你想知道如何改進(jìn)新的GRE寫作嗎?關(guān)于GRE寫作有很多秘密你還不知道，gre寫作技巧,gre考試培訓(xùn)就像你想知道如何提高你的GRE寫作經(jīng)驗一樣。今天小編就和大家分享gre寫作提分內(nèi)容分享,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

gre寫作提分內(nèi)容分享

GRE寫作經(jīng)驗：研究模式

所謂范文，是眾多GRE考試專家學(xué)者總結(jié)出的重要指導(dǎo)材料。這都是為試題寫的一篇高分的樣本文章。因此，考生要做的不僅是背誦范文，還要逐字分析范文，分析文章的邏輯順序、選詞、修辭，這些都是難得的財富。

GRE寫作技巧：準(zhǔn)備模板

每個GRE候選人都需要有自己的寫作模板。在考場里，許多學(xué)生可能因為緊張而大腦短路。一些他們經(jīng)常練習(xí)的詞匯或邏輯會突然消失，在他們的腦海中留下一片空白。這就要求考生在平時總結(jié)不同的模板，增加更多的記憶。即使是在考場緊張的時候，大腦也會有條件地反映一些有組織的句子，為他的作文增光添彩。

GRE寫作小貼士：修改文章

許多考生甚至在備考和練習(xí)作文時也經(jīng)常寫作。但事實上，作文一旦出版，就不能上架。需要多修改、多檢查、多補(bǔ)缺，gre寫作技巧,gre考試培訓(xùn)隨時查找自己文章的不足之處。只有反復(fù)修改，才能提高我們的寫作和創(chuàng)作水平。

GRE寫作經(jīng)驗：勤于思考

有思想的生活是充實的，gre作文也是。我們看別人的優(yōu)秀作品，首先要學(xué)習(xí)，其次要比較，看為什么別人的觀點比自己的更合適，這樣才能提高自己對問題的看法。三個人一定要有我的老師，不斷學(xué)習(xí)，多思考，豐富自己的大腦，為自己的創(chuàng)作提供素材。

GRE寫作經(jīng)驗：熟悉題庫

GRE作文的一大亮點是作文題庫的完全開放。因此，如果考生能夠?qū)︻}庫中的每一篇文章進(jìn)行邏輯分析，記住每一個問題的邏輯分析，gre寫作技巧,gre考試培訓(xùn)就可以節(jié)省你大量的考試時間，更合理地安排你的作文創(chuàng)作，而無需在考試過程中再次分析問題的邏輯，浪費不必要的時間。

GRE寫作：善于學(xué)習(xí)

備考GRE不能閉門造車，集思廣益，通過各種方式和更多的考試朋友和老師交流來更快提高。有時，你的意見和討論可能會突然間通過你對一件事的意見。大多數(shù)時候，你的討論對你來說只是很多不同的角度。多學(xué)點東西對你有好處。

GRE寫作高分范文：北美GRE寫作滿分范文

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GRE首段

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

GRE中間段1

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

GRE中間段2

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

GRE中間段3

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

GRE末端

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

GRE這篇官方欽定滿分的范文，其最明顯的優(yōu)點在于：

1. 字?jǐn)?shù)高達(dá)599words, GRE充分體現(xiàn)了字?jǐn)?shù)為王的判分傾向。

2. 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的五段制，首段、GRE末端，中間三段，看上去很美。

3. 沒有陳詞濫調(diào)、GRE滿篇廢話的模板式語言。

只有以上三點離滿分還是很遠(yuǎn)的，GRE之所以SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各盡其責(zé)，既獨立又統(tǒng)一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:

1. 首段再現(xiàn)了原TOPIC的推理過程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不適;尤其令閱卷人高興的是：首段在最后簡化羅列了推理中的三個問題。要知道美國人就喜歡的作文---總分式，在首段就把三個ideas羅列出來，然后在中間三段分別展開，先總后分，一目了然。

