gre寫作是很多學子的痛點，大家都發(fā)愁gre寫作修改，如何在gre寫作過程中做一些正確的修改呢?下面小編就和大家分享gre寫作過程中如何做好修改工作，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

gre寫作過程中如何做好修改工作?

gre寫作修改方法

1、積累足夠多的形容詞，辨析他們之間的不同，vocabulary.com是個很棒的網站。里面有近義詞的辨析。比如significant, vital, crucial, critical, indispensable都是重要，那具體有什么區(qū)別呢?

2、不要放過英語場景，那是學習形容詞準確意思的非常好的機會。比如某期美國好聲音里shakira在形容一個歌手聲音的時候用的詞是otherworldly，那么因為我們實際的聽到了那個聲音，所有會真正的理解在老外眼里什么聲音是“空靈的”。

3、在gre寫作過程中覺得有個詞不好，又沒有積累的情況下，可以找相關的可能出現這個詞的英語場景。比如我寫了a good job， 但是不知道還能用什么詞來替代good, 那我認為在wikipedia上搜索“the pursuit of happiness”《當幸福來敲門》應該會找到答案。

gre寫作修改的過程就是一個提高的過程，絕對不能寫完了不改就扔在一邊，那樣只能停留在原來的水平。推薦大家先不限時寫幾篇，寫完一篇就立刻打印出來逐字逐句修改，把過于簡單的詞和句子一一替換，注意別用太難的詞和沒把握的詞，能用到6級詞匯就差不多了，如果想要添加一下較難的詞匯建議大家用詞典將相應單詞查找出來，用進文章里，并且將這個詞的含義，詞性，用法以及搭配都摘抄到筆記本上。久而久之，你便會形成自己的單詞庫，還能在無意識間擴大詞匯量。

修改gre寫作還需要做的一點就是找到自己認為漂亮實用的句式，往自己的gre獨立寫作里套。尤其開頭段，結尾段以及中間各段的銜接，找到了漂亮的句式就從此永遠用這個不要再改了，這就是自己獨家的寫作模板。

GRE寫作高分范文：成功

Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it.

成功，無論是學術上的還是職業(yè)上的，都涉及了適應新環(huán)境并最終改變新環(huán)境的能力。

GRE寫作范文：

Many wonder the intrinsic impact of industrial revolution over the last century. Is it a blessing or a curse? Ever since the invention of steam engine, mass production enabled factories to make out products in a madly efficient manner, while machines also supplanted innumerous traditionally skilled artisan, forcing them out of work. Gone are the days when they boasted of their craftsmanship that they assumed to be able support their family all their life. Consumers became more aspiring to novel design instead of durability as goods were made to be discarded.

Hundreds years later, with the first installation of integrated circuit on the chip, another profound turnover took place. Now the computer pervades our life so much that one may find himself half illiterate in absence of input skill. This time, thousands of jobs were created in Silicon Valley, transforming some of the few into billionaire over one night. Nevertheless, the original inventor might not expect that the ensuing slow down and thus recession in IT sector would approach so soon in less than 10 years, which is obviously less than a presumable 15 years time normal for a periodical change.Positive or negative, one mark that characterizes the technological bombardment indicates a constant fact: changes exist ubiquitously and operating at an ever-increasing tempo; those who fail to catch up with the torrent of change would ineluctably engulfed by billows, floating no where and eventually dissolve as negligible bubbles.

Favors as well as opportunities goes to who adapt to the contemporary trend. Fully recognizing this axiom, long before the scientists announced accomplishment of sketches of human genes or earlier successful cloning of Doris, candidates preparing for university admission have smelt the sense. Today, in the U.S., biology and its branch disciplines become the first choice for top students of senior high, determining that this subject, foretold as the third wave in technology, could bring them brilliant future as “Bill Gates” dreamt the same in the previous wave.

In addition to academic realm, respect would be paid to people who though deprived of their past secure professions, choose not to be a loser in the whimsical society. Like the artisans who lost jobs, a vast number of skilled laborer in China’s city of Wengzhou have undergone darkness and depression in those old days. However, after years of endeavor and refinement, they prove their value again. By accurately posit the economic trend and market demand, they play an active role in almost all economic sectors, garments, catering and lodging, hi-tech industry, you name it.

While ability honed in surviving the fickleness of the world makes the path through success shorter, it is essential for the more ambitious to acquire the pith of reformist and lead the trend. In this way, it could help him distinguish from the mediocracy and platitude. This is absolutely not an easy task. Inborn insight and foresight are needed to tell uncommon out of the commonplace; extraordinary perseverance and encouragement is a must to face the coming challenges against his iconoclasm. Very few people crowned with triumph possess this quality, whether the Nobel Prize winner or those who makes coverage on the Times.

In sum, as shown in the course of history, success, whether academic or professional,involves an ability to surviving in a new environment and---, eventually, ---to change it.Now some elite persons have again forecast that another social change is impending.Are you ready for that?

GRE寫作高分范文：政治的統(tǒng)一與分歧

The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus.

政治的目的不應該是追求一種理想，而是尋求共同點和合理的一致。

GRE寫作范文：

I safely agree with the speaker's argument that the search for common ground and reasonable consensus is the goal of politics. But I am reserved to support his or her idea that the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal. The pursuit of an ideal is not doomed to conflict with the search for consensus.

Politics, as it was defined is an art of balancing, that is to keep subtle balance between different parties, which represent vested interests of different groups, hold different ideologies, to harmonize disparate social organization such as Green peace organization and Arms manufacture association, to concert different development plan and the like. Various interests of different groups intertwined together, forming a huge net. It is this net that restrains any individual part's self-intention and possible partial proposal, makes the leaders think over before leap. In this way, the policy making would be more stable and reasonable, meanwhile the majority’s interests could be taken care of. A convincing example in this point is the nomination of the candidate of President in certain party. One must be selected from tens of candidates who are on the behalf of different groups. At first, every group may name his own representatives,but the winner is single. After seeing his nomination is not supported by the majority,thus has no chance to win, they will compromise on the premise that their core interests are ensured, select the one who can be accepted by most groups if not all to reach reasonable consensus, This interacting relation is the fundament of democracy, which marks a country's civilization degree and propel the society to forge ahead.

When it comes to another point of the speaker’s argument, namely the goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal; my attitude sharply varies between different explanations and comprehensions on the key word- ideal. If ideal was defined as impractical ideas- castle in the air, of course, it should not be the base for the policy-making. The leader with hollow ideal may lead his people to abyss, such as the former Iraq president ‘s dream of his “Arab empire”. However, if the ideal was defined as certain ground and reasonable ambition, it could even be argued that the very difference between politician and statesman comes from the pursuit of ideal. Politicians do with the ideal, statesman without. The most brilliant politicians in the history are those who are harboring holy but ground ideals, cherish their ideals as the source of commitment.

In a sum, politics has its specific trait, once an individual steps on the power stage; he (or she) will greatly influence the rest of people, and his (or her) decision impacting the interests of various groups are unavoidable to be the result of compromise, a wiser politician will pursuit their reasonable ideals and move ahead on the process of compromise.