很多同學(xué)GRE寫作為什么會(huì)丟分，今天小編給大家?guī)?lái)GRE寫作丟分原因，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。

GRE寫作：丟分原因

1. 邏輯混亂。

2.過(guò)于主觀。

3.中式思維/表達(dá)。

4.過(guò)分注重用詞。

大體上來(lái)說(shuō)，同學(xué)們的邏輯問(wèn)題是最多的。邏輯問(wèn)題有三種，通篇邏輯，段落之間，段落之中。

其實(shí)這可能和我們高中初中的英語(yǔ)教育有關(guān)系，大家都很喜歡一條一條擺原因。Firstly, secondly...然后后面至于這個(gè)ly后面是什么就不管了，一頓胡扯。也不管這段落與段落之間的銜接是否自然，反正都有什么ly給打頭陣。

事實(shí)上，中西方的思維總是存在差異，很多時(shí)候看管老師們都不懂考生在說(shuō)什么?？脊俸芾Щ?，這個(gè)例子和這個(gè)有關(guān)系嗎?為什么前面在說(shuō)A，后面突然B了?

和結(jié)論什么關(guān)系?要記住一點(diǎn)，文章是一個(gè)整體，你的開(kāi)篇結(jié)尾和中部?jī)?nèi)容都是應(yīng)該有關(guān)聯(lián)的。也就是說(shuō)，在開(kāi)頭提到的，文中應(yīng)該有展開(kāi)，同時(shí)在結(jié)尾有總結(jié)。中文里不也要求行文流暢么，這至少得要求邏輯是通順的。

很多同學(xué)都很喜歡寫中立觀點(diǎn)“A不錯(cuò)，但不夠好”，這雖然看起來(lái)很客觀，但實(shí)際上對(duì)邏輯的要求非常高，要怎樣去組織語(yǔ)言，組織相應(yīng)的論據(jù)論點(diǎn)，非?？简?yàn)人。

有同學(xué)想說(shuō)A事件要瑕疵互見(jiàn)，但是寫著寫著就亂七八糟，東一塊西一塊，不知道在講點(diǎn)什么了。更有厲害的索性冗長(zhǎng)的2000來(lái)詞，講了個(gè)空話。所以建議剛上手的同學(xué)，還是選擇一邊倒，站定腳跟不放松。即便是真的要寫中立觀點(diǎn)，實(shí)際上也都在A和B之間有所偏好。

此外，現(xiàn)在很多人會(huì)要求練writing的時(shí)候先寫提綱。于是同學(xué)們們就只寫一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)，然后后面的例子亂用，或者根本沒(méi)有弄清楚什么是例子。事實(shí)上，這種展開(kāi)，可以是實(shí)例，也可以是虛擬的假設(shè)。實(shí)例中往往分自己的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和他人的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。那么怎樣的例子有說(shuō)服力呢?

一般來(lái)說(shuō)是：名人名事(知名度大)> 眾人眾事(樣本大)>自己經(jīng)歷(體會(huì)深)>他人經(jīng)歷。假設(shè)往往不夠有說(shuō)服力，因?yàn)楹茈y涉及到每一個(gè)變量。但是假設(shè)在有的時(shí)候可以行得通，就是在很難說(shuō)清楚步驟和因果關(guān)系的時(shí)候，用一個(gè)假設(shè)場(chǎng)景來(lái)推導(dǎo)會(huì)讓文章變得淺顯易懂。