2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可謂是一針見血，一劍封喉。對于這樣嚴(yán)重的推理漏洞，如果不首先指出，其argument必然軟弱乏力。此所謂Topic中的 “必削點”，不可不察。

3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”這可謂是劍走偏鋒，獨辟蹊徑，出人所料。文章竟然批評了Topic以錢為本經(jīng)營理念，提出了要以人為本，這樣寫是有一定風(fēng)險，畢竟這不是Issue。那本文是如何化險為夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得長舒一口，人家再次回歸了，又回到了Topic中以“Money”為本的推理。

4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”這充分體現(xiàn)了作者不只是坐而論道的arguer，而是關(guān)心其可行性的現(xiàn)實主義者，考慮到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

5. 末端不但對首段提出的論點做出了重復(fù)性的總結(jié)，GRE而且又不厭其煩地把中間三段的ideas一一羅列。如此“啰嗦”估計令某些同學(xué)略有不齒，但這恰恰是美國人的最愛，cultural shock了吧?

本文最令我欣賞的地方，GRE就是對EXAMPLES的運用

1. 中間段一，運用了“設(shè)例”GRE(假設(shè)的情況)，$100 million啦、$5,000了，很幼稚是吧?可美國人喜歡啊;咱中國的學(xué)生，尤其是理工科的，喜歡用一些相當(dāng)高深的例子，有沒有想過那些閱卷老師能看懂嗎?尤其是在極短時間內(nèi)，他們IQ又不高，知識又不多，聯(lián)想又不豐富……

2. 中間段二，運用了“具例”GRE(具體的例子)，舉一個婦孺皆知的Toyota例子把想說明的問題統(tǒng)統(tǒng)道出，再次體現(xiàn)出美國人喜歡淺顯易懂的事例。

3. 中間段三，運用了“泛例”GRE(某一類人、團(tuán)體或組織)，通過采煤行業(yè)指出了計劃可行性的所受到的制約，一個多么質(zhì)樸無華的泛例，充分地考慮到了閱卷老師的理解能力。

以上這一切怎能不讓美國閱卷者頻頻頷首，GRE嘖嘖稱善呢?他或她手中的筆在紙上劃出了一條美麗的弧線 —— 6

相反，有些中國學(xué)生，憑借自己繁密的邏輯、GRE淵深的例子和云霧繚繞的行文，每每令那些閱卷者咬唇咂舌，shrug連連，又怎能獲得一個理想的分?jǐn)?shù)呢?你挑戰(zhàn)了他的智商，他必然報復(fù)你的分?jǐn)?shù)。

GRE寫作四法助你考試

拆分法

分析題目極為有效的一種手段，其基本原理就是面對一個云山霧罩的抽象的大的概念，將其一分為二或者一分為多進(jìn)行分別討論。

解析法

通過對題目主體的需求進(jìn)行分析，從而找到支持論證的有說服力的理由與典型的論據(jù)。主體需求，可以是個人，教育，社會，政府與文化發(fā)展等方面的需求。

正反法

對題目的主張或者結(jié)論分成兩面分析。沒有絕對對錯，哪邊理由與例證多我們走哪邊。也可寫成讓步式或者對照式兩面論證。

比較法

適用于題干中兩個對等概念的比較。

這四種解題辦法可以交替結(jié)合使用，我們一起來看一下典型的例子：

例子："Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study.They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."

相信這個題會比較簡單。大的概念是Study是否需要質(zhì)疑，要看學(xué)習(xí)的內(nèi)容。

1.如果是Well established principles and theories，就別質(zhì)疑爭議了吧?各專業(yè)的同學(xué)可以列舉出一堆這樣的內(nèi)容。

2.如果是Controversial issues，就質(zhì)疑爭議好了。找你最有話可說的領(lǐng)域爭議一番。

最好寫的可質(zhì)疑爭議內(nèi)容包括：Stem cell research，abortion，same sex marriage，nuclear power 等。