gre考試的情況非常引人注意，大家是否了解gre寫作考試呢?今天小編給大家?guī)韌re考試寫作高分策略分享，希望能夠幫助到大家，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

gre考試寫作高分策略分享

你需要一個(gè)gre寫作策略

為什么很多考生在gre寫作考試中會(huì)出現(xiàn)重復(fù)的問題?主要原因如下：

一。gre考試詞匯儲(chǔ)備不足

這是虛詞單調(diào)的最常見原因?？忌~匯量小，沒有專門的文字訓(xùn)練和背誦，范文數(shù)量不夠。沒有足夠的準(zhǔn)備，他寫不出各種各樣的字，事實(shí)就是這樣。

2.缺乏詞匯掌握

作為一名合格的GRE考生，背誦大量單詞是必要的。然而，在記憶單詞的要求上也存在一些問題。很多人對(duì)GRE詞匯背誦的要求只是相互熟悉，能夠理解或大致理解詞義，而很少有考生去了解句子中詞匯的具體用法。這也使得考生知道了很多單詞，看了大量的詞匯，但當(dāng)他們真正使用它們時(shí)，他們只能使用那些舊單詞。

三。缺乏實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)

一些考生可能已經(jīng)意識(shí)到了背單詞和掌握一些生詞使用方法的重要性。然而，由于缺乏實(shí)踐或無人幫助批改和復(fù)習(xí)，gre寫作方法,gre寫作怎么練他們不敢在實(shí)際寫作中使用這些詞。他們覺得自己不確定，害怕誤用所以經(jīng)過一輪之后，他們只能沿著一條穩(wěn)定的道路，反復(fù)使用老字眼。

避免重復(fù)用詞扣分

現(xiàn)在我們知道了重復(fù)問題的原因，相應(yīng)的解決方案非常清楚。候選人需要做兩件事：

一。特殊記憶寫作詞匯

首先，如果缺乏詞匯，那么我們應(yīng)該開始有意識(shí)地積累一些詞匯，特別是專門用于寫作的詞匯。編輯建議考生可以參考GRE作文高分模式官方或權(quán)威出版物或黃金材料，從中收集一些用字不多但在模式中使用頻率高的詞匯，這些詞匯不僅適合寫作，而且可以帶來高分，具有很高的實(shí)用價(jià)值。你可以在這方面積累更多的文字來代替寫作和自己的習(xí)慣，這樣會(huì)起到很好的效果，豐富文章的呈現(xiàn)形式。

2.積累更多經(jīng)驗(yàn)

其次，如果考生害怕用生詞制造問題，那么我們需要做的就是多練習(xí)。我們不必做一個(gè)完整的寫作練習(xí)，我們可以專注于練習(xí)詞匯替換，找到一些我們已經(jīng)寫過的文章，并用相同意思的詞替換它們?nèi)绻麑?duì)詞匯的使用不確定，可以通過QQ群論壇等方式查字典找例句或一般句子，幫助他人確定其使用方法，充分掌握詞匯的正確使用方法，這樣自然可以保證在考試中大膽使用生詞，提高構(gòu)詞質(zhì)量。

GRE作文范文：事物不會(huì)一成不變

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

2018年GRE作文范文參考：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

GRE作文范文：審查的公正性

Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.

Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.

The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.

Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.