在新gre寫作中拿到高分并不容易，所以要知道GRE作文備考重點(diǎn)。今天小編就和大家分享GRE作文備考重點(diǎn)注意,希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE作文備考重點(diǎn)注意

準(zhǔn)備GRE作文最重要的一步是熟悉題庫，gre考試介紹,gre考試培訓(xùn)認(rèn)真準(zhǔn)備提綱。對(duì)于一個(gè)問題，有必要自己畫一個(gè)完整的提綱。當(dāng)然，你可以參考各種材料，但你必須經(jīng)常用你的大腦來思考大綱的邏輯連續(xù)性。事實(shí)上，有偏見但不是絕對(duì)的思考才是最簡(jiǎn)單的開始。

對(duì)于論證來說，熟悉題庫更為重要。很多人認(rèn)為他們可以很容易地從一個(gè)話題中挑出五六個(gè)錯(cuò)誤。正常情況下是的，但也有一些問題。如果你沒有提前做好準(zhǔn)備，五分鐘內(nèi)你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)兩個(gè)錯(cuò)誤。在第一次考試中，我錯(cuò)過了一個(gè)題目，在準(zhǔn)備過程中我只發(fā)現(xiàn)了兩個(gè)錯(cuò)誤，而我在正式考試中遇到了這個(gè)題目，所以我寫得很差。

盡管邏輯作文的滿分只有6分，但不要低估它的重要性。從某種程度上說，GRE考試是一種邏輯，用英語寫兩篇文章只是形式，gre考試介紹,gre考試培訓(xùn)所以它是GRE作文的精髓。主要目的是檢查你的邏輯分析水平。

寫反駁論文有很多技巧，比如區(qū)分“事實(shí)”和“觀點(diǎn)”的能力。不管標(biāo)題中給出的事實(shí)有多夸張，你都要認(rèn)為它們是對(duì)的。你不能攻擊他們。只能攻擊意見中的邏輯漏洞，不能攻擊與統(tǒng)計(jì)、統(tǒng)計(jì)方法有關(guān)的邏輯錯(cuò)誤，最多只能帶一次。

GRE寫作高分范文：思想家

GRE寫作題目：

Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when they claim to admire them.

大多數(shù)社會(huì)都沒把最偉大的思想家當(dāng)回事，雖然有時(shí)候這些社會(huì)自稱是求才若渴的。

GRE寫作范文：

In this busy，packed and dull world，people's most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money，to support their family，to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are，not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly，in some cases，people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however，they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers' thoughts are. The fact is，in history of human civilizations，most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.

Generally，whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in，they have similar characteristics，such as high intelligence，eccentric temperament，wide range of knowledge，and the most essential one： the deeply and often predicted thoughts，which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand，it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand，it is also the thoughts，however correct and predicted，which cause these elites out of the mass' sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer，whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job，Nietzche lived an impoverished life， which along with loneliness defeated him at last： he became insane when 45，and died 10 years later. Until that time，almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today，many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.

In some worse cases，the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts，which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas，which are against the old ones，are accepted by mass，the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times，most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish，however，always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people's minds beforehand，are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus，who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time，it hadn't come out of press until the year before Copernicus' death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches，which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.

GRE寫作高分范文：避免偏激

題目：

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

人們總是在尋找相同點(diǎn)，即使是在非常不同的事物間也不例外，甚至有時(shí)候這樣做是無用乃至有害的。實(shí)際上，我們應(yīng)該具體問題具體分析;我們應(yīng)該盡量避免比較的傾向。

正文：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for

similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.