考托福的同時還準備參加SAT/CAT/GMAT等涉及到語法知識的考試，那么對于提升托福寫作的語法也是很有幫助的，可以起到補充提升的作用。

托福寫作句子請控制長度

托福寫作突破22分瓶頸的最后一個關(guān)鍵在于句式。對于句式大家常會擁有的一個錯誤印象是為了高分要多寫長句復(fù)雜句。其實這個思路是存在問題的。長句復(fù)雜句如果能夠駕馭好使用得當(dāng)自然可以成為加分項。但實際情況時很多同學(xué)其實并不具備這份功底，寫出來的長句往往存在各種各樣句式上的問題。這樣的長句不僅對提分毫無幫助，反而會暴露出更多的扣分點。所以，如果考生想要拿到較好的作文分數(shù)，對長句的使用務(wù)必要謹慎，沒有把握的情況下不要寫太過復(fù)雜的句式。另外，長句使用即使本身不存在明顯的錯誤，但如果會干擾到考官對文章的閱讀和理解，造成負面的閱讀體驗，同樣也會招致扣分。所以，大家還是盡量按照一句話只說清楚一件事的原則來寫作比較好。保證每個句子能夠讓人讀通讀懂。句子之間保持好合理通順的邏輯關(guān)系，這樣的句式使用對于22分來說就已經(jīng)足夠了。

綜上所述，托福寫作22分的瓶頸想要突破，考生就需要在詞匯語法和句式上多下功夫，上文中提到的這些提分要點和注意事項，希望各位同學(xué)能夠多加參考學(xué)習(xí)。最后小編預(yù)祝大家能在托福寫作中順利突破瓶頸拿到理想成績。

托?？荚囎魑莫毩懽鞣段模簩W(xué)習(xí)有限的課程對身心發(fā)展有用嗎

In a word, studying only limited courses will be supportive for students’ physical and mental growth as well as their future careers.

2月27日: High school students are required to study many different subjects at same time or they should study only three or four subject at a time, which do you agree?

范文參考一:

As for me, studying only three or four subjects appears to be a better choice and the listed reasons and examples will support what I believe.

To begin with, current young students have been under enormous pressure, doing great harm to their growth, and there is no need to impose too much pressure on them. To be more specific, to strengthen students’ future competitiveness in the society, most schools have expected to forge students’ various capacities since they were young by arranging a huge number of curriculums. What an ordinary high school student has to experience in his one-day school life can demonstrate how depressed and exhausted present high school students are. Getting up as early as 6AM has become common in recent two decades. Afterwards, a whole-day study will include various compulsory and optional courses like Mathematics that leads to intellectual stimulation or History that demands students to attempt to memorize historic events and relative effects as many as possible. When class is over, it is still far away from ending one-day study since lots of assignments such as the short essays or scientific researches need to be finished. Evidently, students suffer from the huge pressure from study, leading many of them to wear glasses at a young age and to be drained physically and mentally everyday. Thus, students are not supposed to be ordered to study many courses at a time.

To be followed, the inadequacy of enough leisure time will contribute students to have no chances to engage in what they interested in. High school students are still involved in an age during which they should exploit their own interests to decide which area they will choose when going to college in their near future. However, like I mentioned in the previous statement, to meet the requirements set by school; students have no option but to immerse themselves in a number of assignments and the freedom to pursue their own hobbies has been deprived. It is known to all that interest plays a leading role in assisting people to choose their future career and a recent released statistic in a survey conducted by Beijing Human Resource General Bureau indicates that approximately 67 percent of college undergraduates switch their professions from their major-related areas to what they are truly interested in their third year after graduation. In addition, many of the respondents claim that they are not satisfied with the current educational system, requiring students to study a wide range of curriculums, because it entirely downplays the importance of cultivating students’ hobbies and they believe that the earlier students can discover their interest, the more setbacks they can avoid when choosing future majors in the university and upcoming professors after graduation. A friend I know named Andy refused to become a mechanical engineer since he was bored to stay in the office building and finally chose to become a teacher in a educational institute since he can apply his passion and extrovert personality into the profession. Accordingly, student should be given more opportunities to develop their own hobbies to explore what they love.

寫作參考二:

Do you agree or disagree high-school students are required to study many different subjects at same time or they should study only three or four subjects at a time.

Teenagers are in the prime time of their life. What they learn in this period is a huge factor in determining their whole life. To make better use of this valuable time, some educators advocate that students are supposed to study as many subjects as possible at a time. However, I don’t think it is a smart move. Instead, studying three or four subjects at a time would serve them better.

To begin with, only three or four subjects at a time ensure that students have enough time and energy to make further research in each of these fields. It allows them to bite deeply into these subjects, thus gaining the whole picture of a certain field in their mind rather than just a smattering of knowledge. It is not hard to imagine what they would suffer when they have too many things in their plate. They would find themselves wrestling with complex chemical formulas, intertwined history events and distinctions between invertebrates and amphibians on the same very day. In consequence, they would end up with spreading themselves too thin and cannot gain a deeper understanding in any of the fields.

Besides, when students are allowed to choose three or four subjects at a time based on their own interest, they would performer better without under a huge amount of mental pressure. As an old saying goes, interest is the best teacher. When what they learn really appeal to them, they are more keen on their school work. On the contrary, if they are forced to learn too many subjects at a time, chances are that they not only cannot be guaranteed with good grade but also get upset and frustrated. Things may get even worse when they find some of these subjects are extremely bothersome and annoying. I have experienced the suffering. When I was in high school, history was the most difficult one for me. Those intertwined history events, exact dates of those events, and various complex names of important figures involved in them just drove me crazy. When the finals were just around the corner, I always burnt mid-night oil to hit history books, feeling so tense and stressed up. So only when students spend their time on just three or four subjects that truly attractive to them can they get good grade on each subject and enjoy their high-school time happily.

What cannot be denied is that there are such versatile brainiacs who can handle with so many subjects at the same time without any difficulty. However, only a small fraction of students are in this line. For most of the students in high school, three or four subjects at a time are more acceptable and effective for their study.

To sum up, I am on the board with the idea that students will benefit more from taking just three or four subjects at a time.