gre寫作考試一直是很多學(xué)子的心頭大事，如何做好gre寫作備考?下面小編就和大家分享gre寫作考試備考資料簡介，希望能夠幫助到大家，來欣賞一下吧。

gre寫作考試備考資料簡介

gre寫作備考

1. 對于時間充裕的同學(xué)

gre寫作資料中的高頻是出現(xiàn)頻率高的作文,沒有人能保證考時一定遇到高頻題. 如果還有不少時間,建議不要放棄任何一道題, 很多經(jīng)驗證明了，很多考生都有可能遇到有史以來第一次考到的ISSUE和ARGU題, 所以什么事情都是有可能發(fā)生的(就好象指出ARGU里的邏輯錯誤一樣)

2. 對于時間不那么充裕的同學(xué)

如何利用gre寫作考試準(zhǔn)備ISSUE。建議準(zhǔn)備出現(xiàn)頻率最高的40道ISSUE,注意這里指的頻率指的是近兩年的總頻率,不分時間地域,同時加上本月本地出現(xiàn)3次以上的ISSUE題(大部分已經(jīng)包括在前40道里,因此需要另外準(zhǔn)備的不多).

拿我個人來說,我在北京考,考前準(zhǔn)備了總頻超過30次的38道ISSUE(3.8備考資料的數(shù)據(jù),現(xiàn)在可能有更新)+5至6道北京3月出現(xiàn)3次以上同時未包括在這38道中的題,考試時遇到的兩道 177,141分別出現(xiàn)39,38次,均為高頻。

就我考前從各種渠道了解的信息，絕大部分人考時遇到一道頻數(shù)大于30的可能性是相當(dāng)大的。(也許有人會說很多人并沒有來報備考資料，我的數(shù)據(jù)不一定可靠。這個就見仁見智了，我只是表達(dá)個人的建議，采納與否，全是個人的自由.但無疑當(dāng)考前時間不夠時,準(zhǔn)備出現(xiàn)機(jī)率較大的題目顯然是特殊情況下的最佳選擇了)

如何利用gre作文備考資料準(zhǔn)備ARGU。重要的是多熟悉題目,時間充裕的應(yīng)該做到任何一道題都沒有不認(rèn)識的單詞,不理解的語句,這樣找錯才能有的放矢.

時間不夠的,至少把考過10次以上的題目(約90多道) 加上本月本地出現(xiàn)過但未列入上述90多道的題目全過一遍,弄懂每一個單詞.這很重要,否則考場上碰到關(guān)鍵單詞不認(rèn)識,加上緊張,可就傻眼了.拿我來說,考時遇到的是10幾頻的題,幸好考前晚上剛過了一遍,否則文中有兩個單詞都不認(rèn)識,顯然會很不爽.

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??

"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??

The?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?should?lose?his?job.??It?is?clear?that?his?analysis?of?the?decrease?in?attendance?in?the?past?year?was?incomplete.??A?better?qualified?individual?might?have?explored?the?issue?further?by?doing?several?different?things.??First?of?all,?surveys?of?the?general?population?could?provide?a?clue?to?the?decreased?viewership.?They?may?find?that?people?aren't?as?willing?to?pay?the?high?prices?anymore.??A?survey?may?also?reveal?that?people?are?aware?of?Silver?Screen,?but?opt?not?to?see?the?films.??An?inspection?of?the?nature?of?the?films?made?by?Silver?Screen?could?also?hint?to?the?root?of?the?problem.??If?Silver?Screen?produces?a?lot?of?the?same?type?of?movie,?then?the?problem?may?be?that?they?don't?produce?enough?to?appeal?to?the?diverse?interests?of?the?population.??For?instance,??if?their?movies?typically?contain?excessive?violence?and?foul?language,?parents?won't?take?their?children?to?these?films.??That?is?a?significant?portion?of?the?potential?viewing?population?lost.??

The?ad?director?mentions?that?reviewers?liked?specific?films?and?gave?more??favorable?reviews?than?in?the?past.??But?he?neglects?to?mention?the?specific?numbers-?critics?may?have?raved?about?2?movies?and?turned?their?thumbs?down?the?10?others.??If?thats'?the?case,?it's?no?wonder?that?viewership?has?declined.??

Spending?more?on?advertising,?and?less?on?production,?as?the?ad?director?suggests,?could?drive?the?company?out?of?business.??If?the?media?builds?alot?of?hype?over?a?new?release?that?was?poorly?produced,?people?are?more?likely?to?be?disappointed,?and?skeptical?about?future?productions.??This?is?certainly?not?in?the?company's?best?interests.?What?is?in?the?company's?best?interest?is?a?broader?scope?of?the?problem,?and?different?approaches?to?solving?i??

Commentary??

This?strong?response?begins?with?an?attack?on?the?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?but?quickly?shifts?to?identifying?major?flaws?in?the?argument.??The?main?points?of?the?critique?are?that??

--?the?real?reasons?for?a?decline?in?viewership?have?not?yet?been????identified;?

--?Silver?Screen?may?not?produce?different?kinds?of?movies?to?appeal?to????diverse?interests;?

--?the?number?of?favorably?reviewed?movies?may?actually?have?been????very?low;?and?

--?spending?money?to?produce?a?possibly?poor?movie?could?hurt?rather than?help?the?company.??

Although?more?points?are?made?here?than?are?made?in?the?sample?6?response?on?this?topic,?each?of?the?points?made?in?the?6?paper?is?developed.??That?is?not?the?case?here.??In?this?response,?each?point?is?supported?(by?perhaps?an?additional?sentence),?but?it?is?not?further?developed.??The?paper?is?smoothly?organized?with?few?but?appropriate?transitions.??The?writing?is?strong?with?some?variety?in?syntax.??For?these?reasons,?this?response?earns?a?score?of?5.

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??

"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??

Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?company's?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.??Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics'?reviews.??Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.??If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.??Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.??The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.??The?company's?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.??

Commentary??

This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.??Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.??

The?essay?identifies?four?points:??

--?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?

--?the?movies'?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing

--?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather????than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?

--?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home????computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters??

Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.??But?the?paper's?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.??It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.