所以建議，在剛開(kāi)始上手寫toefl作文的時(shí)候，先不要給自己30分鐘的壓力，先列出提綱(10分鐘)，再用30分鐘去寫，看能寫多少。

記住你的舉例一定要死死扣住你的觀點(diǎn)，不要是和觀點(diǎn)打擦邊球的。比如我改過(guò)之前一個(gè)小朋友的文章，她的大觀點(diǎn)是電腦對(duì)學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)是有益的，小觀點(diǎn)是，可以查到很多資料，然后例子是可以用google查到很多資料，很快捷。

ok，乍一看這個(gè)沒(méi)有問(wèn)題。但是實(shí)際上問(wèn)題大了，用goole查到很多資料，是因?yàn)殡娔X還是internet?這很容易就偏題了，變成internet對(duì)學(xué)生來(lái)說(shuō)是有益的。例子一定要從論點(diǎn)出發(fā)，再回到論點(diǎn)。不要將你的論點(diǎn)發(fā)散，后果很可能就是越寫越跑題。所以每次寫好一篇文章，都看看，論據(jù)里的key words是不是和論點(diǎn)里的key words 一樣，論點(diǎn)里的key words又是不是和題目里的key words一樣。你的key words 可以比大題里的key words更加narrow，但是千萬(wàn)不要更加廣泛。

最后說(shuō)的邏輯錯(cuò)誤，是段落中邏輯比較容易錯(cuò)的。一般是對(duì)接續(xù)詞的運(yùn)用。如However, thus, therefore，他們決定了上下文之間的關(guān)系，但是很多讀起來(lái)就很奇怪，兩者完全不是轉(zhuǎn)折的關(guān)系，用了however，就會(huì)讓人覺(jué)得有些無(wú)厘頭。

或者就是上下文之間完全沒(méi)有邏輯聯(lián)系，就是兩個(gè)單句湊在了一起。還是這句話，一篇文章和流水似的，不能斷。中間斷了那就不叫好文章了。即使前一句與有一句沒(méi)有接續(xù)詞，它們?cè)谶壿嬌弦彩且艹薪拥摹?/p>

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."

Everyone can agree with this issue or not. I think everyone can have arguments to support it and arguments to not support it. It's one of that issue that is not true for everyone. I think if you know what to look for in your life maybe all your efforts can be very concentrated on certain things with the result of obtain what you planned to have in your life, with the result of being satisfied more than people who ask themselves any kind of questions prior to doing anything or prior to think about anything. These factors summarize to display truth about the issue and the discussion. People can disagree if they choose it. Now the question is wisdom belongs to those who know what to look for or to those who know what to overlook and in this behavior they can touch or stop the widom of other people?

Comments:

This response presents a fundamentally deficient discussion of the issue.

The first portion of the response, while referring to "this issue," never clearly identifies the issue and, instead, contains statements that could be attributed to any number of topics. As such, there is little evidence of the ability to organize and develop a coherent analysis of the stated claim. The final statement essentially rephrases the topic as a question and seems to try to interpret its meaning, but -- without an explanation -- the ending merely adds to the overall confusion.

The severe and persistent errors in language and sentence structure add to the overall incoherence and the score of 1.

GRE寫作滿分范文賞析

"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."

It is common sense to think or state that wisdom should be attributed to peopel who only know what to overlook in life. But is should also be attributed to people who only know what to look at in life. Reason for this is because all the people should be exposed to this concept of wisdom. Even if the people who tened to overlook at life may have more of a background from farther reading and reading and research which they may have engaged in, there has got to be a way to expose the other people who may not be as knowledgable, to this type of wisdom. In this way everyone will be able to take part in variouse discusion or debates that may be held based on the topicof what to Look For In Life. It is also very true that when the topic of overlooking or looking at life comes up in a discussion everyone in the room is likely to have a common of their own to add. Their for the wisdome that may based on it is for everyone and not only the most wise one.

Comments:

This response received a score of 2, not because of language problems, but because reasoning, analysis, and development are extremely thin and insubstantial.

This response displays serious weaknesses in analyzing the issue. Although the response states a position and offers limited support for the position, the reasons given are not always clear. The writer seems to be making an interesting point -- that more people should "be exposed to this concept of wisdom," but here, too, the meaning is not communicated clearly.

The response is further flawed by serious and frequent problems in language and sentence structure, which often obscure meaning.

This is not a 1 essay because the response does present a position with some support, and it is able to communicate some ideas clearly.